Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Think DOGE was bad? Wait until Schedule F
https://www.yahoo.com/news/doge-bad-schedule-f-worse-120000302.htmlOriginally from The Atlantic:
In the waning days of the first Trump administration, the White House announced a plan to convert an estimated 50,000 government employees to a status similar to political appointees—meaning that they would become “at will” hires who serve purely at the president’s pleasure. Schedule F, as this plan was known, was never implemented then and was revoked immediately under Joe Biden’s presidency. But now the policy is back, formally resurrected by executive order on April 18. If this new-look Schedule F survives the inevitable court challenges, it will mark a major step forward in a MAGA quest laid out by J. D. Vance in 2021 to “fire every single mid-level bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state,” and “replace them with our people.”
President Donald Trump hyped the new order on Truth Social. “If these government workers refuse to advance the policy interests of the President, or are engaging in corrupt behavior,” he wrote, “they should no longer have a job.” In the interregnum before Trump’s second term, the original Schedule F proposal was kept alive in Republican policy circles, notably by the Heritage Foundation’s influential Project 2025 document. Now rebranded as “Restoring Accountability to Policy-Influencing Positions Within the Federal Workforce,” the order focuses on the president’s authority to remove traditional civil-service protections from about 2 percent of the federal workforce and terminate them at his discretion. (The policy allows exemption for certain classes of government employees, such as Border Patrol agents.)
Civil servants swear an oath to the Constitution, and are required to apply the laws of the United States as enacted by Congress. Their salaries are paid by all U.S. taxpayers. These obligations are every bit as important as loyalty to the president: Part of their job involves speaking truth to power, even when the facts they convey may be inconvenient and the policy choices difficult. The new order’s priority on personal fealty is clear in its grant of power to federal agencies to fire an employee for “subversion of Presidential directives.” If far more civil servants can be summarily dismissed, they’re less likely to risk frank conversations with senior administration officials. The quality of their advice will suffer, and their chief interest will be in preserving their jobs by pleasing their political masters. To an extent, the Trump administration is responding to legitimate concerns about performance and accountability within the federal bureaucracy, but replacing tens of thousands of people with political hires is highly unlikely to fix what ails the government.
President Donald Trump hyped the new order on Truth Social. “If these government workers refuse to advance the policy interests of the President, or are engaging in corrupt behavior,” he wrote, “they should no longer have a job.” In the interregnum before Trump’s second term, the original Schedule F proposal was kept alive in Republican policy circles, notably by the Heritage Foundation’s influential Project 2025 document. Now rebranded as “Restoring Accountability to Policy-Influencing Positions Within the Federal Workforce,” the order focuses on the president’s authority to remove traditional civil-service protections from about 2 percent of the federal workforce and terminate them at his discretion. (The policy allows exemption for certain classes of government employees, such as Border Patrol agents.)
Civil servants swear an oath to the Constitution, and are required to apply the laws of the United States as enacted by Congress. Their salaries are paid by all U.S. taxpayers. These obligations are every bit as important as loyalty to the president: Part of their job involves speaking truth to power, even when the facts they convey may be inconvenient and the policy choices difficult. The new order’s priority on personal fealty is clear in its grant of power to federal agencies to fire an employee for “subversion of Presidential directives.” If far more civil servants can be summarily dismissed, they’re less likely to risk frank conversations with senior administration officials. The quality of their advice will suffer, and their chief interest will be in preserving their jobs by pleasing their political masters. To an extent, the Trump administration is responding to legitimate concerns about performance and accountability within the federal bureaucracy, but replacing tens of thousands of people with political hires is highly unlikely to fix what ails the government.
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
