Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaddow Blog-Trump boots Waltz from national security adviser role, nominates for U.N. ambassadorship
Secretary of State Marco Rubio will take over Waltz's White House duties in an interim capacity, Trump posted on Truth Social.
https://bsky.app/profile/stevebenen.com/post/3lo4plgihf22v
On the one hand, Waltz joins an ignominious group of failed Trump WH national security advisers (Flynn, McMaster, Bolton).
On the other, he also joins an ignominious group of failed House Republicans tapped for key second-term posts (Gaetz, Stefanik, and now Waltz).
On the other, he also joins an ignominious group of failed House Republicans tapped for key second-term posts (Gaetz, Stefanik, and now Waltz).
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/mike-waltz-out-trump-national-security-adviser-signal-chat-rcna204115
As recently as Wednesday, during the latest White House Cabinet meeting, national security adviser Mike Waltz seemed to go out of his way to offer effusive praise for Donald Trump. The presidents difficulties with Waltz have been well documented, especially in the wake of the recent Signal chat scandal, but the adviser took the opportunity to make clear that he was pleased to be part of the White House team.
Less than 24 hours later, it appears Waltz is losing his White House job while being nominated for a different job. Trump wrote on his social media platform:
This is, among things, deeply odd in part because Waltz has no meaningful diplomatic experience, in part because there's so little overlap between his current position and the U.N. ambassadorship, and in part because it's difficult to imagine how one person is supposed to be the nation's chief diplomat at the State Department and the president's top national security adviser in the West Wing.
What's more, with this latest appointment, Rubio now has four rather large roles to manage: secretary of state, acting archivist of the United States, acting administrator for the U.S. Agency for International Development, and interim national security adviser......
Publicly, the White House backed Waltz, but NBC News reported that Trump had privately expressed frustration with his aide. That coincided with a Politico report on a private presidential meeting in which top officials, including Vice President JD Vance, told Trump to consider showing him [Waltz] the door.
A day later, The New York Times reported that the president sought the counsel of a variety of people, asking whether to oust Waltz.
The public chatter ultimately died down, but there was ample evidence that Waltz had been privately sidelined in the West Wing, putting his future in jeopardy.
As for his next gig, the ambassadorship to the United Nations is a Senate-confirmed position, and Waltz's confirmation hearings are bound to be interesting. Observers should expect a great many questions about his ability to handle and protect classified information.
Less than 24 hours later, it appears Waltz is losing his White House job while being nominated for a different job. Trump wrote on his social media platform:
I am pleased to announce that I will be nominating Mike Waltz to be the next United States Ambassador to the United Nations. ... In the interim, Secretary of State Marco Rubio will serve as National Security Advisor, while continuing his strong leadership at the State Department.
This is, among things, deeply odd in part because Waltz has no meaningful diplomatic experience, in part because there's so little overlap between his current position and the U.N. ambassadorship, and in part because it's difficult to imagine how one person is supposed to be the nation's chief diplomat at the State Department and the president's top national security adviser in the West Wing.
What's more, with this latest appointment, Rubio now has four rather large roles to manage: secretary of state, acting archivist of the United States, acting administrator for the U.S. Agency for International Development, and interim national security adviser......
Publicly, the White House backed Waltz, but NBC News reported that Trump had privately expressed frustration with his aide. That coincided with a Politico report on a private presidential meeting in which top officials, including Vice President JD Vance, told Trump to consider showing him [Waltz] the door.
A day later, The New York Times reported that the president sought the counsel of a variety of people, asking whether to oust Waltz.
The public chatter ultimately died down, but there was ample evidence that Waltz had been privately sidelined in the West Wing, putting his future in jeopardy.
As for his next gig, the ambassadorship to the United Nations is a Senate-confirmed position, and Waltz's confirmation hearings are bound to be interesting. Observers should expect a great many questions about his ability to handle and protect classified information.
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Maddow Blog-Trump boots Waltz from national security adviser role, nominates for U.N. ambassadorship (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
Thursday
OP
NoMoreRepugs
(11,263 posts)1. Little Marco is this terms reincarnation of JerkOffJared the SIL who had
responsibility for almost everything while having expertise in NOTHING.