Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,497 posts)
Fri May 2, 2025, 02:02 PM 22 hrs ago

Umm, maybe the children will have zero dolls instead of one..

“Well, maybe the children will have to have two dolls instead of 30 dolls, you know? And maybe the two dolls will cost a couple of bucks more than they would normally.”

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Umm, maybe the children will have zero dolls instead of one.. (Original Post) G_j 22 hrs ago OP
If they can't have a doll, let them eat cake. Ocelot II 22 hrs ago #1
Joanns is going out of business. Vulture Capital. haele 21 hrs ago #2

haele

(14,156 posts)
2. Joanns is going out of business. Vulture Capital.
Fri May 2, 2025, 03:27 PM
21 hrs ago

We picked up about two dozen Xmas and small "spare gifts for grandkids friend's birthdays or xmas" at 50 to 75%; craft kits, cookie cutters and candy making molds, hobby tools with components and puzzles. Also got plushy Xmas stocking stuffers and crazy socks. And, generic wrapping paper.
And a bin to hide them all in the closet with.
Not to mention enough cotton and wool blend yarn, cotton fabric, and sewing notions for any sewing or knit/crochet projects we are planning to engage in over the upcoming year.
Ya, it might be cheap Chinese stuff, but still around $250 well spent, instead of the probably $800 just to get half that amount later in the year.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Umm, maybe the children w...