General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLANL plans to release highly radioactive tritium to prevent explosions. Will it just release danger in the air?
Those controversial plans date back to 2016, when LANL discovered that a potentially explosive amount of hydrogen and oxygen was building up in four containers of tritium waste stored in a decades-old nuclear dump called Area G. The safest and most technically viable solution, the lab decided and the best way to protect workers would be to release the pressure and, with it, thousands of curies of tritium into the air.
When advocates caught wind of the venting in March 2020, Covid was in its earliest and most unnerving phase. Pueblo leaders, advocates and environmentalists wrote impassioned letters to the lab and the EPA, demanding that they change or, at the very least, postpone the release until after the pandemic. At the same time, Tewa Women United, a nonprofit founded by Indigenous women from northern New Mexico, issued its first online petition, focusing on tritiums ability to cross the placental barrier and possibly harm pregnant women and their fetuses. Only after a maelstrom of opposition did the lab pause its plans and begin briefing local tribes and other concerned members of the community. . https://searchlightnm.org/lanl-plans-to-release-highly-radioactive-tritium-to-prevent-explosions-will-it-just-release-danger-in-the-air/
From: Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety- Santa Fe, NM. www.nuclearactivr.org
LANL Plans to Begin Venting Large Quantities of Radioactive Tritium On or After June 2nd
During the early days of the pandemic, on March 10, 2020, LANL mailed a notice to people on the facility mailing list about the proposed venting of radioactive tritium into the air from four metal containers stored at Area G. LANLs request provided information about its plan to seek temporary authorization to vent from the New Mexico Environment Department, specifically from the Hazardous Waste Bureau.

hedda_foil
(16,703 posts)womanofthehills
(9,702 posts)Criticisms of this venting have always centered on two of the elements key characteristics: First, it travels tens to hundreds of miles, according to lab documents. Second, when tritium is in the form of water, it becomes omnipresent and easy for bodies to absorb.
Im in the middle of NM but have friends in Espanola & northern NM.
Sounds like lots of routine radioactive releases from the National Lab.
About 20 yrs ago, Amy Goodman said she was traveling to NM and her mom told her dont drink the water - its radioactive. Just a tidbit I have always remembered.
Disaffected
(5,533 posts)would be dependent on how quicky the tritium was released (over days, months, years??). Tritium is also relatively benign as far as radioactive materials go (is a beta emitter only IIRC and has a short half-life (12.5 years)).
This is similar to the conundrum faced by Japan with their huge amount of tritium contaminated cooling water from Fukushima (they want to release it into the ocean).
ProfessorGAC
(72,473 posts)It's not chemically toxic, but it is a low radioactive isotope.
High exposure has been shown to increase cancer risk.
I'd be interested to know if they plan to time this with wind events to dilute closer to baseline.
I do think the article is a bit over the top. The "150,000 times more radioactive than plutonium" is misleading &, I think, intentionally so.
While that phrase is correct with regard to radioactivity per unit mass. But, the energy level of the photons released by plutonium decay are many orders of magnitude greater than the beta emissions of tritium. That phrase seems to be a scare tactic.
And, what is the risk of not relieving that pressure?
I'm not diminishing the serious health implications of this proposal, but I don't think it's as black & white as the writing suggests. And, the author's agenda is suspect, given tge scare tactic employed
sboatcar
(604 posts)And if its a slow release it probably won't raise radiation levels much above the regular background level
ProfessorGAC
(72,473 posts)...under windy conditions, where the volume expansion creates a substantial decrease in concentration.
Like you, I think the explosion would be far more dangerous.
Blue Full Moon
(2,099 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(55,108 posts)Tritium is an isotope of Hydrogen, with one proton and two neutrons in the nucleus. It has one electron whizzing around it so it behaves chemically just like ordinary Hydrogen which has one proton, no neutrons, and one electron.