Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Maddowblog-Judge halts Trump's power grab on federal elections and voter registrations
Last edited Sun Jun 15, 2025, 05:30 PM - Edit history (1)
Judge halts Trump’s power grab on federal elections and voter registrations
Judge halts Trump’s power grab on federal elections and voter registrations
— (@innersunshine.bsky.social) 2025-06-14T22:46:26.204Z
When the president signed an executive order asserting radical powers over elections, he invited lawsuits. He’s now losing the court fights.
www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/judge-halts-trumps-power-grab-federal-elections-voter-registrations-rcna212824
When Donald Trump signed an executive order in March, asserting radical powers of federal elections, it was widely assumed that the president’s power grab would spark lawsuits he was likely to lose. Those assumptions, unsurprisingly, were correct. CBS News reported:
For those who might benefit from a recap, let’s review how we arrived at this point......
The president did all of this by exercising a legal authority he did not, and does not, have.
A Washington Post report summarized the problem succinctly: “The U.S. Constitution designates the power to regulate the ‘time, place and manner’ of elections to the states, with the proviso that Congress can step in and override those laws. It gives no specific power to the president to do so. Election experts said that Trump was claiming power he does not have and that lawsuits over the measure were all but guaranteed.”
With this in mind, a federal judge two months ago blocked enforcement of parts of the Republican’s directive, in response to cases filed by the Democratic Party and several voting rights advocates. Now, Judge Casper has followed suit.
“There is no dispute (nor could there be) that U.S. citizenship is required to vote in federal elections and the federal voter registration forms require attestation of citizenship,” Casper wrote in her 44-page ruling. “The issue here is whether the president can require documentary proof of citizenship where the authority for election requirements is in the hands of Congress, its statutes ... do not require it, and the statutorily created [Election Assistance Commission] is required to go through a notice and comment period and consult with the States before implementing any changes to the federal forms for voter registration.”
If recent history is any guide, the administration will appeal the ruling, and House Republicans could consider impeaching the judge in this case. Watch this space.
A federal judge in Massachusetts blocked President Trump’s administration from implementing portions of his executive order that imposed new requirements involving proof of citizenship to register to vote in U.S. elections. U.S. District Judge Denise Casper agreed to grant a preliminary injunction sought by attorneys general from 19 states, who brought their legal challenge to Mr. Trump’s executive order in April and sought to block sections of it.
For those who might benefit from a recap, let’s review how we arrived at this point......
The president did all of this by exercising a legal authority he did not, and does not, have.
A Washington Post report summarized the problem succinctly: “The U.S. Constitution designates the power to regulate the ‘time, place and manner’ of elections to the states, with the proviso that Congress can step in and override those laws. It gives no specific power to the president to do so. Election experts said that Trump was claiming power he does not have and that lawsuits over the measure were all but guaranteed.”
With this in mind, a federal judge two months ago blocked enforcement of parts of the Republican’s directive, in response to cases filed by the Democratic Party and several voting rights advocates. Now, Judge Casper has followed suit.
“There is no dispute (nor could there be) that U.S. citizenship is required to vote in federal elections and the federal voter registration forms require attestation of citizenship,” Casper wrote in her 44-page ruling. “The issue here is whether the president can require documentary proof of citizenship where the authority for election requirements is in the hands of Congress, its statutes ... do not require it, and the statutorily created [Election Assistance Commission] is required to go through a notice and comment period and consult with the States before implementing any changes to the federal forms for voter registration.”
If recent history is any guide, the administration will appeal the ruling, and House Republicans could consider impeaching the judge in this case. Watch this space.