but to answer your specific question, I call myself someone who is deeply saddened by the suffering and dying of my fellow human beings due to senseless conflict.
Now you have a nice evening.

ancianita

(40,669 posts)

4. I see. Just your opinion of my opinion. Got it.

Reply to anciano (Reply #3)

Mon Jun 16, 2025, 11:07 PM

5 hrs ago

Mosby

(18,634 posts)

5. It's a great example of what's gone wrong with the media.

Reply to ancianita (Original post)

Mon Jun 16, 2025, 11:22 PM

5 hrs ago

Nowhere in the article does it explain that Israel is launching guided missles from fighter jets with specific targets in mind, nuclear sites, missle sites, commanders etc.

Meanwhile Iran is just lobbing missles at anything in Israel, apartments buildings, strip malls, schools, playgrounds.

Just remarkable.

ancianita

(40,669 posts)

6. Your standard about what's wrong with media is based on coverage from a live, fluid war zone?

Reply to Mosby (Reply #5)

Tue Jun 17, 2025, 12:12 AM

4 hrs ago

Are you sure that's fair?

Reuters has at least eleven reports of Israel-Iran attacks.

There are also four front page NYT reports, and four front page Guardian reports, each with a Live report that gives updates.
This OP report is only designed to show/summarize the attacks visually.
In its main report, The Guardian lists a few hits, one of them being in Tel Aviv, near Israel's defense buildings.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/16/iran-threatens-to-leave-nuclear-weapons-treaty-as-israeli-bombing-enters-fourth-day

uncle ray

(3,240 posts)

7. "Israeli reporting restrictions limit the ability to assess what if any damage has been done to strategic locations"

Reply to Mosby (Reply #5)

Tue Jun 17, 2025, 12:15 AM

4 hrs ago

Reply to this discussion