General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe People Search Sites in the Suspected Minnesota Killer's Notebook Are a Failure of Congress

People search sites can present a risk to citizens privacy, and, depending on the context, physical safety. They aggregate data from property records, social media, marriage licenses, and other places and make it accessible to even those with no tech savvy. Some are free, some are paid, and some require a user to tick a box confirming theyre only using the data for certain permitted use cases.
This notepad does not necessarily mean that Boelter used these specific sites to find Hortmans or other officials addresses. As the New York Times noted, Hortmans address was on her campaign website, and Minnesota State Senator John Hoffman, who Boelter allegedly shot along with Hoffmans wife, listed his address on his official legislative webpage.
The sites inclusion shows they are of high interest to a person who allegedly murdered and targeted multiple officials and their families in an act of political violence. Next to some of the people search site names, Boelter appears to have put a star or tick.
https://www.404media.co/the-people-search-sites-in-the-suspected-minnesota-killers-notebook-are-a-failure-of-congress/

Ponietz
(3,952 posts)kirby
(4,514 posts)This is a data broker and lack of data privacy issue.
Ocelot II
(126,284 posts)Boelter didn't have to work very hard to find the info he wanted. In Minnesota, as in many other states (only 10 have full-time legislatures), being a member of the legislature is a part-time job, since the legislature is in session for only 120 days a year, and the annual salary is only about $48K. So when the legislature isn't in session they're working at something else in order to make a full-time living. This means they are just regular members of the community, which is a good thing since they're living among and familiar with their constituencies (unlike members of Congress). But it also means that anybody can easily figure out where they live, where they hang out, where they work or shop or where their kids go to school. 20 or 30 years ago you could have just used the phone book to find them. But 20 or 30 years ago nobody worried about politically-motivated assassins, and it is definitely creepy that so much information about people is on line now. Is it even possible to prevent that information from being generally available?