Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IrishBubbaLiberal

(2,292 posts)
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 12:19 PM Jun 17

Human shields double standard, Israeli leaders in underground bases in populated areas which Israel condemned Gaza for

Israel attacking Iran and Iran attacking back has driven Israeli leaders underground and required US media to gingerly note the IDF maintains underground bases in “populated areas”. I wrote about this awkward fact and US media’s racist and cheesy “human shields” double standard.

https://www.columnblog.com/p/israeli-leaders-hiding-in-tunnels

Israel attacking Iran and Iran attacking back has driven Israeli leaders underground and required US media to gingerly note the IDF maintains underground bases in “populated areas”. I wrote about this awkward fact and US media’s racist and cheesy “human shields” double standard.

Adam H Johnson (@ahjohnson.bsky.social) 2025-06-16T20:27:47.254Z



Israeli Leaders Hiding in Tunnels, Underground IDF Bases in ‘Populated Areas’: US Media’s Human Shields Double Standard

Why is Jake Tapper not lamenting the IDF doing the exact same things he accuses Hamas of doing?

ADAM JOHNSON
JUN 16, 2025

Human Shields discourse has always been a brainless, dehumanizing talking point—a way for liberals to hand-wave away the endless slaughter in Gaza and, better yet, pin the obscene death toll of Palestinians on “Hamas” or other militants. Hamas, the argument goes, “embeds itself among the civilian population” and thus takes moral responsibility for any carnage Israel’s jet fighters, snipers, and shelling visit upon a largely defenseless and besieged Gaza population. It’s a convenient talking point, to say the least. It feels superficially true, appeals to people’s racist reptile brains, and gives Israel license to kill as many civilians as possible because, we are constantly reminded by US media, virtually all of Gaza is over tunnels and thus contains 2 million human shields. It’s cheap, it's easy, and—most important of all—gets Western leaders funneling bombs to Israel off the hook, which is always the place everyone must end up.

Israel’s unprovoked attack on Iran last week, and Iran’s subsequent attack on Israel, however, has exposed just how hollow this talking point is. Let us examine a recent throw-away line in a New York Times article explaining the latest escalation. It’s noteworthy because reporter Isabel Kershner casually admits that Israel, based on US media’s criteria for Hamas, is engaging in textbook human shielding:

“the [Israeli] military maintains bases and camps in many populated areas, as well as in more remote parts of the country. A residential tower block that suffered a direct hit early Saturday is part of a popular entertainment district, filled with cafes and restaurants. It is also close to the main military and government headquarters in Tel Aviv, which was most likely the intended target.”


In response to the Times report, former head of Human Rights Watch Ken Roth tweeted out, “Israel's close intermingling of military and civilian sites makes it difficult to know what Iran is aiming its missiles at. When Hamas does this in the tiny Gaza Strip, Israel accuses it of using human shields.”


More
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Human shields double standard, Israeli leaders in underground bases in populated areas which Israel condemned Gaza for (Original Post) IrishBubbaLiberal Jun 17 OP
So to maintain similar standards sarisataka Jun 17 #1
50,000 dead Palestinians in Gaza IrishBubbaLiberal Jun 17 #2
Are we talking JustAnotherGen Jun 17 #5
Got it sarisataka Jun 17 #6
A military base in the middle of town is a fair bit different to using the local kindergarten as a weapons depot. Lancero Jun 17 #3
This is such a flaky excuse for an argument! Beastly Boy Jun 17 #4
... LexVegas Jun 17 #7

sarisataka

(21,794 posts)
1. So to maintain similar standards
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 12:27 PM
Jun 17

we should see Iran condemned for striking civilian areas even if there is a military target within- correct?

So far most strikes in Iran, both through Iranian and outside media have shown Israel is hitting military and nuclear research targets. In Israel a handful of military targets have been struck but most damage has been done to civilian areas.

Yet we see mostly support for Iran or at least disinterest in Israeli casualties (the lack of attention given to a post about Israeli Palestinians killed in an Iranian attack was telling.)

IrishBubbaLiberal

(2,292 posts)
2. 50,000 dead Palestinians in Gaza
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 12:32 PM
Jun 17

This widespread disinterest by so many of the slaughter done by Israel,
Is sickening.

50,000 civilians slaughtered,
Hospitals destroyed,
Israel actually actively starving an entire population in Gaza.

Yet so many are disinterested.

Sick.

Israeli government is a vile sick regime with Netanyahu

sarisataka

(21,794 posts)
6. Got it
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 12:44 PM
Jun 17

Palestinian deaths caused by Israel- bad
Deaths of Israelis, even if Palestinian- Netanyahu is bad

double standard
noun
1
: a set of principles that applies differently and usually more rigorously to one group of people or circumstances than to another
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/double%20standard

Lancero

(3,215 posts)
3. A military base in the middle of town is a fair bit different to using the local kindergarten as a weapons depot.
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 12:40 PM
Jun 17

The former is what Israel is doing. The latter, Gaza.

Beastly Boy

(12,807 posts)
4. This is such a flaky excuse for an argument!
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 12:43 PM
Jun 17

Have any of these alleged underground bases been targeted?

Because, you know, it takes deliberate targeting of military assets in the presence of civilians to even bring up human shields as a topic.

All I see is Iran targeting exclusively civilian areas with no military assets present there, and then some schmuck bringing up human shields as an excuse for something completely nonsensical.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Human shields double stan...