Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

In It to Win It

(10,748 posts)
Wed Jun 18, 2025, 10:36 PM Wednesday

BREAKING: Judge Kacsmaryk strikes down Biden-era HIPAA rule protecting reproductive health information from disclosure

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-judge-invalidates-biden-rule-protecting-privacy-abortions-2025-06-18/


June 18 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Wednesday struck down a rule adopted by the administration of former President Joe Biden that strengthened privacy protections for women seeking abortions and patients who receive gender transition treatments.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk in Amarillo, Texas, said the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services exceeded its powers and unlawfully limited states' ability to enforce their public health laws when it adopted the rule last year.

Keep up with the latest medical breakthroughs and healthcare trends with the Reuters Health Rounds newsletter. Sign up here.

The rule prohibits healthcare providers and insurers from giving information about a legal abortion to state law enforcement authorities who are seeking to punish someone in connection with that abortion.

"HHS lacked clear delegated authority to fashion special protections for medical information produced by politically favored medical procedures," wrote Kacsmaryk, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, a Republican, during his first term.

Kacsmaryk in December had blocked HHS from enforcing the rule against a Texas doctor who had brought the lawsuit, Carmen Purl, pending the outcome of the case. Wednesday's decision blocks the rule nationwide.


Abortion? Not in the Constitution.

Uterus surveillance? Constitutionally protected.

Joe Dudek (@joedudekjd.bsky.social) 2025-06-19T00:29:08.515Z


14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BREAKING: Judge Kacsmaryk strikes down Biden-era HIPAA rule protecting reproductive health information from disclosure (Original Post) In It to Win It Wednesday OP
Of course it would be Kacsmaryk. Ocelot II Wednesday #1
Yeah Demovictory9 Wednesday #8
Criminally identified. byronius Yesterday #12
Abortion. Not in the Bible. BOSSHOG Wednesday #2
He is not any judge, he is Trump's go to judge Bev54 Wednesday #3
That fucker again Hong Kong Cavalier Wednesday #4
The president of the He-Man, Woman Haters' Club has spoken. Efilroft Sul Wednesday #5
"politically favored medical procedures" musette_sf Wednesday #6
I found that phrase to be about as vile and idiotic as possible. AZ8theist Yesterday #11
Damn it! Damn it! Damn it! I can't take much more of this shit! 2MuchNoise Wednesday #7
Aw shit. calimary Yesterday #9
My daughter is in Europe on vacation. BidenRocks Yesterday #10
A FEDERAL court decision so it affects the entire country!!! Grins Yesterday #13
This guy again??? DET Yesterday #14

musette_sf

(10,401 posts)
6. "politically favored medical procedures"
Wed Jun 18, 2025, 10:49 PM
Wednesday

Last edited Thu Jun 19, 2025, 03:08 AM - Edit history (1)

Medical procedures have ZERO to do with “political favor”.

If this shit decision is going to stand, then the barely-regulated marketing and sales of ED generics must be seen as “politically favored”, since slut-shamers like Kacsmaryk don’t give a shit if they are handed out like f’n Halloween candy.

AZ8theist

(6,748 posts)
11. I found that phrase to be about as vile and idiotic as possible.
Thu Jun 19, 2025, 01:02 AM
Yesterday

This jerk-off judge would acquit Mengele.

Grins

(8,494 posts)
13. A FEDERAL court decision so it affects the entire country!!!
Thu Jun 19, 2025, 01:15 AM
Yesterday

Just like his ruling against the FDA over Mifepristone in 2023. And no Republicans stood up against that decision by a federal district court.

But take those same Republicans in a situation where federal district court judges rule against Trump over habeas corpus, and suddenly it is the tyranny of “rogue judges!”

God, I hate them.

DET

(2,065 posts)
14. This guy again???
Thu Jun 19, 2025, 01:26 AM
Yesterday

How do they get away with referring every damn decision to this piece of work in Butscratch, Texas? This is not justice.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: Judge Kacsmaryk...