Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

orangecrush

(25,179 posts)
Sat Jun 21, 2025, 08:45 PM Saturday

Did a Google AI search on the legality of the attack on Iran

And got this

"No, the president cannot legally impose the bombing of a country without the authorization of Congress, according to the U.S. Constitution and subsequent laws. While the president serves as Commander in Chief of the armed forces, the power to declare war, which includes authorizing military actions like bombing, is specifically granted to Congress.
Elaboration:
Constitutional Framework:
The U.S. Constitution divides the power to make war between the President and Congress. Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 grants Congress the power to "declare War," while Article II, Section 2 designates the President as Commander in Chief.
Checks and Balances:
This division of power is a key element of the system of checks and balances designed to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful.
War Powers Resolution:
The War Powers Resolution of 1973, enacted in response to the Vietnam War, further limits the president's ability to commit troops to hostilities without congressional authorization.
Exceptions:
While the president cannot initiate a full-scale war without Congress, they do have the authority to respond to attacks or imminent threats against the U.S. or its forces. In such cases, the president is expected to notify Congress within 48 hours and can only engage in hostilities for a limited time (60 days) without further congressional authorization. "

So. DID THE FUCKER BREATHE A WORD TO OUR SO FUCKING CALLED "CONGRESS"?

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did a Google AI search on the legality of the attack on Iran (Original Post) orangecrush Saturday OP
Since when did Trump ever worry about legality? Ocelot II Saturday #1
Useless CloudWatcher Saturday #2
This is why the court ruling that the Toddler can federalize National Guard units at will was a very very bad thing. Hugin Saturday #3
Believe Obama ordered strikes without Congressional Approval. That's not saying I agree with trump. Silent Type Saturday #4
We are a lot more threatened now orangecrush Saturday #5

Hugin

(36,296 posts)
3. This is why the court ruling that the Toddler can federalize National Guard units at will was a very very bad thing.
Sat Jun 21, 2025, 08:49 PM
Saturday

Again, Checks and Balances.

Silent Type

(10,104 posts)
4. Believe Obama ordered strikes without Congressional Approval. That's not saying I agree with trump.
Sat Jun 21, 2025, 08:51 PM
Saturday

Notice the last paragraph in OP under Exceptions. I think trump probably acted lawfully, but not morally or in anyone’s best interest. Though one could argue,
we are not threatened, not sure we’d win that in public opinion.

orangecrush

(25,179 posts)
5. We are a lot more threatened now
Sat Jun 21, 2025, 08:57 PM
Saturday

It's open season on Americans.

BTW, MAGATs, ENJOY THOSE GAS PRICES FOR YOUR F-250!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did a Google AI search on...