Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TheProle

(3,810 posts)
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 05:38 PM Sep 22

Keystone Cops - "Trump Officials Didn't Know If His Order to Prosecute Foes Was Meant to Be Secret"

Many observers wondered whether Trump’s initial post, which capped off a wildly authoritarian week, was meant to be a private directive to Bondi. Top officials in his administration had the same question. According to three sources familiar with the situation, several senior officials at the Justice Department, and also at the White House, were blindsided by Trump’s message on Saturday night.

Some in the Justice Department were left scratching their heads because the Truth Social post directed at “Pam” read so much like a text message or direct message from the president.

“Yeah, he texts like that,” one Trump adviser says. “It’s a lot like what the president writes online.”

Some administration officials, the sources say, determined that even though it was likely this was another instance of the president accidentally posting a private message publicly, it was best to just carry on, and act like it was a written demand that was always meant for public consumption.


https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-bondi-order-prosecute-enemies-james-schiff-comey-1235432027/
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Keystone Cops - "Trump Officials Didn't Know If His Order to Prosecute Foes Was Meant to Be Secret" (Original Post) TheProle Sep 22 OP
Does this GD story got legs....or will it be buried by this time tomorrow?? NCDem47 Sep 22 #1
One less subpoena needed Bluetus Sep 22 #2
I'd lean towards thinking he meant it for public consumption as a mushroom-wag AZJonnie Sep 22 #3
Although he kind of ruined these prosecutions Diraven Sep 22 #4

NCDem47

(3,190 posts)
1. Does this GD story got legs....or will it be buried by this time tomorrow??
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 05:42 PM
Sep 22

This was HUGE this wekend, and I already feel like its lost it luster or many don't care.

Then again...I don't watch network, cable OR local broadcast news.

Bluetus

(1,796 posts)
2. One less subpoena needed
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 05:47 PM
Sep 22

Bondi had better understand he was asking her to do a crime that has a statute of limitations beyond 2028. Maybe the SCOTUS says Trump can't be prosecuted for this, but Bondi sure as hell can. So she has better watch her step. Maybe we can keep Alligator Alcatraz open just for her and the bribe guy.

(OK, I know. WHICH bridge guy, right? I was referring to Homan, but it could be any of hundreds in this administration.)

AZJonnie

(2,028 posts)
3. I'd lean towards thinking he meant it for public consumption as a mushroom-wag
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 06:03 PM
Sep 22

E.G. "Look, the DoJ does my political bidding, and nobody can stop me". The past shows he likes to admit criminal shit he does, so when the public sees nothing happen to him, they believe either he's invincible, OR that whatever it is, it must not be a crime, because he's openly admitting it.

Trump is freaking stupid in a lot of ways, but he's also a master criminal and manipulator. And he's clearly familiar with the intelligence term "limited hangout".

Diraven

(1,719 posts)
4. Although he kind of ruined these prosecutions
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 06:09 PM
Sep 22

Defense exhibit 1 of any case is going to be Trump's order to maliciously prosecute them despite a lack of evidence.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Keystone Cops - "Trump Of...