General Discussion

Miles Archer

(20,538 posts) Mon Sep 29, 2025, 11:36 AM Sep 29

The Trump Organization (formerly "Supreme") Court will consider Maxwell's appeal to reverse conviction

I think what surprises me most is that when this came up as a possibility, people were actually asking "WILL they?" "WON'T they?"

OF COURSE THEY WILL. And if they reverse it, it will be a 100% guarantee that she takes anything she knows about Trump to her grave.

Supreme Court to consider Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal to reverse sex trafficking conviction

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Trump Organization (formerly "Supreme") Court will consider Maxwell's appeal to reverse conviction (Original Post) Miles Archer Sep 29 OP

Wow. Just wow. underpants Sep 29 #1

oh :puke: Eugene Sep 29 #2

Well the Trump government basically said she did nothing wrong newdeal2 Sep 29 #3

I'd bet a paycheck she's out by this time next year. Torchlight Sep 29 #4

Maybe one or more are on the Epstein list! Chasstev365 Sep 29 #7

OP headline is misleading Jersey Devil Sep 29 #5

Got the title right for the former Supreme Court. republianmushroom Sep 29 #6

Sooo, the Supreme Court is now in the pardon process? Baitball Blogger Sep 29 #8

My own personal thoughts...... MaeScott Sep 29 #9

This is the normal process. Ms. Toad Sep 29 #10

underpants

(193,494 posts)

1. Wow. Just wow.

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Mon Sep 29, 2025, 11:39 AM

Sep 29

We all know MAGA is a cult and will do whatever Dear Leader says but this is a biggee still to them.

Eugene

(66,495 posts)

2. oh :puke:

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Mon Sep 29, 2025, 11:41 AM

Sep 29

so the fix is in

newdeal2

(4,341 posts)

3. Well the Trump government basically said she did nothing wrong

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Mon Sep 29, 2025, 11:41 AM

Sep 29

There was no trafficking or client list or anything per Bondi and Kash. All the girls were for Epstein. So if there was no crime, why is she in prison?

Torchlight

(5,894 posts)

4. I'd bet a paycheck she's out by this time next year.

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Mon Sep 29, 2025, 11:42 AM

Sep 29

Ministry of Just Us is only getting started.

Chasstev365

(6,460 posts)

7. Maybe one or more are on the Epstein list!

Reply to Torchlight (Reply #4)

Mon Sep 29, 2025, 11:53 AM

Sep 29

Jersey Devil

(10,511 posts)

5. OP headline is misleading

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Mon Sep 29, 2025, 11:48 AM

Sep 29

A petition for certiorari is pending. SCOTUS had NOT granted that petition and decided to hear her appeal. If and when they do that will be the time for a headline. Until then it is just clickbait.

republianmushroom

(21,659 posts)

6. Got the title right for the former Supreme Court.

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Mon Sep 29, 2025, 11:53 AM

Sep 29

Baitball Blogger

(51,142 posts)

8. Sooo, the Supreme Court is now in the pardon process?

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Mon Sep 29, 2025, 12:06 PM

Sep 29

MaeScott

(938 posts)

9. My own personal thoughts......

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Mon Sep 29, 2025, 12:15 PM

Sep 29

Orange Cockwomble’s modeling agency exploited its “models” in many ways. Why not a pipeline to Jeffrey? 🤷🏽‍♀️

Ms. Toad

(37,889 posts)

10. This is the normal process.

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Mon Sep 29, 2025, 12:18 PM

Sep 29

Anyone with an appellate judgment against them has the right to ask the supreme Court to review the case by submitting a petition for a writ of certiorari. The court then decides to grant (hear it) or deny (not hear) it.

This is the step the case is at. She had submitted her petition (as is her right), and the court is now deciding whether to hear the appeal or not (as they do with all petitions). The court grants very few petitions.

The court has not decided to hear her appeal yet.

Reply to this discussion