General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUndergarment upgrades bring many Mormon women comfort and joy
https://apnews.com/article/latter-day-saints-mormon-church-women-garments-51c0980d9e2db5d3b4982875a169add6Undergarment upgrades bring many Mormon women comfort and joy
By HANNAH SCHOENBAUM, DEEPA BHARATH and HOLLY MEYER
Updated 8:57 PM CDT, October 28, 2025
SALT LAKE CITY (AP) Sleeveless versions of the sacred undergarments worn by members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints flew off the shelves on their first day available in the U.S., marking a momentous occasion for many women in the faith who say they no longer need to trade comfort to feel close to God.
Social media was abuzz with pictures of long lines of mostly women waiting for their chance to get inside specialty stores to buy the new items Tuesday.
Enthusiasm for the new garments, worn under modest street clothes by members of what is widely known as the Mormon church, is not just about all the outfits they can more easily wear over a tank top. The introduction of more breathable fabrics and styles for the typically two-piece white garments is key, especially for those who struggle to wear them for medical reasons or live in warm climates.
I think that its great that they are considering the needs of women, said Amanda Shirley, a church member from Salt Lake City who was shopping for the garments Tuesday. She knows some women who struggle with the old cotton and polyester garments due to health problems, including gynecological issues.
While the symbolism of the garments is more important to Shirley than comfort, shes excited for a more breathable alternative. She considers the churchs introduction of new garments forward-thinking.
...
Irish_Dem
(77,005 posts)Ocelot II
(128,013 posts)Irish_Dem
(77,005 posts)Ocelot II
(128,013 posts)but the underwear thing applies to both genders.
Skittles
(168,322 posts)they choose to participate in this utter nonsense
Irish_Dem
(77,005 posts)When I was a child there was a strict dress code for females attending mass.
I had no choice.
And if my mother wanted to attend Mass she had to adhere to the rules.
But yes at some point my mother stopped attending Mass.
When the pope came out against birth control she dumped the church.
Skittles
(168,322 posts)but as adults women can think for themselves, unless the grooming from religious bullshit is permanent
Irish_Dem
(77,005 posts)It is more than a religion it is a culture and family.
Skittles
(168,322 posts)some grooming is permanent
Happy Hoosier
(9,189 posts)Last edited Thu Oct 30, 2025, 11:29 AM - Edit history (1)
And tradition isnt a good reason to believe nonsense.
Irish_Dem
(77,005 posts)She was done when the Pope came out against birth control.
Happy Hoosier
(9,189 posts)I probably stopped believing in my late teens, but didnt really admit it until my mid-20s. I still follow some cultural traditions Christmas Carols that sort of thing. I recognize the importance of religion to our culture and history, but I want to believe true things, not what makes me comfortable.
Irish_Dem
(77,005 posts)what the nuns were telling me in (Catholic) school.
My mother was so shocked she was speechless.
I learned to keep my mouth shut after that.
But what the nuns were telling me was nonsense and I knew it.
As a young child.
viva la
(4,371 posts)At least it was better than a hat. I guess it's some weird Abrahamic suspicion about the evil of women's hair.
electric_blue68
(24,636 posts)Irish_Dem
(77,005 posts)before mass with a bobby pin.
3catwoman3
(28,020 posts)...and it a hat/veil/doily was not available, a piece of Kleenex would do. Even as a kid, I thought that was pretty ridiculous.
catholic services I have been to are weddings and funerals. Never saw any children wearing doilies on their heads. Was that a long ago tradition?
ananda
(33,808 posts)was pretty strict.
I wore uniforms to school for 12 years, and we had
to cover our heads in church. Only dresses, not
pants.
When I was a junior or senior in college, the codes
finally started to loosen. Hippie clothes were
especially cool -- bell bottoms, halter tops, hot
pants, and cool hats.
I guess this is putting me into a bout of nostalgia
now.
Irish_Dem
(77,005 posts)I just meant in general.
Irish_Dem
(77,005 posts)Bell bottoms, halter tops.
Granny dresses.
My grandfather didn't approve of the halter tops.
He thought his granddaughters were showing their "brassieres" as he called them.
He would say: Why do your mothers let you wear your BRASSIERES all around town.
We loved Grandpa to pieces, he was the best grandfather in the world.
We literally rolled on the floor laughing when he would say this to us.
I tried to explain to him about halter tops, but he just shook his head.
Then one of my aunts who was quite proper, dug up an old picture of GRANDMA
and her sister in the 1920's wearing shorts and halter tops. We showed the picture
to Grandpa of his wife wearing a halter top and he shook his head even more.
musette_sf
(10,433 posts)Did you also do the Kleenex and bobby pin thing in a pinch?
electric_blue68
(24,636 posts)Irish_Dem
(77,005 posts)We must have looked like real dorks.
Diamond_Dog
(38,910 posts)2naSalit
(98,431 posts)Really something, they wear them under their underwear. Going deeper into it is a bit TMI but it isn't pretty no matter how you wear them.
Irish_Dem
(77,005 posts)Secret underwear?
2naSalit
(98,431 posts)I am not sure about most of it but I do know that it is a truly misogynist society that keeps a lot secret from outsiders. I have been told things from those who left the system and have shared rooms on tour with mostly women of the system and it really makes you wonder about a number of things regarding belief systems.
Irish_Dem
(77,005 posts)2naSalit
(98,431 posts)Except lds gurls are virgins until they actually give birth, the having sex part starts early in life for many of them, long before puberty. The child sex abuse incidence rate in lds dominant states is really high. It's a gawd sanctioned rape society as far as I can tell, but that's just my opinion.
Irish_Dem
(77,005 posts)marble falls
(68,992 posts)... are very big on Fee Will.
Irish_Dem
(77,005 posts)They are coerced to be weird.
And it sounds sexually motivated.
marble falls
(68,992 posts)... the Masons. Do you think the Masons weird and sexually motivated?
![]()
Man wearing arm- and head-tefillin at the Western Wall in 2009
Most religions require some sort garment or accessories outsiders "don't get". I'm Lutheran and I don't get the wearing of crosses, since Christ was about life.
WIKI
According to the LDS Church, the temple garments serve a number of purposes. First, the garment provides the member "a constant reminder" of the covenants they made in the temple. Second, the garment "when properly worn ... provides protection against temptation and evil." Wearing the garment is also "an outward expression of an inward commitment" to follow Jesus Christ.[12] General authority Carlos E. Asay adds that the garment "strengthens the wearer to resist temptation, fend off evil influences, and stand firmly for the right."[2]
The nature of the protection believed to be afforded by temple garments is ambiguous and varies between adherents.[1]: 49 Researchers who interviewed a sample of Latter-day Saints who wear the temple garment reported that virtually all wearers expressed a belief that wearing the garment provided "spiritual protection" and encouraged them to keep their covenants.[1]: 49 Some of those interviewed "asserted that the garment also provided physical protection, while others seemed less certain of any physical aspect to protection."[1]: 49 In Mormon folklore, tales are told of Latter-day Saints who credit their temple garments with helping them survive car wrecks, fires, and natural disasters.[5]
In 2014, the LDS Church released an explanatory video online that showed photographs of both temple garments and the outer clothing used in temple worship. The video states that there "is nothing magical or mystical about temple garments."[13]
Irish_Dem
(77,005 posts)marble falls
(68,992 posts)Irish_Dem
(77,005 posts)UpInArms
(53,597 posts)ETA
So glad they arent having to wear burkas
dem4decades
(13,238 posts)UpInArms
(53,597 posts)And, yet, they are too blind to see
marble falls
(68,992 posts)... who are qualified to go into a Mormon Temple wear them, men and women. One might point out that Utah was a first state to give women the vote and the right to own property.
Brigham Young was asked if he had to chose between educating a son or daughter, he said he would have the daughter educated because men have an easier time make a living without it than women could.
In any LDS ward, there's a Bishop (not paid by the church, he pays for all his expenses), the second power is the woman in charge of the Relief Society.
![]()
Irish_Dem
(77,005 posts)Bok_Tukalo
(4,501 posts)It has embraced modernity.
Response to dalton99a (Original post)
RandySF This message was self-deleted by its author.
Skittles
(168,322 posts)just....pathetic
muriel_volestrangler
(105,087 posts)I'd have thought the original garments that were demanded would have been breathable. How could an official get away with demanding the new polyester when it was introduced?
2naSalit
(98,431 posts)Even in the operating room, ER, or when giving birth! What happens is they are removed except for having them wrapped around an ankle or arm. Seriously, I kind of audited a medical ethics class for three semesters and that's how the nurses to be were instructed to deal with 'the garment' in crisis events.
They also discussed Native American family concerns and other ethical things, was interesting.
Srkdqltr
(9,051 posts)How holy they are because of what they ate or wore and he puts them in hell because they were mean, intolerant and just plane nasty.
Assuming that's true.
JoseBalow
(8,855 posts)leftyladyfrommo
(19,926 posts)Winter wasn't bad but summers are hot and those sleeves looked ugly sticking out on their arms. We called them angelchaps. It was like wearing long Johns .
Blue Owl
(57,758 posts)What are we, back in the 1800's?
leftyladyfrommo
(19,926 posts)were a really soft cotton. But maybe they had lighter weight ones for summer.
They protect against unwanted sex because Mormons were big on sex and big families but they were protection from something - like a St. Christopher medal.
2naSalit
(98,431 posts)Rather than we, are still trying to hang on to the 1800s.
QueerDuck
(411 posts)I always wondered how realistic the tv series "Big Love" was. How much of the soft underbelly did the show expose?
CanonRay
(15,730 posts)I worked a lot all over Utah. I can still spot a polygamous household on the back roads.
Wonder Why
(6,310 posts)Melon
(841 posts)My neighbor is a Mormon and I was raised near them. They dont party next door, kids are respectful, bring me cookies at Christmas. Ive never really had a bad interaction. They dont drink and teach their kids respect.
Scrivener7
(57,600 posts)even more strongly than most other religions. It explains the addiction among Mormon women to plastic surgery. A lot of their value is in their appeal to men rather than in their own intrinsic humanity.
NoRethugFriends
(3,549 posts)Scrivener7
(57,600 posts)mdbl
(7,667 posts)I laughed through the whole thing.
Ritabert
(1,761 posts)PCIntern
(27,743 posts)tracts of land -Monty Python and the Holy Grail