Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJanuary 6 participants say some Trump pardons were not signed at all
https://www.mediamatters.org/donald-trump/right-wing-media-and-republicans-attack-bidens-use-autopen-pardons-january-6The Republican-led House Oversight Committee claimed that former President Joe Bidens executive actions and pardons issued by autopen should be declared null and void bolstering a claim pushed by President Donald Trump and endorsed by right-wing media. Meanwhile, multiple people Trump pardoned for charges related to January 6 said in podcast appearances earlier this year that their pardons didnt include Trump's signature at all.
On October 28, the House Oversight Committee released a report on Bidens mental fitness when he issued actions signed by autopen, claiming that Biden experienced significant mental and physical decline during his presidency, and thus Attorney General Pam Bondi should review whether Bidens pardons are legitimate.
Oversight Chairman James Comer claimed that the autopen actions should be null and void. ABC News noted that Comers comments echo some of President Donald Trump's remarks about Bidens use of autopen -- including saying that the pardons Biden approved should be voided because they were signed using an autopen.
Trumps claim had also spread widely in right-wing media.
However, on the May 14 edition of the Bobby Pickles Podcast, Troy Garrett who pleaded guilty in December 2024 to a felony count related to his conduct at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, and was reportedly a recipient of one of Trumps mass pardons of January 6 participants said that his pardon had no signature at all.
Speaking with host Robert Piccirillo (also known as Bobby Pickles), Garrett said in response to Trumps claim about Biden and the autopen, You didnt even autopen my pardon, bro. You didnt even, like, spit on it, adding, You didnt even sign mine, bro. So what are you talking about, bro? What are you talking about, Trump?
*snip*
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
January 6 participants say some Trump pardons were not signed at all (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Yesterday
OP
Perhaps one reason ICE wears masks is that most of them are in the FBI J6 database.
Lonestarblue
Yesterday
#2
It can be valid. The point here is that Trump is lying about what constitutes a valid pardon.
Nevilledog
Yesterday
#4
Attilatheblond
(7,644 posts)1. Stephen Miller needed a violent gang he could count on
Lonestarblue
(13,060 posts)2. Perhaps one reason ICE wears masks is that most of them are in the FBI J6 database.
sakabatou
(45,463 posts)3. Without the signature, the pardon would be void, correct?
Nevilledog
(54,661 posts)4. It can be valid. The point here is that Trump is lying about what constitutes a valid pardon.
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca4/22-7188/22-7188-2024-02-13.html#:~:text=The%20court%20held%20that%20while%20a%20written,that%20President%20Trump%20actually%20commuted%20his%20sentence.
Justia Opinion Summary
In a federal case before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, the petitioner, James Rosemond, appealed a district court's dismissal of his habeas corpus petition. Rosemond, who was serving multiple life sentences for offenses related to drug trafficking and murder, claimed that his continued detention was unconstitutional because then-President Donald Trump had commuted his sentence to time served during a phone conversation with two of Rosemond's supporters, Jim Brown and Monique Brown. The Browns signed declarations stating that during the December 2020 call, they believed President Trump had decided to commute Rosemond's sentence. However, no clemency warrant or official record of clemency for Rosemond exists, and his clemency petition is still listed as "pending" on the Department of Justices Office of the Pardon Attorney website.
The Court of Appeals affirmed the district courts dismissal of Rosemonds petition. The court held that while a written document is not constitutionally required for a presidential commutation, the evidence provided by Rosemond, namely the Browns' declarations, did not establish that President Trump actually commuted his sentence. The court found that President Trump's alleged statements during the phone call were forward-looking and indicative of a desire to commute Rosemond's sentence in the future, rather than a declaration of a completed act of clemency. The court also noted the established practice of documenting acts of presidential clemency, which was consistently followed by President Trump throughout his presidency, and emphasized the constitutional separation of powers, which vests the clemency power exclusively in the President.
AND
How US Presidents Wield Their Mighty Power to Pardon
https://archive.li/CVBl0
Justia Opinion Summary
In a federal case before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, the petitioner, James Rosemond, appealed a district court's dismissal of his habeas corpus petition. Rosemond, who was serving multiple life sentences for offenses related to drug trafficking and murder, claimed that his continued detention was unconstitutional because then-President Donald Trump had commuted his sentence to time served during a phone conversation with two of Rosemond's supporters, Jim Brown and Monique Brown. The Browns signed declarations stating that during the December 2020 call, they believed President Trump had decided to commute Rosemond's sentence. However, no clemency warrant or official record of clemency for Rosemond exists, and his clemency petition is still listed as "pending" on the Department of Justices Office of the Pardon Attorney website.
The Court of Appeals affirmed the district courts dismissal of Rosemonds petition. The court held that while a written document is not constitutionally required for a presidential commutation, the evidence provided by Rosemond, namely the Browns' declarations, did not establish that President Trump actually commuted his sentence. The court found that President Trump's alleged statements during the phone call were forward-looking and indicative of a desire to commute Rosemond's sentence in the future, rather than a declaration of a completed act of clemency. The court also noted the established practice of documenting acts of presidential clemency, which was consistently followed by President Trump throughout his presidency, and emphasized the constitutional separation of powers, which vests the clemency power exclusively in the President.
AND
How US Presidents Wield Their Mighty Power to Pardon
https://archive.li/CVBl0
the nelm
(191 posts)5. The idiot that keeps on giving...
He'll probably say he thought it or something equally non-sensical...