General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOh, so now we have a "framework" for Greenland
This after the fucking pedophile met with Rutte in private and I'm pretty sure the latter read the fucking economic riot act to the bloated carcass.
TACO gotta TACO.
Epstein now.
Chasstev365
(7,229 posts)C_U_L8R
(49,005 posts)One day, Trumps follies will drag them all down.
Meanwhile, all we can do is groan and snicker.
malaise
(293,417 posts)A concept of a framework
Disaffected
(6,199 posts)so sez the great negotiator.
Now, what fresh hell awaits tomorrow?
Taco, taco, taco-o,
Taco all the time,
Taco, taco, taco-o,
Soon the world is mine.
Lovie777
(21,981 posts)Scrivener7
(58,534 posts)Not to say he won't go back to it, but it seems like they somehow appeased him.
Jesus. We're all just trying to duck the toddler with the nuclear warhead.
CoopersDad
(3,287 posts)I hate that Southwest Air doesn't have any live news except Fox and CNN.
CNN painted it like a win for the felon.
Jersey Devil
(10,760 posts)The framework will be released in two weeks along with the Republican health care plan.
LetMyPeopleVote
(175,724 posts)There is no framework just like there was no health care plan
President Donald Trump claimed to have a "framework of a future deal" regarding Greenland without saying whether it would become part of the United States as he had vowed it would.
— Raw Story (@rawstory.com) 2026-01-21T19:50:46Z
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-announcement-greenland
"Based upon a very productive meeting that I have had with the Secretary General of NATO, Mark Rutte, we have formed the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and, in fact, the entire Arctic Region," Trump wrote in a Wednesday Truth Social post from Switzerland.
"This solution, if consummated, will be a great one for the United States of America, and all NATO Nations. Based upon this understanding, I will not be imposing the Tariffs that were scheduled to go into effect on February 1st," he added....
Trump made no mention of whether leaders from Denmark were consulted. Earlier on Wednesday, the U.S. president ruled out using military force to take control of Greenland.
LetMyPeopleVote
(175,724 posts)UTUSN
(77,140 posts)haele
(15,133 posts)We can put two bases there, and our Navy ships and subs can pull into port, while no Soviet or Communist Chinese ships or subs can come into Greenland Waters.
Any business interests or non-NATO operations on Greenland (resource extraction, processing plants, ect...) need to get permission from both the US and Denmark.
Okay, gives a bit too much to the US, but reasonable enough. Maybe they gave him another base location, or will allow the Navy to build up a port facility.