Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(43,039 posts)
Wed Jan 21, 2026, 08:50 PM 10 hrs ago

PBS is 'all in' for covering Jack Smith's testimony in the House Judiciary hearing tomorrow, Thursday, 10 a.m.

In a closed-door meeting with lawmakers in December, Smith acknowledged the president's threats levied at his political enemies.

"I am eyes wide open that this president will seek retribution against me if he can," he said.

Smith also said then that he had "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" in the case against Trump, and batted down suggestions that he pursued a politically motivated case against the president.

Now, in front of cameras, he'll have the chance to say more to the American public.

The nightly PBS News Hour broadcast will have major takeaways from the hourslong hearing.

... follow the PBS News' coverage on YouTube, Facebook, X and Bluesky and see highlights on our Instagram and TikTok.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-live-jack-smith-testifies-about-trump-criminal-investigations



13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
PBS is 'all in' for covering Jack Smith's testimony in the House Judiciary hearing tomorrow, Thursday, 10 a.m. (Original Post) ancianita 10 hrs ago OP
The Eleventh Circuit put a time table of Jan 3 to Cannon. Where is their decision??? nt in2herbs 9 hrs ago #1
Here's what I've learned... ancianita 9 hrs ago #6
K&R UTUSN 9 hrs ago #2
I'm so looking forward to this. greatauntoftriplets 9 hrs ago #3
Why in the world are the rethugs letting him testify publicly? Takket 9 hrs ago #4
To keep their jobs at the midterm by appearing to do their jobs now? pfffft who knows... ancianita 9 hrs ago #7
For those not able to watch in the day, not to worry, it will be on YouTube later. mysteryowl 9 hrs ago #5
I hope Lawrence O'Donnell analyzes the event tomorrow night. ancianita 9 hrs ago #8
Rachel Maddow has a special starting at 7 or 8 pm. mysteryowl 9 hrs ago #9
Great! Thanks! Then that will include other MSNOW people. ancianita 9 hrs ago #10
Yep, it will most likely be a panel helping us understand things. mysteryowl 9 hrs ago #11
It'll be real interesting to see if and how Trump sics his DOJ on Mr Smith. Marie Marie 7 hrs ago #12
'nother K! UTUSN 7 hrs ago #13

ancianita

(43,039 posts)
6. Here's what I've learned...
Wed Jan 21, 2026, 09:26 PM
9 hrs ago

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, on November 3, 2025, issued an order setting a 60-day deadline for U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon to rule on motions to release special counsel Jack Smith's report regarding the investigation into Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents.

Records indicate that Judge Cannon ruled on these matters on December 22, 2025, denying the requests to intervene to lift her injunction on releasing the report.

Next Steps:
Following Judge Cannon's denial on December 22, 2025, the Knight Institute and American Oversight filed a notice of appeal on December 23, 2025, moving the issue back to the Eleventh Circuit.

The Eleventh Circuit criticized Cannon for "undue delay" in her handling of the case, and their November 2025 order threatened further action if she did not act by the deadline.

Worth considering... though a judge like Cannon cannot be removed by the circuit judges, she can be impeached in Congress and convicted by the Senate.

Further consider that unethical behavior by a judge can be grounds for impeachment.

Unethical behavior involves actions violating codes of conduct, eroding public trust, and includes bias, conflicts of interest, improper courtroom conduct (rudeness, prejudice), mishandling cases (delays, prejudging), and using the office for personal gain, even personal conduct outside the court that undermines judicial integrity, like criminal acts or discriminatory behavior.

Core ethical violations:
Bias and Prejudice: Showing favoritism or prejudice against parties, lawyers, or witnesses based on race, gender, religion, or other personal factors, or having preconceived notions about case outcomes.

Conflicts of Interest: Allowing personal, financial, or political relationships to influence judicial decisions, or failing to disqualify oneself when a conflict exists.

Improper Demeanor: Being discourteous, rude, abusive, or showing a lack of patience and dignity in court.

Misuse of Office: Using the prestige or power of the judicial office to help oneself or others, accepting bribes or gifts, or seeking special treatment.

Failure to Follow Law/Procedure: Disregarding legal procedures, failing to make timely decisions, or violating rules of evidence or conduct.

Ex Parte Communications: Holding private, improper discussions with one side of a case without the other party present.

What Jack Smith knows about Aileen Cannon could be relevant in a completely different venue, say, as a witness before a Judiciary committee.

Takket

(23,509 posts)
4. Why in the world are the rethugs letting him testify publicly?
Wed Jan 21, 2026, 09:17 PM
9 hrs ago

I can’t fathom what good they think will come of that for them.

ancianita

(43,039 posts)
7. To keep their jobs at the midterm by appearing to do their jobs now? pfffft who knows...
Wed Jan 21, 2026, 09:27 PM
9 hrs ago

mysteryowl

(8,303 posts)
5. For those not able to watch in the day, not to worry, it will be on YouTube later.
Wed Jan 21, 2026, 09:23 PM
9 hrs ago

Or pbs.org will have it on their website during and afterwards.

ancianita

(43,039 posts)
8. I hope Lawrence O'Donnell analyzes the event tomorrow night.
Wed Jan 21, 2026, 09:28 PM
9 hrs ago

Last edited Wed Jan 21, 2026, 10:10 PM - Edit history (1)

Marie Marie

(10,965 posts)
12. It'll be real interesting to see if and how Trump sics his DOJ on Mr Smith.
Wed Jan 21, 2026, 11:19 PM
7 hrs ago

I know that he really really really wants to but I'm not sure if he will. He has no one in the DOJ that is remotely qualified to take on Jack and I think he knows it. There are some people, not often, that he backs away from trying to bully. As Trump always says: "Well, we'll have to wait and see what happens."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»PBS is 'all in' for cover...