Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublicans are normalizing the one reform they should fear most - Ian Millhiser @ Vox
Vox - Gift LinkUtahs Republican governor, Spencer Cox, signed legislation over the weekend that will add two seats to his states supreme court seats that Cox plans to fill shortly. The law is widely viewed as an effort to move Utahs highest court to the right after it handed down several decisions that Republicans disliked.
In September, the pre-packed Utah Supreme Court sided with plaintiffs challenging Utahs GOP-friendly congressional maps. According to the Salt Lake Tribune, in recent years, Utah courts also blocked Utahs ban on most abortions, temporarily stopped a law banning transgender girls from playing high school sports, and found the states school voucher program unconstitutional.
Court-packing, or adding seats to a court in order to change its ideological or partisan makeup, is often spoken of as if it were the political equivalent of detonating a nuclear weapon. In 1937, shortly after winning reelection in a landslide, President Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed adding six seats to a US Supreme Court that frequently sabotaged his New Deal policies. But, even at the height of his power, Roosevelt struggled to build support for his plan. Some historians blame his court-packing proposal for shattering the New Deal coalition in Congress.
Since then, national leaders have typically spoken of court-packing with trepidation. In 2020, for example, as Republicans were consolidating their 6-3 supermajority on the US Supreme Court, then-presidential candidate Joe Biden warned that he was not a fan of court-packing as a solution to Republican partisanship on the high court.
But, at the state level, Republicans now engage in court-packing often enough that it has become just a normal part of partisan judicial politics. In 2016, Republicans in Georgia and Arizona did the same thing Utah just did, adding seats to their state supreme courts in an apparent effort to move those courts to the right. So thats three packed supreme courts in a single decade.
In September, the pre-packed Utah Supreme Court sided with plaintiffs challenging Utahs GOP-friendly congressional maps. According to the Salt Lake Tribune, in recent years, Utah courts also blocked Utahs ban on most abortions, temporarily stopped a law banning transgender girls from playing high school sports, and found the states school voucher program unconstitutional.
Court-packing, or adding seats to a court in order to change its ideological or partisan makeup, is often spoken of as if it were the political equivalent of detonating a nuclear weapon. In 1937, shortly after winning reelection in a landslide, President Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed adding six seats to a US Supreme Court that frequently sabotaged his New Deal policies. But, even at the height of his power, Roosevelt struggled to build support for his plan. Some historians blame his court-packing proposal for shattering the New Deal coalition in Congress.
Since then, national leaders have typically spoken of court-packing with trepidation. In 2020, for example, as Republicans were consolidating their 6-3 supermajority on the US Supreme Court, then-presidential candidate Joe Biden warned that he was not a fan of court-packing as a solution to Republican partisanship on the high court.
But, at the state level, Republicans now engage in court-packing often enough that it has become just a normal part of partisan judicial politics. In 2016, Republicans in Georgia and Arizona did the same thing Utah just did, adding seats to their state supreme courts in an apparent effort to move those courts to the right. So thats three packed supreme courts in a single decade.
Republicans are normalizing the one reform they should fear most www.vox.com/politics/477...
— Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser.bsky.social) 2026-02-02T20:16:32.500Z
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans are normalizing the one reform they should fear most - Ian Millhiser @ Vox (Original Post)
In It to Win It
Yesterday
OP
The idea is that it provides a rationale or permission structure for Dems to do it to the US Supreme Court
In It to Win It
Yesterday
#3
synni
(701 posts)1. And they should fear this why?
They are getting everything they want. We are the ones who should fear this.
In It to Win It
(12,500 posts)3. The idea is that it provides a rationale or permission structure for Dems to do it to the US Supreme Court
But my hopes arent very high that Dems would do it if they have a trifecta
msongs
(73,209 posts)2. it's only good when dems are in control. when repubs are in control it's bad. works both ways nt