Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(135,001 posts)
Wed Mar 4, 2026, 08:19 PM Mar 4

Despite a $200 billion price tag, Trump admits the Iran war could just swap one bad leader for another

As the conflict in Iran stretches into its fourth day and threatens to spill over into the wider region, the staggering financial and strategic costs the U.S. is incurring to fuel its military efforts are colliding with a sobering admission from the Oval Office.

Since military strikes targeting Iran’s leadership began on Saturday, the Trump administration has provided several explanations to justify its campaign, although it has refrained from explicitly mentioning a change in leadership as a clear-cut goal—despite its outcome so far effectively amounting to a decapitation. Over the weekend, President Donald Trump claimed initial strikes had killed as many as 48 members of Iran’s leadership, including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

“This is not a so-called regime-change war, but the regime sure did change,” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said during public remarks Monday.

-snip-

“The worst case would be we do this, and then somebody takes over who’s as bad as the previous person,” Trump said during public remarks Tuesday, outlining a worst-case scenario that might mirror the very instability the military operation was ostensibly designed to resolve.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/despite-200-billion-price-tag-174100128.html

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Despite a $200 billion pr...