Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(80,216 posts)
Sat Jun 6, 2026, 10:24 AM 13 hrs ago

Right floats conspiracies as Pratt sinks


Right-wing media melts down as Spencer Pratt sinks in vote count
Trump administration launched a federal probe as Republicans fall behind in California primaries

By Sophia Tesfaye
Senior Writer
Published June 6, 2026 6:30AM (EDT)


(Salon) Spencer Pratt was never going to be the mayor of Los Angeles. That is not necessarily a humiliation for the longtime reality TV star. But now his unconventional campaign, forged in the aftermath of losing his Pacific Palisades home in the January 2025 fires, is quickly giving way to a predictable right-wing meltdown over California’s elections.

Almost immediately after the polls closed on June 2, prominent conservative media personalities began aggressively promoting completely deluded claims that Democrats were actively stealing the election. On Fox News, host Laura Ingraham suggested California might have “the most corrupt voting system in the Western world.” Will Cain floated the idea that votes could be “manufactured” during the counting process. Sean Hannity amplified Donald Trump’s baseless claim that Democrats were “probably cheating” in California. Podcaster Benny Johnson claimed that “you can already see that they’re stealing and they’re cheating.” Right-wing provocateur Chris Rufo baselessly claimed that “the Dem machine has rigged election law in its favor.” Right-leaning polling firm Rasmussen claimed Pratt received zero votes in a ballot drop — a suggestion immediately contradicted by official L.A. County Registrar data, which showed Pratt receiving thousands of votes in every single update.

This kind of misinformation is not a harmless error. It feeds a broader narrative that the system is fundamentally untrustworthy, priming audiences to reject any result that doesn’t align with their preferences.

Perhaps the most revealing moment came from Megyn Kelly, who on her podcast took the “election fraud” grievance in a different direction. Rather than simply attacking election officials, she turned her fire on the voters themselves, ranting about mail-in voting: “Do we really want to make it that convenient? I mean these are lazy-ass people. If they can’t get off their fat asses and get to election polling stations on Election Day, then we don’t want you.” The mask slipped entirely. The objection was never about fraud. The objection is about voter participation. Specifically, the participation of people who tend not to vote Republican. ....................(more)

https://www.salon.com/2026/06/06/right-wing-media-melts-down-spencer-pratt-vote-count/




10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

underpants

(197,470 posts)
1. Yes it was instantaneous. The election served a purpose regardless
Sat Jun 6, 2026, 10:32 AM
13 hrs ago

of the foreseeable result.

chicoescuela

(3,266 posts)
3. By definition , tsf is one of these fat lazy people who won't get to the polls on Election Day.
Sat Jun 6, 2026, 10:43 AM
13 hrs ago

We don’t want him either

RedWhiteBlueIsRacist

(2,346 posts)
4. I see Mannequin Megyn attacked mail-in voting. Surely, she must know Trump voted by mail recently.
Sat Jun 6, 2026, 11:16 AM
12 hrs ago

Is she calling him a lazy fat ass? LOL.

Mannequin Megyn Kelly: “Do we really want to make it that convenient? I mean these are lazy-ass people. If they can’t get off their fat asses and get to election polling stations on Election Day, then we don’t want you.” The mask slipped entirely. The objection was never about fraud. The objection is about voter participation. Specifically, the participation of people who tend not to vote Republican..."

struggle4progress

(126,888 posts)
5. "Pratt has indicated that he will leave Los Angeles if he is not elected"
Sat Jun 6, 2026, 11:45 AM
12 hrs ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spencer_Pratt

LA seems to be responding: Really! Is that a promise?

LetMyPeopleVote

(183,000 posts)
7. Lawrence: Trump is a big loser in California and in Congress
Sat Jun 6, 2026, 12:11 PM
11 hrs ago

O'Donnell why neither trump nor Pratt won anything last night.


Pratt has no chance of winning the general election in November

PatSeg

(53,778 posts)
10. Whoa, Megyn Kelly said that?
Sat Jun 6, 2026, 04:26 PM
7 hrs ago

"Lazy-ass" people? Does she have any idea why many people vote by mail? If I can't get a mail in ballot, I wouldn't be able to vote at all and I know there are many like me.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Right floats conspiracies...