Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
'Out of their minds': DOJ's 'bulldozer' threat to Statue of Liberty astonishes
Oral arguments on the Ballroom litigation did not go well
A Justice Department lawyer astonished onlookers by arguing in federal court that the Trump administration could "bulldoze" the Statue of Liberty if they moved too quickly to be stopped.
— Raw Story (@rawstory.com) 2026-06-05T16:40:35.976Z
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-administration-statue-of-liberty
A Justice Department lawyer astonished onlookers by arguing in federal court that the Trump administration could "bulldoze" the Statue of Liberty if they moved too quickly to be stopped.
The lawyer appeared Friday morning for oral arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit over President Donald Trump's controversial White House ballroom project, which is under construction on the site of East Wing he ordered demolished last year without warning, and Judge Patricia Millett pressed the attorney on the matter.
"If the government decides very quickly to bulldoze the Statue of Liberty, the people whose ancestors — that was the first thing they saw coming to this country, but the govt moved too fast — nothing can be done?" she asked, according to Politico's Kyle Cheney, who was in the courtroom.
"I think that's right, yes," agreed the attorney, who was not identified by the reporter.
The courtroom exchange stunned social media users.
"They’re out of their minds," marveled Fox News contributor Jessica Tarlov.
The lawyer appeared Friday morning for oral arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit over President Donald Trump's controversial White House ballroom project, which is under construction on the site of East Wing he ordered demolished last year without warning, and Judge Patricia Millett pressed the attorney on the matter.
"If the government decides very quickly to bulldoze the Statue of Liberty, the people whose ancestors — that was the first thing they saw coming to this country, but the govt moved too fast — nothing can be done?" she asked, according to Politico's Kyle Cheney, who was in the courtroom.
"I think that's right, yes," agreed the attorney, who was not identified by the reporter.
The courtroom exchange stunned social media users.
"They’re out of their minds," marveled Fox News contributor Jessica Tarlov.
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
DOJ argues Trump could 'bulldoze' Statue of Liberty during White House ballroom hearing
The Justice Department argued no one can stop Trump from building the ballroom.
By Steven Portnoy and Peter Charalambous
June 5, 2026, 2:50 PM ET • 6 min read
{snip video}
A lawyer for the Justice Department told a federal appeals court panel on Friday that the Trump administration believes the White House ballroom project cannot be stopped by judges, and that even if the president wanted to "bulldoze" the Statue of Liberty, no one could sue to stop him.
"Let me ask you a straightforward question: that this court, the Supreme Court, no court could stop the building of this [ballroom]?" asked Judge Patricia Millett, an Obama appointee. ... "Yes," answered Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Yaakov Roth. ... Roth said the controversial project is "well on its way," with more than 3 million pounds of steel rebar now on site. ... "I think it would have been improper to enjoin it, even on day one," Roth said.
{snip}
DOJ attorney Roth argued that the organization lacked standing in part because the court could not correct the alleged harm, since the former East Wing has already been demolished and construction on its replacement is now so far along. That led Judge Millett to rebuke what she called the administration's "move fast and break things" approach. ... "If you move fast enough, nobody has standing to challenge it?" she asked. ... "I do think that that is correct," Roth said. "The injury, it becomes non-redressable."
When pressed by Millett on a hypothetical circumstance she introduced involving the Statue of Liberty, Roth acknowledged that the same argument would apply if the Trump administration attempted to quickly demolish it. ... "If the government decided to move very quickly to bulldoze the Statue of Liberty," Millett began, pointing to a theoretical lawsuit brought by those whose ancestors saw the statue on arrival. "[If] the government moved too fast, nothing can be done?" ... "I think that's right, yes," Roth said, in a moment that sparked audible gasps in the courtroom.
{snip}
The Justice Department argued no one can stop Trump from building the ballroom.
By Steven Portnoy and Peter Charalambous
June 5, 2026, 2:50 PM ET • 6 min read
{snip video}
A lawyer for the Justice Department told a federal appeals court panel on Friday that the Trump administration believes the White House ballroom project cannot be stopped by judges, and that even if the president wanted to "bulldoze" the Statue of Liberty, no one could sue to stop him.
"Let me ask you a straightforward question: that this court, the Supreme Court, no court could stop the building of this [ballroom]?" asked Judge Patricia Millett, an Obama appointee. ... "Yes," answered Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Yaakov Roth. ... Roth said the controversial project is "well on its way," with more than 3 million pounds of steel rebar now on site. ... "I think it would have been improper to enjoin it, even on day one," Roth said.
{snip}
DOJ attorney Roth argued that the organization lacked standing in part because the court could not correct the alleged harm, since the former East Wing has already been demolished and construction on its replacement is now so far along. That led Judge Millett to rebuke what she called the administration's "move fast and break things" approach. ... "If you move fast enough, nobody has standing to challenge it?" she asked. ... "I do think that that is correct," Roth said. "The injury, it becomes non-redressable."
When pressed by Millett on a hypothetical circumstance she introduced involving the Statue of Liberty, Roth acknowledged that the same argument would apply if the Trump administration attempted to quickly demolish it. ... "If the government decided to move very quickly to bulldoze the Statue of Liberty," Millett began, pointing to a theoretical lawsuit brought by those whose ancestors saw the statue on arrival. "[If] the government moved too fast, nothing can be done?" ... "I think that's right, yes," Roth said, in a moment that sparked audible gasps in the courtroom.
{snip}
Yaakov Roth
Yaakov Roth
Yaakov Roth grew up in Toronto, Canada, and moved to the United States to attend Harvard Law School. He graduated summa cum laude in 2007 and then clerked for Chief Judge Michael Boudin on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and Justice Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court. Since then, he has practiced appellate and Supreme Court litigation at Jones Day, where he is a partner in the Washington, DC, office. Yaakov’s practice focuses on white-collar criminal law, the First Amendment (including religious liberty), and federal statutory schemes such as ERISA, RICO, and Title VII.
Yaakov Roth
Yaakov Roth grew up in Toronto, Canada, and moved to the United States to attend Harvard Law School. He graduated summa cum laude in 2007 and then clerked for Chief Judge Michael Boudin on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and Justice Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court. Since then, he has practiced appellate and Supreme Court litigation at Jones Day, where he is a partner in the Washington, DC, office. Yaakov’s practice focuses on white-collar criminal law, the First Amendment (including religious liberty), and federal statutory schemes such as ERISA, RICO, and Title VII.
Link to tweet
This is fucking insane.
The Trump DOJ just stood in federal court and said with a straight face that the authoritarian regime could bulldoze the Statue of Liberty tomorrow — and there's nothing anyone could do about it.
When a judge asked point-blank: "If the government decides to destroy the Statue of Liberty before anyone can sue… nothing can be done?" The DOJ lawyer answered: "I think that's right, yes."
Let that sink in.
They're openly admitting they believe Trump has the power to erase one of America's most sacred symbols — the literal beacon of freedom for millions of immigrants — and the courts can't stop them in time.
This is authoritarian, dangerous, un-American bullshit.
The Statue of Liberty isn't their property to demolish on a whim. It belongs to the American people.
Wake the hell up, y'all!
The Trump DOJ just stood in federal court and said with a straight face that the authoritarian regime could bulldoze the Statue of Liberty tomorrow — and there's nothing anyone could do about it.
When a judge asked point-blank: "If the government decides to destroy the Statue of Liberty before anyone can sue… nothing can be done?" The DOJ lawyer answered: "I think that's right, yes."
Let that sink in.
They're openly admitting they believe Trump has the power to erase one of America's most sacred symbols — the literal beacon of freedom for millions of immigrants — and the courts can't stop them in time.
This is authoritarian, dangerous, un-American bullshit.
The Statue of Liberty isn't their property to demolish on a whim. It belongs to the American people.
Wake the hell up, y'all!
