Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court says Exxon can sue Cuba over $1B in seized property
Link to tweet
?s=46
The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that oil giant Exxon Mobil can sue the Cuban government over more than $1 billion in seized property, potentially giving the United States greater financial leverage over the cash-strapped country.
In a 6-3 decision split along ideological lines, Justice Brett Kavanaugh said that state-owned companies can't argue they are protected by sovereign immunity to fight litigation over assets seized by Cuba's communist government.
The decision -- as well as a similar case last month when the Supreme Court ruled companies can be held liable for using seized property -- comes as the Trump administration ratchets pressure on the struggling island nation through embargoes and a criminal indictment of former leader Raul Castro. The decision could open the door to more litigation over assets seized by the Cuban government, adding pressure to the economically distressed country.
The case revolved around the interpretation of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act of 1996, also known as the Helms-Burton Act, which was passed by Congress after Cuba shot down two unarmed planes flown by humanitarian organization Brothers to the Rescue. The law established the right of U.S. nationals to sue over property seized by the Cuban government, though every president until President Donald Trump waived that provision.
In a 6-3 decision split along ideological lines, Justice Brett Kavanaugh said that state-owned companies can't argue they are protected by sovereign immunity to fight litigation over assets seized by Cuba's communist government.
The decision -- as well as a similar case last month when the Supreme Court ruled companies can be held liable for using seized property -- comes as the Trump administration ratchets pressure on the struggling island nation through embargoes and a criminal indictment of former leader Raul Castro. The decision could open the door to more litigation over assets seized by the Cuban government, adding pressure to the economically distressed country.
The case revolved around the interpretation of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act of 1996, also known as the Helms-Burton Act, which was passed by Congress after Cuba shot down two unarmed planes flown by humanitarian organization Brothers to the Rescue. The law established the right of U.S. nationals to sue over property seized by the Cuban government, though every president until President Donald Trump waived that provision.
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court says Exxon can sue Cuba over $1B in seized property (Original Post)
rollin74
8 hrs ago
OP
2naSalit
(104,739 posts)1. Our courts...
Don't have jurisdiction in other countries who don't acknowledge them.
raccoon
(32,501 posts)2. Then why shouldn't Native Americans get money for what the non-Native Americans took from them,
and African Americans get paid for the labor of their ancestors, or get paid back in the land that THEY cultivated?
Jeez....this SCOTUS are/is awful. Slaves to the ruling class.
struggle4progress
(127,130 posts)3. The hotels that made Cuba a gangster's paradise
By Camilo Smith,
Houston Chronicle
Updated Dec 14, 2015 10:10 a.m.
... Reports have come out that Meyer Lansky's grandson is looking for compensation for the Havana Riviera hotel, which was seized during the Cuban Revolution in 1959, according to an article from EFE ...
https://www.chron.com/news/us-world/article/A-look-back-at-the-hotels-that-made-Cuba-a-6695680.php
Won't someone think of the poor gangsters?
Why would Cuba give a shit what our courts say?
ananda
(35,792 posts)5. I've been wondering why Cuba would even acknowledge the suit.
???