General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPA-10: Perry Calls For Repeal of 17th Amendment and Give State Legislatures Power to Elect Senators
The Capitol Region Republican has signed on as a co-sponsor to Rep. Keith Selfs (R-Texas) resolution (H.J.Res.198) to repeal the 17th Amendment and restore the Founders original vision for the United States Senate by returning the selection of U.S. Senators to state legislatures.
The 17th Amendment, ratified in 1913, allows voters to cast direct votes for U.S. senators. Prior to its passage, senators were chosen by state legislatures.
The current system has given us six-year politicians more focused on national ambitions and the institution of the U.S. Senate than on the states they serve, said Self. Our Founding Fathers designed the Senate to protect state sovereignty and act as a check on federal overreach. If senators are supposed to represent their states, then the states should choose them. Repealing the 17th Amendment will restore that constitutional balance and make the Senate more accountable to the people of Texas and every other state in the union.
According to the National Archives, The Constitution, as it was adopted in 1788, made the Senate an assembly where the states would have equal representation. Each state legislature would elect two senators to six-year terms. Late in the 19th century, some state legislatures deadlocked over the election of a senator when different parties controlled different houses Senate vacancies could last months or years. In other cases, special interests or political machines gained control over the state legislature. Progressive reformers dismissed individuals elected by such legislatures as puppets and the Senate as a millionaires club serving powerful private interests.
https://politicspa.com/perry-calls-for-repeal-of-17th-amendment-and-give-state-legislatures-power-to-elect-senators/149474/
msongs
(74,603 posts)Federal overreach?
Go ask Mad King Donald.
eggplant
(4,264 posts)Why would the people give up their vote?
Dunc
(581 posts)JT45242
(4,258 posts)It was literally like the house of lords, except very indirectly elected.
It is the only not gerrymandered vote for federal legislature or the president available.(The Dakota territory with virtually no people was split into two states to give 3 extra electoral college votes to the party of racism and hatred. )
The apartheid rule plans are so blatant that I feel like we are all living in the novel, cry the beloved country.
mopinko
(74,286 posts)and throw the dakotas in the face of anyone who howls about power grabs.
Stuckinthebush
(11,226 posts)Building a bridge to the 19th century
Lonestarblue
(13,672 posts)Republicans would love to strip minorities of citizenship and prevent women from voting. The only amendment I'd like to see repealed is the 2nd, and that will never happen.
ninjanurse
(151 posts)But not those annoying voters who live in the states. Okay.
John1956PA
(5,155 posts)This goofball call to change the way senators are elected goes back at least as far as the 1990s, even before partisan politics was prominent on the web. I think that the sinister operators who cursed the nation with Limbaugh and Gingrich started it.
