General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis may explain why they are hiding Mitch McConnell's condition
"In Kentucky, a special election to replace a Senator will NOT be called if its closer than 3 months till the next election, Cochran wrote Saturday in a social media post on X. If McConnells condition is clearly unfit for office, theyd hide that to avoid being forced to submit a resignation letter until after that date.
A cheater even on his death bed.
https://www.rawstory.com/mitch-mcconnell-2677159427/
hatrack
(65,411 posts)calimary
(91,642 posts)wnylib
(26,948 posts)cheated out of our celebration parties.
Tree Lady
(13,462 posts)A cousin who had cardiac arrest last week, I believe they are going to unplug the machines this coming week.
I bet it is something like that except they will keep him on the machines until after the 3 month time politically.
wnylib
(26,948 posts)OTOH, even if he was dead and off of machines, MAGAs would keep it secret, if they could. But the chances for leaks then would be greater than if they leave him on machines, even without hope of recovery.
cab67
(3,946 posts)Not for very long.
Too many people at the hospital would know.
Attilatheblond
(9,522 posts)Gotta figure Mitch's room is very private with layers of security and baffles to keep out any noisy employees.
LeftInTX
(35,091 posts)Once you're dead, I think it goes away. You're now public property. Your death is recorded elsewhere and is not just a medical record. Doc pronounces you dead. Then you are removed from the healthcare facility. Your body goes to a funeral home, (if KY is like TX, McConnell, will go straight to a funeral home due to his age and ongoing health issues) Meanwhile legal documents are filed such as death certificates etc.
Death isn't an illness. It is a legal status.
Although your treatment status may be subject to HIPAA after you die, your death status is not.
progressoid
(53,597 posts)Background
The HIPAA Privacy Rule protects the individually identifiable health information about a decedent for 50 years following the date of death of the individual. This period of protection for decedent health information balances the privacy interests of surviving relatives and other individuals with a relationship to the decedent, with the need for archivists, biographers, historians, and others to access old or ancient records on deceased individuals for historical purposes. During the 50-year period of protection, the personal representative of the decedent (i.e., the person under applicable law with authority to act on behalf of the decedent or the decedents estate) has the ability to exercise the rights under the Privacy Rule with regard to the decedents health information, such as authorizing certain uses and disclosures of, and gaining access to, the information. With respect to family members or other persons involved in the individuals health care or payment for care prior to the individuals death, but who are not personal representatives, the Privacy Rule permits a covered entity to disclose the relevant protected health information of the decedent to such persons, unless doing so is inconsistent with any prior expressed preference of the deceased individual that is known to the covered entity.
How the Rule Works
The HIPAA Privacy Rule applies to the individually identifiable health information of a decedent for 50 years following the date of death of the individual. The Rule explicitly excludes from the definition of protected health information individually identifiable health information regarding a person who has been deceased for more than 50 years. See paragraph (2)(iv) of the definition of protected health information at § 160.103. Thus, for example, a HIPAA covered entity that maintains health or medical records, correspondence files, physician diaries and casebooks, or photograph collections that contain identifiable health information on individuals who have been deceased for more than 50 years may use or disclose the information without regard to the Privacy Rule because the information is not considered protected health information.
During the 50-year period of protection, the Privacy Rule generally protects a decedents health information to the same extent the Rule protects the health information of living individuals but does include a number of special disclosure provisions relevant to deceased individuals. These include provisions that permit a covered entity to disclose a decedents health information: (1) to alert law enforcement to the death of the individual, when there is a suspicion that death resulted from criminal conduct (§ 164.512(f)(4)); (2) to coroners or medical examiners and funeral directors (§ 164.512(g)); (3) for research that is solely on the protected health information of decedents (§ 164.512(i)(1)(iii)); and (4) to organ procurement organizations or other entities engaged in the procurement, banking, or transplantation of cadaveric organs, eyes, or tissue for the purpose of facilitating organ, eye, or tissue donation and transplantation (§ 164.512(h)). In addition, the Privacy Rule permits a covered entity to disclose protected health information about a decedent to a family member, or other person who was involved in the individuals health care or payment for care prior to the individuals death, unless doing so is inconsistent with any prior expressed preference of the deceased individual that is known to the covered entity. This may include disclosures to spouses, parents, children, domestic partners, other relatives, or friends of the decedent, provided the information disclosed is limited to that which is relevant to the persons involvement in the decedents care or payment for care. See 45 CFR 164.510(b)(5). For uses or disclosures of a decedents health information not otherwise permitted by the Privacy Rule, a covered entity must obtain a written HIPAA authorization from a personal representative of the decedent who can authorize the disclosure. A decedents personal representative is an executor, administrator, or other person who has authority under applicable State or other law to act on behalf of the decedent or the decedents estate. See 45 CFR 164.502(g)(4), as well as guidance on personal representatives available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/coveredentities/personalreps.html, for more information.
Attilatheblond
(9,522 posts)like the cremation he wanted, getting a copy of the coroner's report, going into probate, selling a property, and provide certified copies of the death certificate to life insurance company, federal employee pension and health insurance, etc. Since I did not take his surname when we married, there were a few more hoops than usual.
HIPAA does count for the recent dead.
cab67
(3,946 posts)I understand there would be all sorts of security, but the number of people involved would all but ensure a leak.
popsdenver
(2,888 posts)and they are keeping him that way, as to not detract from Trump's 250 celebrations...........
If they announced it, the 250 celebrations would be overwhelmed by the massive number of Americans, out in the streets celebrating McConnells passing........
His burial plot needs to be surrounded by acres and acres of concrete pavement with surface drains.....same for Trump's burial site, and many other Republicans graves.....
Dulcinea
(10,520 posts)If he was dead, that wouldn't be kept under wraps for long. Someone would let that news out.
Bengus81
(10,653 posts)Bet they've had him hooked up on life support the entire time. This BS is ghoulish.
Attilatheblond
(9,522 posts)Wife wants to keep her perks?
popsdenver
(2,888 posts)I may be mistaken but I am pretty sure that her parents are Chinese oligarchs, who actually sent a chunk of money via the NRA to Republican candidates in 2016??????
Attilatheblond
(9,522 posts)her family has.
By the way, read, just this morning, that she went to China 3 days after Mitch was treated to CPR and a ride to the hospital. https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/elaine-chao-traveled-to-china-days-after-mitch-mcconnell-s-hospitalization/ar-AA27cHLu]
Think it's possible the shipping company heiress has some international business details to tie up before she has Mitch's life support unplugged?
You know, if I had her resources, I could probably have kept my beloved late husband on life support indefinitely and kept both his and my Social Security pensions while machines kept his heart and lungs going even after his brain had shut down and couldn't operate its own life support. But then, I am not a money triggered ghoul, so I kissed him on the forehead and wept as the machines stopped fighting reality. These 9 years since, I still weep.
erronis
(25,111 posts)Could possibly get 10 more years and 100s of votes out of him.
"Mitch - we are going to pass 10,000 volts through you. If you jerk, we'll call that a 'YES' vote for our party."
Pinback
(13,745 posts)harumph
(3,600 posts)you can be sure the g-damned republicans would do that.
Ponietz
(4,714 posts)allegorical oracle
(6,744 posts)SSJVegeta
(3,506 posts)Especially since these people are on payroll
Bengus81
(10,653 posts)Attilatheblond
(9,522 posts)Gotta figure a BIG reason the Geezers on the Hill won't step down is partly due to staffers who like power and know where the skeletons are refusing to allow retirements.
Tetrachloride
(9,802 posts)RandomNumbers
(19,388 posts)you will get more straight-ticket Rs in November of a midterm or presidential year, and this is a mid term year.
Crunchy Frog
(28,308 posts)Demand proof that they're not pulling a Weekend at Bernie's.
InstantGratification
(452 posts)For all the horrendous things he has done over the years, he has been a solid NO vote on the SAVE act. If KY replaces him in a special election, the replacement will almost be guaranteed to be a YES, I don't want to risk that YES being the one that passes it in the senate since it has already passed in the house.
ToxMarz
(3,213 posts)might it be possible they don't have the votes to confirm a new Supreme Court nominee before the new Congress is seated. Most of them hate Trump enough they might just want to send him a big Fuck You. And if they're dead or dying, that works too. At least we can hope then we take the Senate.
Sector 001
(436 posts)cpamomfromtexas
(1,504 posts)ColoringFool
(1,482 posts)Wifes husband
(796 posts)allegorical oracle
(6,744 posts)of a high-ranking person, I was told I couldn't because I was not a family member.
LeftInTX
(35,091 posts)In Texas, I think they are publically available after 60 years.
Death index is pretty much daily.
Anybody who is sent to the Medical Examiner where I live is put on a public roster availble online. However, ME handles cases which an autopsy is required.
https://deathrecords.bexar.org/

ColoringFool
(1,482 posts)SergeStorms
(21,157 posts)Plenty of coverage about Paul Pelosi hitting a parked car, though, isn't there?
"Liberal" media my ass!
Attilatheblond
(9,522 posts)Medical conditions are not the same and are HIPAA has some teeth
the_liberal_grandpa
(352 posts)One less vote in the Senate for the repubs
allegorical oracle
(6,744 posts)rampartd
(5,726 posts)newdeal2
(5,694 posts)Who exactly is going to determine he is unfit for office and force him out?
He is clearly unwell but they are hiding him to protect his image, not due to a special election.
And theres not much benefit here because Republicans have one less vote while he is MIA.
karynnj
(61,275 posts)He can't vote remotely. If he is alive, they could a la Strom Thurmond bring him in a wheelchair to vote up or down. If he is dead, they have one less vote.
Now, there already is a Democrat and a Republican who have the nominations for November. I wonder if Kentucky law would allow both parties to skip the primary and have an early election. It seems they changed the law twice recently. The first time was to have the Governor pick one of the people on the Republican list (McConnell's party), then to cut the governor out altogether to have a special election. I bet they regret the last change.
I would have thought they would want to get a Trumper replacement in ASAP. Remember, McConnell is a strong defender of the filibuster and is against the SAVE Act. Fortunately, even if they wanted to I don't think they can replace McConnell fast enough to pass and implement the SAVE Act. It does mean if a special election is called Democrats should demand primaries.
Fil1957
(984 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(184,508 posts)Senator Mitch McConnell's freeze-up at a news conference last week is raising questions about how much longer he can serve as the senior U.S. senator for Kentucky. A spokesperson says McConnell plans to finish his term, which ends in 2027, but lawmakers are wondering what could happen if he were to step down. Back in 2021, Kentucky's Republican-led legislature passed a law ensuring that McConnell's possible successor would be a Republican. The state's Democratic governor, Andy Beshear, vetoed the bill, but he was overruled by the legislature. For more, I'm joined now by Austin Horn, who is a politics reporter for the Lexington Herald-Leader. Austin, so what is Governor Beshear's argument against the current law?
AUSTIN HORN: Good morning, A. The argument against, presented in the governor's old veto message, is based on the U.S. Constitution's 17th Amendment. It's kind of one of those amendments we often forget about. And in 1912, it allowed voters to cast direct votes for U.S. senators. And prior to its passage, senators were chosen by legislatures. The governor's office has been careful to not make a comment on this front in recent days. But it's kind of the consensus among Kentucky Democrats and those in the capital that Beshear would be inclined to push back either by appointing a Democrat, unlike the law says, or stalling and challenging the law. Or, you know, he could always follow the law, but that's not expected.
IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,342 posts)...eom.
Callie1979
(1,529 posts)DFW
(60,909 posts)It seemed so easy.............
Callie1979
(1,529 posts)Its almost as if they KNEW the topic would come up in the next 4 yrs
DFW
(60,909 posts)A friend of mine is the state auditor of Iowa. A former D.A., he ran for a job that used to be used to cover up Republican corruption in his state. He won, and so the majority Republican legislature immediately reduced the scope of the job of the state auditor, so that he would not be able put too many of the dirty state officials in prison.
DFW
(60,909 posts)Get some obscure, under-the-radar Kentucky Democrat to switch his party registration to Republican, get named by Beshear to fill out the rest of McTurtle's term, and just vote with us (after all, if Fetterman can vote with them, and they raise no objection....).
Capt. America
(2,588 posts)Perform a wellness check on McTurtle before he shuffles off to hell.
Martin68
(28,391 posts)OGBuzz
(955 posts)dlk
(13,498 posts)Theres more to this than McConnell being ill.
allegorical oracle
(6,744 posts)signaled that he's doing well -- or had bitten the big one.
ShazzieB
(23,132 posts)...and hurried to get home before he gives up the ghost! 👻
FakeNoose
(43,235 posts)They know that Gov. Beshear will appoint a Democrat and they don't want to see that happen.
Poor Moscow Mitch, no fancy state funeral for him. Maybe they'll scatter his ashes over the Lincoln Reflecting Pool?

karynnj
(61,275 posts)mercuryblues
(16,579 posts)In Kentucky, the rule is that Governor has to replace him with a member of their own party.
Right now, there is a non-voting, Senator. Having him replaced would give them not only a voting Senator, but also a few months of name recognition. Increasing his chances of winning an election.
Callie1979
(1,529 posts)mercuryblues
(16,579 posts)It just isn't what was put forth here.
Callie1979
(1,529 posts)Almost like they knew this would happen while a Democrat was Gov.
hedda_foil
(17,067 posts)Callie1979
(1,529 posts)Gaytano70
(1,313 posts)Moscow Mitch will keep leaking formaldehyde and they'll keep pumping him full of drugs 😡
Johonny
(26,878 posts)Truly a scumbag human that will goto hell.
C Moon
(13,853 posts)Wow. Great phrase. And I hope it is glued down to his legacy.
calimary
(91,642 posts)But theyll never use it. Republicans dont seem to have much of a relationship with the truth. Unless they can modify it to suit their overriding agenda.
Just for the record, I dont trust Republicans anymore than I can pick up my house and throw it down the hill.
31j20b3
(189 posts)dave99
(786 posts)just like Republicans
twodogsbarking
(19,958 posts)The Roux Comes First
(2,457 posts)drray23
(8,872 posts)SunSeeker
(58,453 posts)Sounds like hes already brain dead.
ImNotGod
(1,349 posts)Blue Owl
(60,210 posts)Theres gotta be a way to force the hand on whether hes alive or not.
dlk
(13,498 posts)Strategic planning is afoot.
Akakoji
(644 posts)He ws found unconscious, possibly not breathing, due to a heart attack. It's incredibly rare someone his age with a previous history even survived. If he did. I want to se a picture with him talking.
AdamGG
(1,917 posts)That's about 2 months more than he allowed Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
The Wizard
(13,983 posts)they'd wheel him in for the vote and poke him in the ribs so as to effect a guttural sound that was translated by his staff to mean whatever suited their needs.
BH liberal
(204 posts)one of the chief gravediggers of American democracy. He cynically instituted the constant use of the filibuster after the GOP lost control of the Congress in 2006. He rolled the dice because, as one of his own GOP congressional caucus members noted, the Republican brand had become "dog food". And nobody stopped McConnell. The gridlock that we have seen since has only worsened to the point Congress barely gets anything done. Mitch infamously torpedoed normal procedure for supreme court picks, packed the judiciary with right wing idealogues...among his many other sins. He helped create the Trumpenstein Monster. Maybe, like the German politicians of the 1930's who thought they could control Hitler, McConnell thought the GOP could do the same with the Orange Menace. People who don't learn from history...
NoRethugFriends
(3,855 posts)The Republicans are minus one vote in the Senate now. If he was reported dead then there would be a special election and the Republicans would get that vote back. A Democrat is not going to be elected to the Senate there.