General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI ain't scared of being called a communist.
Because I'm not.
My policies are not.
I cannot even think of a pure communist country anymore.
I'm not scared of being called a communist.
just like the over-represented senior citizen membership on this site, but goodness fuck I refuse to live in fear.
Sure as fuck not afraid of weak people like MAGAts.
mr715
(5,010 posts)And I wear my politics with pride and power.
Let'em call me whatever, I know how I vote.
Melon
(1,987 posts)That has never worked. Its doomed to failure.
We should absolutely fight that label as just more republicans slander.
mr715
(5,010 posts)DemocracyForever
(386 posts)and call Trump/GOP what they are, anti-democracy Nazis.
Stacey Grove
(216 posts)What concrete steps would you propose the average rational person take to fight the litany of absurd nonsense they traffic in?
The Wizard
(13,983 posts)He was red baiting before McCarthy.
mr715
(5,010 posts)Karasu
(2,419 posts)Quite the contrary. It's the oldest, most tired line they have.
mr715
(5,010 posts)-misanthroptimist
(2,069 posts)"Oh, so you don't know what communism is? You poor thing."
Srkdqltr
(10,202 posts)rampartd
(5,716 posts)when they show up at your house at midnight it is not to have a dormitory debate on economic systems.
Srkdqltr
(10,202 posts)SocialDemocrat61
(8,455 posts)However, there are many on the left proudly calling themselves socialist and communist. They seem to hate democrats as much as MAGAts. However, I still don't get how someone who says that Lenin or Stalin is their personal hero has the moral standing to accuse Kamala Harris of genocide.
31j20b3
(189 posts)Those groups know little but Fox news and "street attitude" and nothing more
And the streets they live and work on a occupied by MAGA
Dems REALLY MUST work to shift the words that are associated with Democrats to something much more friendly to the desires of low education voters.
Saying for the 10th time in 3 days, Dems need the popular discriptors of Dems to be something like FAIR-DEALERS
mr715
(5,010 posts)They are calling us poopyheads because they got nothing else.
And the People will see through it.
31j20b3
(189 posts)And I think the following...
You want your brand to acceptable to the broadest market. Letting opponents and competitors brand you isn't likely to do that. Even if Dems do the 75 year old shoulder shrug to imply it doesn't matter.
In Marketing the marketers (herein Democrats) you need to control the rhetoric that brands you. So you can push on the thing you want to market.
Letting more generations of R's control the rhetoric around Dems brand flunks Marketing 101. It isn't wise, and it won't be as effective and friendly to Dems as it would if Dems were doing for themselves.
And you need to make it EASY for non-Dems (aka MAGA, Trad Rs, and Independents) to see what it is you are selling. Why not proudly say DEMS ARE THE FAIR DEALERS
-- no wars of whimsy
-- the cost of living is too damn high
-- billionaires should pay more because they have more
I don't appreciate the business model of political discourse. We don't need to have a consultant craft our message.
We have to have a message and deliver on it.
This "fair deal", "new deal", "progressive", whatever -- doesn't matter if you come out without demonstrating you are willing to take a bruising for what you believe.
What is valuable is only what it worth fighting for.
Call it whatever you want. I want a cage fighter Democratic party.
A tent that includes people critical of the free market, and billionaires like the Gov. of Illinois.
I don't want Marketing 101, I want Brazilian Jiu Jitsu
31j20b3
(189 posts)I can go back 75 years and I remember every one of the Dem presidents doing it. WWII, Korea, Suez Canal, Bay of PIgs, Vietnam, Raid to recover Hostages, Clinton Kosova and the Serbs, Obama Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen, Biden Syria Iraq and Yemen.
I don't think there is a point to be made on that.
You conditions Fair-deal, new deal, progressive Whater as WEAK. That isn't reality based. None of those things requires a Dem to move the US into taking a bruising.
Fight and fighting are popular words.
Those words seem like they should radiate strength, but they don't. They radiate belligerence. They mostly show an attitude toward people who are deemed opponents, and you can't get a vote from an opponent especia;lly if you are smacking them in the face.
When you are fighting the point is to subdue an opponent by force. It's not about being peacable, diplomatic or cooperative things Dems consider themselve to be
You might be able to try to subdue opponents from a position of power, but then Dems aren't in the position of power of the presidency and control of congress or the courts
We've got to WIN those things through WORK, that convinces US voters to give power to Dems. That work really isn't about cage-fights
Mossfern
(4,940 posts)Don't be naive.
We need to smack back and smack back hard with "memes' and slogans. Many of the US electorate are too lazy or distracted to look into the veracity of the claims coming from the right.
I feel that is a weakness of our party - we give people too much credit.
I'm not vilifying those who are just working too hard merely to survive to get involved in politics, who don't have the time or energy to look into specifics of each party and rely on the media to get their information - trusting only one or two media sources.
It's time to learn from the strategies of our opponents.
mr715
(5,010 posts)We tie ourselves into gordian knots of ideological nonsense to avoid being labeled.
My understanding is Bernie Sanders is the least disliked politician in the country. He is devoid of labels. A socialist Democrat? A Democratic socialist? An independent?
Labels don't matter when you deliver on policy people want. Then... people will start adopting those labels!
Mossfern
(4,940 posts)I'm being realistic.
"But her emails" - do you not think that that had an effect on voter turnout?
Slogans work.
That's why people use them.
You can't deliver policy if you're not in office.
31j20b3
(189 posts)Choosing and then selling their definitions of democrats to the public.
Not being scared and shoulder shrugging isn't a winner.
Ask any company A that spends heavily on advertising whether they think their competitors should be the ones controlling the marketing of Company A. It doesn't happen.
Create a GOOD product, try to make a product without bad side effects, Market its goodness. The Dems don't need to chase republican's disparaging rhetoric down rat holes.
.
Torchlight
(7,339 posts)and support none of them. Your narrative may be more convincing if you tried supporting them rather than repeating them with minor variances.
mr715
(5,010 posts)orangecrush
(32,038 posts)It has a nice chicken shit corporate ring to it

meadowlander
(5,206 posts)- Archbishop Hélder Câmara
If they're calling you a communist, it's because you're asking the right questions.
Prairie Gates
(8,742 posts)mr715
(5,010 posts)Prairie Gates
(8,742 posts)Karasu
(2,419 posts)They use those words interchangeably both because they think they sound scary and because they're all idiots who think they mean the same thing,
eShirl
(20,575 posts)Submariner
(13,493 posts)so communist Antifa pool vandals is just the next step to the Pedo's hoped for replay of Kent State-like shootings nationwide, because he wants Blue state blood on the streets.
Vinca
(54,621 posts)I think given the Maggie Haberman/Jonathan Swan book, we should discuss the Epstein matter a little bit more. Were you aware - I wasn't - there was an email in a civil suit that described Trump's nipple fetish? According to the book, a young lady was presented to Trump for his pleasure, and he proceeded to work over her nipples to the point they became red and swollen. Apparently, this tidbit slipped through in the first collection of documents to be released but was removed when it was found it was from a civil case.
mr715
(5,010 posts)Now I don't need to eat today
Vinca
(54,621 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(184,508 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(107,002 posts)I am so disappointed that the moment the biggest known liar and bullshitter in the US, the rapist occupying the Oval Office, starts throwing around the word "communist" as if he has the faintest understanding of its meaning, then Democrats start panicking as if this is a man whose arguments need responding to.
He is historically unpopular. He wanted people to inject bleach into themselves. He just started a war for no good reason, and lost it. He even talks, on Independence Day, to a former communist for 90 minutes, since Putin is apparently his best friend in the world. Everyone should just point out what a disaster he is, and what a disaster every single remaining Republican is for having supported him.
rampartd
(5,716 posts)they are going to kill us because trump called us communists.
posobiac's book "unhumans" describes who they think we are = lazy thieves who want to steal the productivity of our overlords.
Unhumans: The Secret History of Communist Revolutions (and How to Crush Them) is a 2024 American political and polemical book by Jack Posobiec and co-author Joshua Lisec which was a New York Times bestseller.[1] It features a foreword by Steve Bannon and a blurb from JD Vance. The book claims that the American left desires a communist dictatorship and thus should be labeled "unhumans" who should lack human rights.
highplainsdem
(63,890 posts)rampartd
(5,716 posts)highplainsdem
(63,890 posts)Bookreadingliberal53
(183 posts)mr715
(5,010 posts)DinahMoeHum
(23,786 posts). . .if you ain't been called a red. . .
ananda
(35,912 posts)you'd be scared.
This whole thing is so ridiculous.
mr715
(5,010 posts)mr715
(5,010 posts)Her departure was very disappointing for the children.
kentuck
(116,216 posts)Very few are going to desert him
We just have to get more people to the polls.
They are not going to change.
BeneteauBum
(1,012 posts)Six months ago, few people were ascribed the label communist. However, with the elections of several left of center politicians, suddenly this administration has decided to characterize them and anyone who supports them as communists. Knowing that the mid term elections are looking bleak, the Republican Party has jumped on this attempt of political gamesmanship.
I certainly dont fit the definition as I own my home, albeit a floating one, and enjoy living as I please on my pension. If the collective receives any of my money, its because I choose to donate/pay. The part of society that I feel Im forced to share with is the insurance companies.
Ive had the right call me a communist many times because I AM a left wing lunatic. I laugh because they dont understand what communism means and they just throw the slur out there because theyre afraid of what I represent. Yes, I am different from them and happier for it! Fuckem!
Peace ☮️
LeftInTX
(35,090 posts)He supports a totalitarian state.
Kaleva
(40,509 posts)EnergizedLib
(3,281 posts)And social reforms are not the same thing.
