For the Epsteinth Time - a Democratic Socialist is not a Communist!
— @kitkat444.bsky.social (@katydid53.bsky.social) 2026-07-05T21:51:48.580Z
= new reply since forum marked as read
Do you think Repukes even care about anyone but themselves? Who wouldn’t want to join the party that makes sure you have enough resources to feed your damned CAT? This guy is the poster child for socialism, and I think he’s making it look very appealing! 
The contemporary version of the conspiracy theory originated in the United States during the 1990s and takes inspiration from the Nazi propaganda term "Cultural Bolshevism". Originally found only on the far-right political fringe, the term began to enter mainstream discourse in the 2010s and is now found globally.
The conspiracy theory of a Marxist culture war is promoted by right-wing politicians, fundamentalist religious leaders, political commentators in mainstream print and television media, and white supremacist terrorists, and has been described as "a foundational element of the alt-right worldview".[9] Scholarly analysis of the conspiracy theory has concluded that it has no basis in fact. The use of the term 'Cultural Marxism' by conservative politicians as a byname for progressivism has been the cause of controversies.
Origins
European reactionaries, following their defeat in the culture wars of the 1960s against liberals and Marxists, split from the mainstream conservatism of the "Old Right", forming a loose intellectual grouping (the "New Right"
that criticised the contemporaneous society and attempted to transform cultural norms and values. In the 21st century, The European New Right influenced the US alt-right to focus on nonviolent ways to delegitimize the liberal status quo. This included criticising the perceived decline of Western culture and the influence of pop culture, which they claimed was the result of a collusion between capitalism and what they called "Cultural Marxism".
snip
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory
... ALL of our now former allies are democratic socialists for Christ's sake! Trump vomits forth triggers for his brain-dead "base" to get them frothing at the mouth over FUCKING NOTHING, just to make sure he's ALWAYS the center of attention! He is a malicious CHILD!
Not long ago, I had a troll here call me out for saying that socialism, in its purest form , was nothing more than putting the best interests of people ahead of the best interests of corporations, which is never a bad thing, except to corporatists, who are sociopaths who would gut their grannies for a buck, or just for a joke. Remember those Texas-based Enron shitstains that laughed about old ladies freezing to death because they were manipulating brownouts in other states?
And people wonder why I won't let a Republican in my house. Do you know what it costs to fumigate the place afterwards? 
... reversing the order of the two words sounds like simple semantics. I have nothing but admiration for the Nordic nations' form of governance.
The USSR gave socialism a bad name, and an even worse definition, and no one seems to agree on a basic definition boiled down to its essence, which, it seems to me, should be to put the best interests of people ahead of the best interests of corporations and oligarchs. I also don't like to conflate capitalism with free enterprise; they are most definitely not the same thing. Capitalism is the control and manipulation of money, or "CAPITAL". Capitalists often work to suppress free enterprise in their efforts to eliminate, or at least minimize, competition. And capital is the lifeblood of any enterprise, free or otherwise.
It was never my intention to demean Sweden, or any other country, by misinterpreting their forms of government. Perhaps we should work on a solid explanation of the difference between Democratic Socialism and Social Democracy. I hate being misunderstood, so I try very hard to get the definitions of terms tossed about in today's political debates correct, and we both know how flagrantly conservatives deliberately twist and pervert the meanings of words like woke, or acronyms like DEI, or Antifa. So I would benefit from your assistance in understanding more clearly how best to refer to Sweden's form and methods of governance.
Have a nice day, Celerity! 
The one-per-centers have convinced the MAGA-cult to burn this country down, just to avoid being "restrained" by the US Constitution. Rules are written for everyone else, not for the high-and-mighty. That's how crazy they are, they're ready to bet it all.
Socialists and communists have been feared and maligned for over a hundred years. The Red Scare after WWII never really went away. RW politicians and media have kept it fresh in people's consciousness. Then Hugo Chavez and Nicolás Maduro were very oppressive, making it easy to continue scaring folks with the boogeyman. Not just their Republicans and the RW audience either.
The truth is, the word will never ever get beyond its scary and evil associations. Trying to keep using socialist in any way, shape, or form is a losing proposition. It's a waste of time too.
There are terms that don't have the negative coding, terms that have been used throughout American history, that predate Marxism, socialism, and communism. The common good is a concept from colonial America. It was successfully used in arguments against laissez faire capitalism, when the abuses became apparent. But it isn't incompatible with small business.
Public interest, commonwealth, general well-being are all similar in meaning and history with common good and I rather think would be compatible with what democratic socialists and other dems believe..
I cannot think of any Dems who would oppose the idea of the common good or any of the other terms, nor independents, or quite a few conservatives too. Christians cross the spectrum would tend to find it compatible with the teachings of Jesus, unless they have been infected with the lust for power in which case it likely would be considered woke and weak.
Why, oh why, do democratic socialists persist in clinging to a name that is always effective in damaging us, our party, and our cause? Linking socialist with democrat is poisonous for our reputation. It does nothing to improve the image of socialists for most Americans but does a whole lot to harm the image of democrats.
Cognitive structures build up in brains from repetition, and the repulsion toward anything to do with socialist is already widespread. It has passed from one generation to the next for more than a hundred years. All conservatives have to do is tap into it. It's a tool they already have in their toolbox, and it works.
