Microsoft Drops Law Firm That Made a Deal With Trump From a Case
Source: NY Times
When big law firms attacked by President Trump decided to make a deal with him rather than fight, many did so because their leaders feared that clients would abandon a firm caught on the administrations bad side. Now that logic may be getting less compelling. A major company, Microsoft, has dropped a law firm that settled with the administration in favor of one that is fighting it.
Large companies like Microsoft often farm out legal work to dozens or even hundreds of firms and may move business depending on circumstances, like pricing, expertise or potential conflicts. Microsoft declined to comment on why it changed law firms in a significant case last week, but the switch suggests that a firm that chose to fight the Trump administration could still attract an important client.
On April 22, several attorneys at the law firm Simpson Thacher & Bartlett informed the Delaware Court of Chancery that they would no longer be representing Microsoft in a case related to the companys 2023 acquisition of the video game giant Activision Blizzard, according to court filings.
On the same day that the Simpson Thacher lawyers filed paperwork withdrawing from the Microsoft case, at least three partners at the firm Jenner & Block informed the court that they would be representing Microsoft in the case. Jenner is fighting in court to permanently block a Trump administration executive order targeting its business.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/01/business/microsoft-drops-trump-compliant-law-firm.html

50 Shades Of Blue
(11,125 posts)Irish_Dem
(69,059 posts)LiberalArkie
(18,044 posts)$1M will protect you from us hurting you. But it does nothing if the mob decides to burn down the whole block so it can build a condo's.
We won't go after Microsoft, Apple, Meta etc directly, but we never said we would not enact tariffs that might put you out of business.
ThoughtCriminal
(14,547 posts)These weak firms did not do themselves a favor.
Biophilic
(5,564 posts)Why would Microsoft want a law firm that caved to trump when they were fighting a lawsuit from the trump administration against them? The law firm had caved to trump once why trust them not to cave again?
littlemissmartypants
(27,397 posts)You did a much better job, summing it up, than the reporter did.
❤️
ananda
(31,594 posts)The title alone is very poorly phrased.
Cha
(310,145 posts)progressoid
(51,343 posts)Good times. Good times.
Fullduplexxx
(8,453 posts)CitizenZero
(920 posts)I was never a fan of Microsoft- both their products and their business practices. That said, Bill Gates turned out to be a decent humanitarian and philanthropist who used his vast wealth responsibly. If these other billionaire tech bros were more like Gates than Musk, we might not be in the bad political situation that we are stuck with right now. Power should go to righteous and compassionate people, not to the morally defective.
LetMyPeopleVote
(162,387 posts)Law firms that struck deals with the White House thought itd protect their bottom line. What if their assumptions were wrong?
https://bsky.app/profile/stevebenen.com/post/3lo526msjqk2b
Larger arc: It's not too late for the firms that chose presidential appeasement to change course.
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/microsoft-drops-law-firm-appeased-trump-hires-firm-s-fighting-trump-rcna204152
As for the firms that went along with the White Houses demands, the news is far less good. Not only are the firms starting to realize that their deals with the president are worse than they first realized, at least one of the firms is also learning that the plan to keep prominent clients happy might be backfiring. The New York Times reported that Microsoft has dropped a law firm that settled with the administration in favor of one that is fighting it.
Large companies like Microsoft often farm out legal work to dozens or even hundreds of firms and may move business depending on circumstances, like pricing, expertise or potential conflicts. Microsoft declined to comment on why it changed law firms in a significant case last week, but the switch suggests that a firm that chose to fight the Trump administration could still attract an important client.
While the reporting has not been independently verified by MSNBC or NBC News, the switch has been confirmed in official court filings. About a week ago, attorneys at one firm Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, which recently reached an agreement with Trump and his team informed a court in Delaware that it would no longer be representing Microsoft in an acquisitions case......
In the meantime, firms are also contending with a new pressure campaign. NBC News reported last week that a progressive group has launched a media campaign targeting the same firms that have already reached deals with the president.
Big law, stop bending the knee, reads a poster from the Big Law Cowards campaign by the liberal nonprofit group Demand Justice. The group says the ads will be wheatpasted strategically around Washington on Thursday near the locations of the firms that have reached deals with the administration. The group will also have a mobile billboard circulating with ads criticizing the firms, along with a broader digital campaign.
In case this isnt obvious, the underlying point of these efforts isnt to chastise the firms for making the wrong decision; its to remind the firms that its not too late to reverse course and join the ranks of the firms resisting Trumps gambit.