Republicans Consider Shifting Cost Of Food Benefits To States, With Cuts Likely
Source: Huff Post
May 2, 2025, 07:00 AM EDT
WASHINGTON Republicans might ask states to share the cost of food benefits to help pay for tax cuts at the heart of President Donald Trumps second-term agenda, a move that would likely shrink the program and leave some households with less money for food.
Potential cuts to Medicaid have received the most attention in recent weeks, but Republican lawmakers are also considering a significant change to the basic structure of the program that helps more than 20 million households buy food each month.
The federal government fully pays for the $100 billion annual cost of benefits under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, with states certifying eligibility and covering about half of the administrative costs. Under the proposal Republicans are considering, in coming years, states would have to pick up a share of the cost of benefits potentially 10% to 15% at first or else shrink enrollment to avoid having to pick up the tab.
House Agriculture Committee chair Glenn Thompson (R-Pa.), whose panel oversees SNAP, insisted there would be no cuts to benefits but told HuffPost the idea of shunting costs to states is under serious discussion. He acknowledged it could create problems for states.
Thats pretty difficult to do because most states have balanced budget amendments, Thompson said. For years, Thompson has resisted efforts by members of his party to tighten SNAP eligibility or cut benefits, but other Republicans are eagerly seeking ways to offset some of the $5 trillion in tax cuts theyre hoping to approve this year as part of what Trump calls a big, beautiful bill.
Read more: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/snap-cuts-budget-reconciliation-beautiful_n_6813a6ffe4b0964363620874

CousinIT
(11,288 posts)...once at the fed level - EVEN THOUGH WE DON'T GET SERVICES OR THE SAME LEVEL OF SERVICES FROM THE FED LEVEL ANYMORE ...
and we will pay AGAIN in the form of higher STATE and LOCAL taxes when they have to make up the difference. We pay TWICE.
Our fed taxes now will mostly go to tax cuts for billionaires instead of gov't services. Then we pay MORE (again) at the state level to maintain the services the federal gov't used to provide.
It's just MORE ROBBERY from the billionaires, who now run our gov't.
Of course they want to 'shrink' government. If the government only has to represent and serve the goddamned billionaires, it doesn't need to be very big since they are such a tiny minority. BUT - if we want a government that serves EVERYONE, then it needs to be BIG - because our country is BIG.
underpants
(190,237 posts)Several are.
MissouriDem47
(152 posts)Trump is working toward the country returning to the good times of 1932. We know what was happening then don't we?
Bayard
(24,846 posts)What does trump's new dept. of christian religion say about that?
Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Skittles This message was self-deleted by its author.