'Set up for failure': Trump's cuts bring climate and energy agencies to a standstill, workers say
Source: Politico
06/17/2025 05:00 AM EDT
Cuts and freezes are jamming up some of the basic functions of government at agencies targeted in President Donald Trumps rollbacks of his predecessors energy and environmental policies, more than a dozen federal employees told POLITICO.
Lockdowns of spending and an absence of guidance from political appointees are leaving Environmental Protection Agency scientists unable to publish their research, preventing some Energy Department officials from visiting their departments laboratories and forcing the cancellation of disaster planning exercises at the Federal Emergency Management Agency, said the 13 employees, who were granted anonymity to avoid reprisals. They said the chaos has also left recipients of Biden-era energy grants in limbo as they wait for approval to continue the projects theyve started. We are set up for failure, one FEMA official said.
Other affected agencies include the Interior Department and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which conducts crucial climate research and oversees the National Weather Service.
Rather than save taxpayers money, as Trumps Department of Government Efficiency has promised, federal workers at those five agencies said taxpayers are getting far less return from the government because work has been significantly curbed.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/17/trumps-energy-cuts-means-agencies-failure-00406526

groundloop
(13,050 posts)I've noticed that our weather forecasts aren't nearly as good as they were a year ago, thanks to cuts in atmospheric data gathering.
Of course it's pretty obvious that the end game here is to privatize the National Weather Service. GQPers will proclaim "the weather service is doing a horrible job so we "need" to contract it out". Before too long we won't be able to get tornado warnings unless we pay for a weather subscription.
progree
(12,005 posts)From the OP:
The Krasnov admin is certainly setting things up so that government contributes nothing to anything that is useful or helpful.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lunatik is one of the ones suggesting that the GDP not include government spending.
By the way, PCE inflation (the Fed's favorite measure, sometimes called "Pissy Inflation"

BumRushDaShow
(154,579 posts)