Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(162,477 posts)
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 05:05 AM Wednesday

Epstein Victim Virginia Giuffre Was 'Forced to Sexually Service' Prince Andrew, Author Tells Piers Morgan

Source: MEDIAite

Oct 28th, 2025, 5:40 pm


Late Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre was “forced to sexually service” Prince Andrew, according to author Amy Wallace, who helped Giuffre write her recently-published memoir, Nobody’s Girl.

Wallace did not mince words during an interview on Piers Morgan’s Uncensored show on Tuesday. Morgan asked Wallace if she had “any doubt” that Giuffre had sex with the prince, and Wallace, while shaking her head, said she did not.

“No, absolutely no doubt. Repeatedly,” Wallace replied. “And she didn’t just have sex with him — she was forced to sexually service him. That’s maybe a distinction without a difference to some, but there’s a difference to me.”

Her comment comes just a few weeks after Buckingham Palace announced 76-year-old Andrew would give up his remaining royal titles. That decision was made after an email emerged showing Andrew lied about cutting off contact with the convicted sex criminal in late 2010.

Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/media/epstein-victim-virginia-giuffre-was-forced-to-sexually-service-prince-andrew-author-tells-piers-morgan/

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Epstein Victim Virginia Giuffre Was 'Forced to Sexually Service' Prince Andrew, Author Tells Piers Morgan (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Wednesday OP
Pedophile Andrew should be in jail. SunSeeker Wednesday #1
Yes. Instead of debating whether he should lose his titles or not, he should be in prison. Irish_Dem Wednesday #2
Even if she came up to Andrew and pulled his pants down lapfog_1 Wednesday #3
Even if she was an adult, forcing women to have sex for profit is a crime. Irish_Dem Wednesday #4
Imagine having the sole power to decide the fate of your brother... especially given he was the late Queen's favorite... hlthe2b Wednesday #5
The British should just dispense with the Monarchy all together. It's an embarrassing anachronism. NNadir Wednesday #8
Having royals is actually a net economic positive JT45242 Wednesday #10
So, tourists will stop visiting England if the monarchy is abolished? Must be the reason no one goes to France anymore! Floyd R. Turbo Wednesday #13
Ding ding, ding. Americans are pretty naive' to the lingering, if substantial benefits of having the monarchy. hlthe2b Wednesday #19
America and its squandered moral high ground -- thx for pointing that out Hekate Wednesday #24
I was in France for the first time last fall. colorado_ufo Wednesday #23
Vive la France!🇫🇷 Floyd R. Turbo Wednesday #25
The BBC reports estimates the Monarchy costs Britain 510 million pounds per year. NNadir Wednesday #16
In many American places IbogaProject Wednesday #17
There is undoubtedly far more in the Epstein files, including that involved with an orange pedophile in the... NNadir Wednesday #6
In an indirect way, ex-wife of Prince Andrew, a/k/a Fergie was complicit by no_hypocrisy Wednesday #7
Second curious suicide in the biggest case in history -- anyone expecting a 3rd, 4th or 5th? Ponietz Wednesday #9
Indeed. MrsCheaplaugh Wednesday #20
They need to check the area around Epstein Island think4yourself Wednesday #26
I really hate these entitled MFers that think they AllyCat Wednesday #11
How many ways can you define rape? Marthe48 Wednesday #12
Andrew is not 76 years old. hamsterjill Wednesday #14
I noticed that too. yardwork Wednesday #15
Being forced to sexual serve someone is another term for rape. Clouds Passing Wednesday #18
She didn't "have sex" with him. evolves Wednesday #21
Another thing bothering me is, NOTHING will happen to this RAPIST! So bluestarone Wednesday #22

Irish_Dem

(77,027 posts)
2. Yes. Instead of debating whether he should lose his titles or not, he should be in prison.
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 05:34 AM
Wednesday

lapfog_1

(31,366 posts)
3. Even if she came up to Andrew and pulled his pants down
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 05:43 AM
Wednesday

If she was under 18 at the time, it is/was a crime. Rape.

Not sure what the limitations are for child rape in the US Virgin Islands... but before 2020 it would likely have been 4 years in Florida.

If there was credible evidence that she presented herself as being over 18 then you would need to prove the claim on "forced into it". Evidence such as a fake ID... that might have gotten "randy andy" out of legal trouble at the time. Right now I don't think he faces any legal issues since so much time has passed.

That said, King Charles should completely strip him of all titles and monies from the monarchy, not just some and not just because he lied about the last time he corresponded with Epstein.



hlthe2b

(111,938 posts)
5. Imagine having the sole power to decide the fate of your brother... especially given he was the late Queen's favorite...
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 06:42 AM
Wednesday

I don't disagree with the need to strip him of all titles and financial benefits of a royal. I just empathize with Charles having to do so. William will be ruthless on this, no doubt. But for King Charles, I'm sure it causes him considerable inner conflict.

RIP, Virginia. You deserve to.

NNadir

(36,829 posts)
8. The British should just dispense with the Monarchy all together. It's an embarrassing anachronism.
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 07:19 AM
Wednesday

Why should British taxpayers support these entitled brats at all? What value to any of them have in a stressed world, a dying planet?

JT45242

(3,706 posts)
10. Having royals is actually a net economic positive
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 07:47 AM
Wednesday

I used to think the same thing. But saw the tourism numbers and what the legitimate rental fees that the royal family could charge for the land they own.

They should shut the fuck up and try to live quiet lives doing charity work, but the economy of the UK is actually better with royals.

Floyd R. Turbo

(31,658 posts)
13. So, tourists will stop visiting England if the monarchy is abolished? Must be the reason no one goes to France anymore!
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 08:22 AM
Wednesday

hlthe2b

(111,938 posts)
19. Ding ding, ding. Americans are pretty naive' to the lingering, if substantial benefits of having the monarchy.
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 10:30 AM
Wednesday

They have already been diminished to minimally more than ceremonial status, while a continuing boon to historical tourism and charity pursuits. So, while I get the reaction of the countries and island nations who suffered at the hands of England's monarchy and imperialism over the past centuries--and the racist policies through more recent times, as far as I'm concerned, America's right to criticize ended in 1783 with the winning end of the Revolutionary War. And if not then, with the inauguration (2x) of Donald Trump---the worst "thing" the US has unleashed on the world in its history. SO, imo, we in the US should just shut the f..k up about England and the UK's politics and government. We have more than LOST that moral high ground.

colorado_ufo

(6,171 posts)
23. I was in France for the first time last fall.
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 01:20 PM
Wednesday

The people were warm, polite and welcoming, and the food far exceeded my expectations - and I am originally from New Orleans!

NNadir

(36,829 posts)
16. The BBC reports estimates the Monarchy costs Britain 510 million pounds per year.
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 09:00 AM
Wednesday
Royals really cost £510m, anti-monarchists say

It is difficult to ascertain how many tourists go to Britain hoping to see something about King Charles, but I would imagine that it would not likely that not having him would have a minor impact unless he dies.

I've been to the UK 3 or 4 times, I can't actually recall the number of times, as it was business travel. I did some tourism, the British Museum, where I was disinterested in anything about royalty.

I did see the piles of flowers in front of Kensington Palace connected with Diana's death, but only because my hotel was around the block. It's not like I was wandering around hoping to see some sign of the Queen and her not to bright Children.

Speaking for myself, I found the whole thing a little obscene.

I march for No Kings in the United States; I am not dissuaded that the British should do the same.

"Prince" Andrew's behavior gibes with what I've seen over my lifetime in connection with people raised into an elitist wealthy and sybaritic lifestyle.

Tourists can, if interested, look at artifacts of the Royal era, but in these times, again, in my opinion, it's obscene.

IbogaProject

(5,292 posts)
17. In many American places
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 09:11 AM
Wednesday

The offense is reguardless of any "id" it's absolute liability.

NNadir

(36,829 posts)
6. There is undoubtedly far more in the Epstein files, including that involved with an orange pedophile in the...
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 07:09 AM
Wednesday

...White House, or what's left of the White House.

no_hypocrisy

(53,608 posts)
7. In an indirect way, ex-wife of Prince Andrew, a/k/a Fergie was complicit by
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 07:14 AM
Wednesday

being his beard for so long.

Repeatedly and publicly announcing that he was "true and real gentleman," a "great man with a great heart," and a "kind, good man". She has defended him during scandals, stated she would "do it all over again" in reference to their marriage, and highlighted their strong support for each other through personal and public struggles. Despite their divorce, she has maintained that their relationship has been defined by love, compassion, and a strong commitment to co-parenting their daughters.

Maybe she knew about Andrew's antics via Epstein; maybe she didn't.

But the fact that she asked for and accepted a ton of money for Epstein to maintain her luxurious lifestyle kind of makes it look quid pro quo. And her assistance allowed girls like Virginia to be used as a sexual toy for her ex-husband.

Ponietz

(4,119 posts)
9. Second curious suicide in the biggest case in history -- anyone expecting a 3rd, 4th or 5th?
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 07:31 AM
Wednesday

Deep state coverup.

think4yourself

(866 posts)
26. They need to check the area around Epstein Island
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 02:23 PM
Wednesday

I shudder to think what they would find on the ocean floor.

AllyCat

(18,303 posts)
11. I really hate these entitled MFers that think they
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 07:56 AM
Wednesday

Get to do whatever they want because of who they are. Unethical, deviant, criminal, violent behavior that they think they have a right to.

May he and the rest of them burn in hell if there is one.

Marthe48

(22,176 posts)
12. How many ways can you define rape?
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 08:11 AM
Wednesday

If the poor soul were underage, and forced. What else? Jus primae noctis?

hamsterjill

(16,683 posts)
14. Andrew is not 76 years old.
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 08:43 AM
Wednesday

Sorry. Inconsequential to the article, but I hate bad journalism. I believe he’s 65.

Clouds Passing

(6,337 posts)
18. Being forced to sexual serve someone is another term for rape.
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 10:28 AM
Wednesday

OMG! I’m so over the word salad language regarding sexual assault.

evolves

(5,664 posts)
21. She didn't "have sex" with him.
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 10:48 AM
Wednesday

She was RAPED by him.

Words matter. This needs to be called what it is. It is rape. He is a child rapist.

bluestarone

(20,625 posts)
22. Another thing bothering me is, NOTHING will happen to this RAPIST! So
Wed Oct 29, 2025, 11:01 AM
Wednesday

Even if it's proven that TSF DID the same thing (along with multi Billionaires) NOTHING will happen to him as well.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Epstein Victim Virginia G...