Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(172,666 posts)
Wed May 27, 2026, 07:18 PM 12 hrs ago

Exclusive: Justice Department launches a criminal investigation into Trump accuser E. Jean Carroll

Source: CNN Politics

PUBLISHED May 27, 2026, 7:05 PM ET


The Justice Department has launched a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll, the former magazine columnist who accused President Donald Trump of sexual assault, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.

The investigation is focused on whether Carroll committed perjury in testimony tied to her two civil lawsuits against the president – one alleging he sexually abused Carroll in a New York department store in the mid-1990s, and a second for defaming her when in 2019 he repeatedly denied the assault, said she wasn’t his type and claimed she made it up to boost sales of a book.

Prosecutors’ theory hinges on a 2022 deposition statement by Carroll, 82, that she received no outside funding for her lawsuit, though it was later revealed that billionaire Reid Hoffman had paid some legal fees and expenses.

Carroll’s team declined to comment for this story. Attempts to reach Hoffman on Wednesday were unsuccessful.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/27/politics/exclusive-justice-department-launched-e-jean-carroll-investigation

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Jacson6

(2,226 posts)
3. All she has to do is not speak to them without a lawyer present.
Wed May 27, 2026, 07:42 PM
11 hrs ago

If she is called before a grand jury she just needs to invoke her fifth amendment right. The founder fathers saw that the gov't can abuse it's power.

onenote

(46,247 posts)
7. Some background about grand jury investigations and perjury charges
Wed May 27, 2026, 11:46 PM
7 hrs ago

First, the target of a Grand Jury investigation is not always called to testify before the grand jury. If they are, they can invoke their fifth amendment rights but grand jury witnesses are not allowed to have a lawyer present in the grand jury room when they testify. If the government opts to proceed without calling the target to testify -- which is what I would expect to be the case with respect to Carroll, she could demand to testify but only if she gives up her right to invoke the fifth amendment.

From what I've read, the focus of the perjury allegation relates to an October 2022 deposition in which Carroll testified that to the best of her knowledge, her legal fees were not being paid by a third person. It was subsequently disclosed that a non-profit established by Reid Hoffman was providing funding that was being used to pay for some of Carroll's litigation costs, however the details regarding the funding and whether and/or when Carroll became aware of the funding is unclear or in dispute.

In any event, it is a very slim reed on which to hang a perjury charge, particularly since the trial court held a hearing about the funding issue and Carroll was not charged with perjury at that time. Keep in mind that to convict someone of perjury, the prosecution would have to establish that Carroll made a false statement, that it was made with knowledge of its falsity and not as a result of mistake or faulty memory. Thus, even if her answer in the deposition contained "false" information, if she believed her statement to be true when it was made, no perjury conviction can be obtained. Finally, the false statement has to be "material" to the proceeding -- meaning that statement in question has "a natural tendency to influence, or is capable of influencing, the decision of the decision-making body to which it was addressed." This would be extremely hard to establish given that the trial court held a hearing on whether the fact that some of Carroll's litigation costs were being covered by a third party was relevant and concluded, apparently, that it was not.

In short, this is a completely bullshit "investigation"

riversedge

(81,655 posts)
5. I am wondering why the DOJ is involved. I had always thought this was a personal lawsuit.
Wed May 27, 2026, 08:08 PM
11 hrs ago

onenote

(46,247 posts)
8. Her cases were brought and tried in federal court.
Wed May 27, 2026, 11:47 PM
7 hrs ago

So perjury during the proceedings, including pre-trial proceedings such as a deposition, falls within federal jurisdiction.

Bayard

(30,389 posts)
9. We knew this was coming at some point
Thu May 28, 2026, 12:16 AM
7 hrs ago

Ms. Carroll is probably in the Top 5 on trump's Enemies List.

muriel_volestrangler

(106,645 posts)
10. Yet another example that "lawfare and weaponization" is something Trump does, not something done to him (nt)
Thu May 28, 2026, 04:30 AM
2 hrs ago

littlemissmartypants

(34,582 posts)
11. Waste, fraud and abuse. The true slogan of the regime. Only the word abuse...
Thu May 28, 2026, 04:44 AM
2 hrs ago

Should be a verb
Unlike the other two nouns.

Because the leader is a waste of oxygen, a fraud as a person, and knows only how to abuse everything and everyone in his path.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Exclusive: Justice Depart...