Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(173,134 posts)
Sun Jun 14, 2026, 06:28 PM Sunday

'We're Afraid': Top Trump Aides Reportedly Think Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan Have Tapes of 'Sensitive Conversation

Source: MEDIAite

Jun 14th, 2026, 9:49 am


An explosive new report Sunday said top White House officials think New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan have gotten tapes of audio from inside the Situation Room — in what would be a truly stunning security breach.

The shocking report — from Axios’s Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen — states that top aides to President Donald Trump believe Haberman and Swan got their hands on Situation Room audio for their forthcoming book, Regime Change, out June 23. “We’re afraid some of our most sensitive conversations were being recorded,” an unnamed administration source told Vandehei and Allen. “And we have no idea which ones.”

On Wednesday, the Times published a splashy excerpt from the book centered on the White House’s handling of the DOJ files on Jeffrey Epstein. That piece included heavily quoted accounts from numerous Situation Room meetings in which high-level officials made candid statements. In one of the reported conversations, White House counsel David Warrington floated the idea of a presidential pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell — a suggestion which drew strenuous objections from several others in the room.

Haberman and Swan obtaining Situation Room audio would undoubtedly draw renewed scrutiny on the administration’s ability to keep sensitive conversations private.

Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/were-afraid-top-trump-aides-reportedly-think-maggie-haberman-and-jonathan-swan-have-tapes-of-sensitive-conversations-inside-the-situation-room/

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'We're Afraid': Top Trump Aides Reportedly Think Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan Have Tapes of 'Sensitive Conversation (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Sunday OP
Maggie Haberman is the asshole's go-to-reporter of the tepid NYT. AZLD4Candidate Sunday #1
Be afraid... be very afraid. FalloutShelter Sunday #2
LOL. Okay. PSPS Sunday #19
trump aides descend into panic over reporters' 'shocking breach' of Situation Room: report LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #3
Uh oh.... SergeStorms Sunday #17
OMG. A physical/verbal record of actual high level discussions?? Run!! Evolve Dammit Sunday #4
Isn't it SOP to do a sweep before these "top secret" meetings, and make sure there are no recording devices? FakeNoose Sunday #5
This WAS NOT a top secret meeting... reACTIONary Sunday #15
Exactly. This same kind of locker room talk comes out every night on Trump's Truth account Bluetus Yesterday #20
Exactly. These were Sit Room meetings Deminpenn Yesterday #22
That is what the room is to be used for but not this time and 2 people phoned in for the meeting Bev54 Sunday #16
Gosh, how in the world could that have happened? tanyev Sunday #6
Scoop: Trump aides fear Haberman and Swan obtained Situation Room tapes for "Regime Change" LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #7
So, who had the most to gain from such a leak? sheshe2 Sunday #8
The only mystery for me ... Tasmanian Devil Sunday #9
Staged leak LuvLoogie Sunday #10
I smell bullshit JoseBalow Sunday #11
This message was self-deleted by its author Ponietz Sunday #12
Performative live love laugh Sunday #13
will wait for it being in library. if they still exist. dave99 Sunday #14
Rep. Jeffries, crank up the old subpoena machine! LudwigPastorius Sunday #18
He can't until we retake the House. BumRushDaShow Yesterday #23
The great thing I see here Laha Yesterday #21
Not to worry. Next week, the Magster will get a one-on-one interview with Anal Fistula and the tapes will 3Hotdogs Yesterday #24

LetMyPeopleVote

(183,488 posts)
3. trump aides descend into panic over reporters' 'shocking breach' of Situation Room: report
Sun Jun 14, 2026, 06:37 PM
Sunday

The report by Haberman and Swan is so detailed that it may be that they have copies of the recordings of these meetings

Trump aides descend into panic over reporters' 'shocking breach' of Situation Room: report #RawStory

#TuckFrump (@realtuckfrumper.bsky.social) 2026-06-14T13:36:05.000Z

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-situation-room-haberman-axios/

Top Trump administration officials are gripped by fear that two reporters got their hands on audio recordings of meetings inside the White House Situation Room — one of the most secure rooms on the planet — for a forthcoming book, according to Axios.

The outlet reported White House officials believe New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan obtained tapes of Situation Room discussions for their book "Regime Change," due out June 23. Independent recording devices are forbidden in the room, which Axios noted would make such a leak "a shocking breach" of one of the world's most protected settings.

The dread inside the West Wing is as much about the unknown as the known. "We're afraid some of our most sensitive conversations were being recorded," one administration source told Axios. "And we have no idea which ones."

The alarm was triggered by book excerpts the Times posted ahead of publication, which included verbatim accounts of several Situation Room meetings on the Iran war and the Epstein files. Axios reported that the authors conducted more than 1,000 interviews for the book, a chronicle of Trump's second term.

Tellingly, Axios noted, White House officials have not disputed the accuracy of the quoted dialogue — including a blunt moment in which Secretary of State Marco Rubio waved off Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's regime-change scenarios for Iran. "In other words, it's bull----," Rubio said, according to the account.

Trump himself is "furious" about the blow-by-blow reconstructions of the top-secret talks, per Axios.

FakeNoose

(42,835 posts)
5. Isn't it SOP to do a sweep before these "top secret" meetings, and make sure there are no recording devices?
Sun Jun 14, 2026, 06:45 PM
Sunday

If Chump's staff aren't checking to make sure, they've got nothing to say now. It's their own fault that top secret recordings got out the door. And we all know that Maggie Haberman isn't that smart, nor devious.

reACTIONary

(7,377 posts)
15. This WAS NOT a top secret meeting...
Sun Jun 14, 2026, 09:14 PM
Sunday

. . Regardless of where it was held what was discussed was not secret, let alone top secret.

Bluetus

(3,238 posts)
20. Exactly. This same kind of locker room talk comes out every night on Trump's Truth account
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 12:50 AM
Yesterday

And who says it had to be an electronic recording? I mean, if Rubio said that Netanyahu and the regime change story were bullshit, a) I could easily remember that, and b) it isn't any secret. Everybody outside that room already knew that.

The only "secret" here is that this just shows what two-faced liars they are, but even that was not any revelation.

I suppose the only real story here is that if there realy are recordings, then perhaps some of that could be used in prosecutions in a few years. It is is just comments reconstructed from memory, thatn's not veyr good evidence in a prosecution.

Deminpenn

(17,617 posts)
22. Exactly. These were Sit Room meetings
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 01:43 AM
Yesterday

to plan a cover up of whatever's in the Epstein files. There were no national security discussions.

Bev54

(13,552 posts)
16. That is what the room is to be used for but not this time and 2 people phoned in for the meeting
Sun Jun 14, 2026, 09:20 PM
Sunday

being Patel and Bondi. Most people think it was one of them that recorded the meeting but then this is the Trump administration and none of them adhere to rules or norms so perhaps nobody turned in their phones prior to the meeting.

LetMyPeopleVote

(183,488 posts)
7. Scoop: Trump aides fear Haberman and Swan obtained Situation Room tapes for "Regime Change"
Sun Jun 14, 2026, 06:47 PM
Sunday

SCOOP: Top White House officials believe NYT reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan obtained audio recordings of Situation Room meetings for their new book.

Such a taped leak would be a shocking breach of one of the most secure settings on Earth.

Scoop: Trump aides fear Haberman and Swan obtained Situation Room tapes for "Regime Change" #Axios

#TuckFrump (@realtuckfrumper.bsky.social) 2026-06-14T13:12:08.000Z

https://www.axios.com/2026/06/14/trump-situation-room-tapes-haberman-swan-regime-change

Top White House officials believe New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan obtained audio recordings of Situation Room meetings for their forthcoming book, "Regime Change."

Why it matters: Such a taped leak would be a shocking breach of one of the most secure settings on Earth. Independent recording devices in the Situation Room are forbidden.

"We're afraid some of our most sensitive conversations were being recorded," an administration source told us. "And we have no idea which ones."

Verbatim accounts of several Situation Room meetings were included in excerpts about the Iran war and the Epstein files that The Times posted ahead of the book's June 23 publication. The authors conducted more than 1,000 interviews for "Regime Change," which covers Trump's second term.

Tellingly, White House officials haven't disputed verbatim dialogue from the top-secret Sit Room talks, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying about Bibi's regime-change scenarios for Iran: "In other words, it's bullshit."

We hear President Trump is furious about the blow-by-blow accounts.

Tasmanian Devil

(259 posts)
9. The only mystery for me ...
Sun Jun 14, 2026, 07:28 PM
Sunday

I just wonder if their copies had Russian, Chinese or North Korean notes attached to the recordings.

Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Laha

(437 posts)
21. The great thing I see here
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 01:19 AM
Yesterday

Is that now, whether or not any recordings actually exist is almost irrelevant. By their own concern about their potential existence they have essentially confirmed how accurate the reporting is anyway.

Paraphrased:

"How did you know I did that?"

"I didn't, you just confirmed it."

3Hotdogs

(15,690 posts)
24. Not to worry. Next week, the Magster will get a one-on-one interview with Anal Fistula and the tapes will
Mon Jun 15, 2026, 08:40 AM
Yesterday

never see the light of day. The interview will promote all the wonderful things our president has done for the country since January, 05.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'We're Afraid': Top Trump...