'Ruling in '8647' civil protest case signals strength of James Comey's criminal defense'
(MS NOW - Deadline Legal Blog) "The Trump Justice Department has alleged that when James Comey posted an image of seashells arranged as '86 47' last year, a reasonable observer familiar with the circumstances would have interpreted the former FBI directors social media post as a serious expression of intent to harm the 47th president."
"The indictment looked weak when the DOJ brought it in April. More than anything, it looked like the latest attempt to prosecute one of the presidents political targets, after a previous indictment against Comey was dismissed in Virginia."
"Regardless of the administrations motivations, a new ruling in an unrelated case shows the difficulty the DOJ faces in its latest Comey prosecution."
"That ruling came Monday, when a federal judge in Washington sided with a group that wanted to protest the administration with a flag displaying '8647.' U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss wrote that it was 'difficult to fathom' how the government 'could have concluded that a reasonable observer would view the flag as a true threat.' The Obama-appointed judge noted that the 'term 86 is used far more often to mean throw out than kill.' "
Continued at link:
https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/james-comey-seashells-post-instagram-8647-ruling-civil-case
LetMyPeopleVote
(182,829 posts)In a case unrelated to James Comeys, a judge said its difficult to fathom how a flag bearing those numbers could be seen as a true threat.
Ruling in â8647â civil protest case signals strength of James Comeyâs criminal defense
— Karen (Harris/Walz Alaskan Democrat) (@danceswithseagulls.bsky.social) 2026-06-02T20:19:32.221Z
"In a case unrelated to James Comeyâs, a judge said itâs âdifficult to fathomâ how a flag bearing those numbers could be seen as a âtrue threat.â"
www.ms.now/deadline-whi...
https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/james-comey-seashells-post-instagram-8647-ruling-civil-case
The indictment looked weak when the DOJ brought it in April. More than anything, it looked like the latest attempt to prosecute one of the presidents political targets, after a previous indictment against Comey was dismissed in Virginia.
Regardless of the administrations motivations, a new ruling in an unrelated case shows the difficulty the DOJ faces in its latest Comey prosecution.
That ruling came Monday, when a federal judge in Washington sided with a group that wanted to protest the administration with a flag displaying 8647. U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss wrote that it was difficult to fathom how the government could have concluded that a reasonable observer would view the flag as a true threat. The Obama-appointed judge noted that the term 86 is used far more often to mean throw out than kill......
He noted that the 86 term comes from 1930s soda-counter slang meaning that an item was sold out and that it may have been used because it rhymes with nix.
The judge emphasized that context is key when evaluating whether the numbers can amount to a true threat. Analyzing the case before him, he wrote that the relevant context makes clear that no reasonable observer could have viewed Plaintiffs display of the flag as a threat to the Presidents life or physical safety.....
Viewed through that lens, its difficult to fathom, to use the judges phrase, how an Instagram post of seashells in the sand can clear the high bar of criminal culpability.
This case is not directly binding but will be cited in the Comey case. The Comey case will never make it to a jury. I was amused to see that the lead attorney on this case has resigned from this case.