Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
42 years sgo this hit #1 (Original Post) Figarosmom Wednesday OP
And, To Add To The Anniversary.... ProfessorGAC Wednesday #1
Thanks for adding that. Figarosmom Wednesday #2
That story about cutting the tape with the timecode on it... keep_left Thursday #3
Great Point ProfessorGAC Thursday #4
I grew up with analog tape and I'm still conversant with that... keep_left Thursday #5
For your amusements - Weird Al Yankovic - Eat It Brother Buzz Thursday #6

Figarosmom

(5,417 posts)
2. Thanks for adding that.
Wed Apr 30, 2025, 07:43 PM
Wednesday

I read that today too. Not this particular article but another one telling the story.

keep_left

(2,858 posts)
3. That story about cutting the tape with the timecode on it...
Thu May 1, 2025, 03:42 PM
Thursday

...doesn't quite do justice to what a catastrophe that was, and how great a drummer the late Jeff Porcaro really was. He probably saved all those session hours from the dumpster. Even these days, an event like that is a major disaster--for those who still work with analog tape, anyway. What we would do when faced with such a situation would be to use Porcaro's manual timekeeping track to make a "tempo map"; the computer "listens" to the track and then generates new timecode from that. Everything would depend on getting those critical steps right. Just the thought of that...not to mention the pressure...it gives me chest pains just thinking about it! (I'm getting old!).

The other slight inaccuracy: Steve Lukather claims in a recent interview that he laid down not just the de rigueur double-tracked Marshall rhythm guitars, but eight tracks of Marshalls (quadrupled on each side)! Man, would I love to hear what that sounded like!

ProfessorGAC

(72,473 posts)
4. Great Point
Thu May 1, 2025, 03:52 PM
Thursday

It is amazing how far recording tech has come.
First, a DAW like ProTools Ultimate allows for 2,048 tracks recorded & 256 tracks recorded at a time. So ,synching two recorders would be unnecessary.
Then even if a sync code got lost, it would take 3 mouse moves & a click to line everything back up.
The 8 Marshall tracks must have been what Quincy thought was "too metal".
I'm still just using a 16 track, direct to hard drive recorder. I never thought a dedicated computer & the software was justified for the little recording I do.
It's still way better than my old Tascam 4 track cassette recorder!

keep_left

(2,858 posts)
5. I grew up with analog tape and I'm still conversant with that...
Thu May 1, 2025, 04:16 PM
Thursday

...technology, though hardly anyone is using it anymore (including me). But I had to do a rescue job like this many years ago, and believe me, it was quite stressful. Nowadays I mostly use hard disk recording, but I still have to do the occasional ADAT transfer (ADAT was sort of a "bridge" technology from the '90s). However, I still like a lot of the old analog technology, and I have a studio with a few of the sought-after vintage pieces. (I wish I had known back then what was going to be really valuable--I wouldn't have sold or traded it!). I also track and mix on an analog desk with a basic automation package (faders and mutes). So I still have one foot in the old analog world.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Music Appreciation»42 years sgo this hit #1