Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Photography

George McGovern

(9,890 posts) Fri Aug 1, 2025, 08:47 PM Aug 1

Blue Boy -- an old-fashioned selfie.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Blue Boy -- an old-fashioned selfie. (Original Post) George McGovern Aug 1 OP

Looking good, Blue Boy, George. Experimenting for a while now, we see 🎥 Deuxcents Aug 1 #1

Thank You Deuxcents! Yes. I've heard it's good to try new things. We'll see . . . George McGovern Aug 3 #3

Didn't ya forget the puppy? BTW the new digs look comfy! tazcat Aug 1 #2

Nope. Just didn't want her in my selfie. Selfish I know. Heck she might have George McGovern Aug 3 #4

Deuxcents

(24,571 posts)

1. Looking good, Blue Boy, George. Experimenting for a while now, we see 🎥

Reply to George McGovern (Original post)

Fri Aug 1, 2025, 08:50 PM

Aug 1

George McGovern

(9,890 posts)

3. Thank You Deuxcents! Yes. I've heard it's good to try new things. We'll see . . .

Reply to Deuxcents (Reply #1)

Sun Aug 3, 2025, 05:26 AM

Aug 3

tazcat

(180 posts)

2. Didn't ya forget the puppy? BTW the new digs look comfy!

Reply to George McGovern (Original post)

Fri Aug 1, 2025, 10:17 PM

Aug 1

George McGovern

(9,890 posts)

4. Nope. Just didn't want her in my selfie. Selfish I know. Heck she might have

Reply to tazcat (Reply #2)

Sun Aug 3, 2025, 05:51 AM

Aug 3

felt sad, abandoned, ignored. Like this. (But I actually didn't forget her and Shadow really didn't miss me for a couple of minutes so I didn't feel guilty for my selfish selfie and the sky was blue and the water cool and everyone lived happily forever. End of silly story.
Thanks tazcat

Reply to this discussion