Hillary Clinton condemns Trump and demands 'impeachment'

[Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin]

Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton, reacting to the release of the Trump-Ukraine call transcript, is demanding the impeachment of President Trump.

“The president of the United States has betrayed our country,” she tweeted 15 minutes after the transcript was released.

“That’s not a political statement—it’s a harsh reality, and we must act. He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment,” said Clinton, the wife of the last president to be impeached.

Clinton, who remains bitter about her loss to Trump in the 2016 presidential election, has recently stepped up her attacks on Trump and been on a listening tour similar to those she conducted in advance of her New York Senate and presidential campaigns.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/hillary-clinton-condemns-trump-and-demands-impeachment/ar-AAHPsNZ?li=BBnb7Kz

[question everything]

1. She remained bitter, we remained bitter, and mad

[spooky3]

2. I don't like that line in the article. Who knows how she feels?

And her behavior has been classier by far than mine would have been in the same situation.

On edit: the msn article link goes to Washington Examiner, a right wing source. OP, maybe there is a better source re what Clinton said about Trump and impeachment?

[question everything]

3. I see what you mean. I often do not go to the link so just read

They did include a twit and I suppose this is their interpretation.

Still, am bitter. And I am bitter about many who stayed home or, worse, voted for Trump and I will not identify here the former Democrats who chose not to vote for her.

[lapucelle]

5. The story originated in the right wing Washington Examiner.

Caveat lector.

[lapucelle]

6. MSN pulled the "story" directly from the right wing Washington Examiner.

MSN even included the rag’s banner.

[lapucelle]

4. The story is from the right wing source The Washington Examiner.

The MSN page carries the right wing rag’s banner directly above the story and links to it as well.

[lapucelle]

7. About the 'splainer who wrote Washington Examiner story line...

Paul Bedard’s Washington Examiner column is a PR front for the National Rifle Association

https://www.mediamatters.org/national-rifle-association/paul-bedards-wash-examiner-column-pr-front-national-rifle-association

******************************************************************************************



******************************************************************************************

About the rag that was source of the story...

******************************************************************************************



******************************************************************************************



******************************************************************************************

[lapucelle]

8. ...

[BlueMississippi]

9. I think the OP should self-delete -- right wing source

MSN is only an aggregator -- the original news source is Washington Times.

This OP serves no purpose other than to inflame people like me who hold Hillary Clinton in high esteem.

[ehrnst]

10. The RW rag Washington Examiner is the source for offensive text in this hit piece. Please delete.(nt

[sheshe2]

11. I am a host of the Hillary Group.

Many here have told you the original source of the article is from a RW source: The Washington Examiner. That was 24 hours ago. I wish you had simply deleted.

Sorry. Blocking you from this group.

[NurseJackie]

12. Well deserved. Thank you.

[sheshe2]

13. You are welcome, NJ.

It has been a long time since I had to do that.

[BooScout]

14. Thank you!

[sheshe2]

15. You're welcome, Boo.