Censorship vs. free speech on specialized license plates in Texas
I have to side with the argument that "{o}nce a state decides to make extra cash by allowing groups to put messages on license plates ... it cant reject those it doesnt like without violating the free-speech rights the First Amendment protects."
The Bill of Rights doesn't exist for the people you like. It exists for the people you detest.
Censorship vs. free speech on specialized license plates in Texas
Courts & Law
By Robert Barnes March 23 at 8:51 PM
Swastikas on Texas license plates? Yes, the lawyer answered. Messages promoting jihad? Yes. Make Pot Legal? Yes.
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy kept looking for an outer limit. Your position is that if you prevail, a license plate can have a racial slur? Kennedy asked the attorney for the Sons of Confederate Veterans, which was at the Supreme Court on Monday because Texas wants to keep the groups Confederate-flag logo off the states specialized license plates. ... Yes, replied Austin lawyer R. James George Jr. I dont think theres any consistent decision otherwise.
Once a state decides to make extra cash by allowing groups to put messages on license plates creating a new kind of public forum for speech, George said it cant reject those it doesnt like without violating the free-speech rights the First Amendment protects. ... The court spent an hour with little success, it seemed trying to find a balance.
....
A motorist can purchase a license plate endorsing Dr Pepper and Mighty Fine Burgers, an Austin-based hamburger joint. Theres no clear, identifiable policy . . . that the state is articulating, said Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. I mean, theyre only doing this to get the money.
[font color=red]Dear DUers who are upset by what I say:
I remind those of you who have not already done so that to put me on "ignore," just click on the icon titled "Ignore this member." Don't worry about me; I'll get over it just fine.[/font]
Best wishes,
mahatmakanejeeves