Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(69,790 posts)
Sun Mar 29, 2026, 03:22 PM 5 hrs ago

Looking to limit birthright citizenship, Trump turns to an 1884 Supreme Court ruling against a Native American man

Supreme Court

Looking to limit birthright citizenship, Trump turns to an 1884 Supreme Court ruling against a Native American man

Experts on Native American law say the Elk v. Wilkins ruling has no bearing on whether the children of immigrants without permanent legal status can be denied birthright citizenship.

March 29, 2026, 5:00 AM EDT / Updated March 29, 2026, 9:15 AM EDT
By Lawrence Hurley

WASHINGTON — In a moment that could take on new significance almost 150 years later, Omaha election official Charles Wilkins on April 5, 1880, refused to register John Elk to vote on the grounds that he was Native American, and therefore not an American citizen.

Elk — believed to have been a member of what is now known as the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska — objected, saying he had severed all ties with his tribe and had willingly subjected himself to the authority of the United States. ... He launched a legal challenge, arguing among other things that he was a citizen at birth because he was born within United States territory.

But the Supreme Court, in an 1884 case called Elk v. Wilkins, ruled against him, saying that Native Americans born within the territory of the United States did not have birthright citizenship. They had the same status as “the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government,” the court said.

President Donald Trump’s administration is now citing that case as it defends his plan to end automatic birthright citizenship, putting a new spin on the long-standing interpretation of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the case on Wednesday.

{snip}

Lawrence Hurley
Lawrence Hurley is a senior Supreme Court reporter for NBC News.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Looking to limit birthright citizenship, Trump turns to an 1884 Supreme Court ruling against a Native American man (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves 5 hrs ago OP
I don't think even the MAGA court will buy this argument Fiendish Thingy 4 hrs ago #1

Fiendish Thingy

(23,187 posts)
1. I don't think even the MAGA court will buy this argument
Sun Mar 29, 2026, 04:49 PM
4 hrs ago

Especially if this is the only case they can find to support their position.

EDIT: of course, I mean besides Sammy and Clarence.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Looking to limit birthrig...