General Discussion

SupportSanity

(1,456 posts)

74. The New York Times Company Customer service 1 (800) 698-4637

Reply to senseandsensibility (Original post)

Mon Jun 16, 2025, 10:22 AM

Yesterday

Next time we're marching, we can call them WHILE WE ARE MARCHING and ask them "Where is the coverage?"!

Can you imagine customer service getting inundated with calls from the marchers themselves? In real time?!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

92 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

About the lack of coverage by the NYT of the protests.... [View all] senseandsensibility Sunday OP

People should unsubscribe imo & tell they why SheltieLover Sunday #1

Agree, but so many have already over their coverage of Biden senseandsensibility Sunday #2

Kissing kraznov's fat ass is unacceptable SheltieLover Sunday #3

Obviously not enough. It's hard to write stories when you're out of business. jrthin Sunday #19

Imagine if half the 12.5 mill protesters & 2 or 3 friends SheltieLover Sunday #42

Count me in DENVERPOPS Sunday #49

I have been done with the NY Times ever since it was clear it was a Pro Trump rag. It went from "All the News Fit... NNadir Sunday #17

Hear! Hear! littlemissmartypants Sunday #22

I'm with you, though you did beat me to the punch by a few years... good for you!! InAbLuEsTaTe Sunday #37

All the news that fits, we print. Conjuay Yesterday #78

All the fits that's news to print Seinan Sensei Yesterday #80

And.. littlemissmartypants Sunday #20

I get it. They've been threatened and have no courage. paleotn Sunday #59

Yup spineless harlots SheltieLover Sunday #66

Geez, even Bezos' WP had a huge story comradebillyboy Sunday #4

Glad to hear that senseandsensibility Sunday #5

Yesterday WaPo had a headline iirc that claimed spooky3 Sunday #8

I actually saw a headline on nbc.com yesterday that said senseandsensibility Sunday #11

Ridiculous! Nt spooky3 Sunday #25

I don't think they can bring themsrlves to be truthful. SheltieLover Sunday #45

The WAPO article still sucks. It was nowhere close to journalism. littlemissmartypants Sunday #24

Heard he (Bezos) had to begin breathing through his ears these days. BattleRow Sunday #44

I have never gotten past Judith Miller stillcool Sunday #6

Paper of Record... Kid Berwyn Sunday #7

can confirm... and this makes me furious.......... Takket Sunday #9

Thanks for the confirmation senseandsensibility Sunday #14

The NYT was very weak reporting on Cha Sunday #10

I remember that Cha. senseandsensibility Sunday #12

Also their coverage of Hillary and their Cha Sunday #15

Also weak on the Nazis in the 1930s. This isn't an isolated thing, this is who NYT is deep down. RockRaven Sunday #13

Just cancelled my subscription Zorro Sunday #16

Good for you! SheltieLover Sunday #46

Saturday afternoon events are rarely covered in the Sunday edition. maxsolomon Yesterday #84

Well I guess that excuses them! Zorro Yesterday #85

Yet they were still covering the "perade" on Sunday senseandsensibility Yesterday #86

They DID cover the protests. maxsolomon 23 hrs ago #88

The endless whining about the NYT gets tired after a while bif 23 hrs ago #89

You find it tiresome senseandsensibility 23 hrs ago #90

I didn't call anyone any names. bif 21 hrs ago #92

Speak for yourself. Paladin 22 hrs ago #91

I would expect no better from the present-day NY Times. Paladin Sunday #18

$ Iamscrewed Sunday #21

Yup ... the rich and Russia support him and his agenda. Botany Sunday #35

Avsolutely! SheltieLover Sunday #47

What is the NYT spin on this omission? JoseBalow Sunday #23

Considering the amount of pushback they have been receiving for senseandsensibility Sunday #28

Completely agree. Their lack of coverage is intentional, and that is newsworthy. We cancelled years c-rational Sunday #26

Looking at archive.org, they did cover "No Kings" at first muriel_volestrangler Sunday #27

Thanks for those details. senseandsensibility Sunday #34

Maybe they got a phone call... nt scipan Sunday #64

The failure of the media Godot51 Sunday #29

I did a quick google about No Kings Protests and saw this: Brenda Sunday #30

The Guardian UK is my go-to Alice Kramden Sunday #48

Yes, especially for environmental news. Brenda Sunday #50

The most reliable newspaper mwf Sunday #31

Search under "NYT No Kings," you'll get a bunch of hits including this one. Silent Type Sunday #32

Yesterday afternoon and evening their protest coverage was prominent on their website. femmedem Sunday #33

Seems self evident. Good post Evolve Dammit Sunday #36

my humble recommendation for a newspaper OldSWODog Sunday #38

Same with CNN - yesterdays news? flamingdem Sunday #39

The protests became yesterday's news much more quickly senseandsensibility Sunday #43

Totally true! flamingdem Sunday #70

Every network seemed to be showing the military parade without any critical commentary AdamGG Sunday #40

Thanks for that insight senseandsensibility Sunday #41

Good question AdamGG Sunday #71

I just googled "why didn't nyt cover no kings protests" ailsagirl Sunday #51

Who is writing this? senseandsensibility Sunday #53

This message was self-deleted by its author AllyCat Yesterday #73

This is a fact. defacto7 Sunday #54

NYT had live featured coverage yesterday from dozens of cities defacto7 Sunday #52

This does not contradict anything in my OP which quotes senseandsensibility Sunday #57

They have been threatened they will lose access ala A.P. spanone Sunday #55

CNN has a page devoted to the protests, BUT CrispyQ Sunday #56

Thank you senseandsensibility Sunday #58

M$M is failing us more and more, go to indie news sources uponit7771 Sunday #60

"No Kings" anti-Trump protests attract millions, organizers say Botany Sunday #61

It is bizarre that there is no follow up to the two articles yesterday pat_k Sunday #62

I saw a lot of coverage today of the protest everywhere BlueHurricane Sunday #63

If mentioned at all, The Women's March and June 1 2020 were forgotten within 2 days underpants Sunday #65

I stopped reading that motherfucking piece of shit fishwrap when they started with the pro MAGA fuck shit. SoFlaBro Sunday #67

Just for grins, I did a quick search on nytimes coverage of the 2017 women's march pat_k Sunday #68

Print Media Is Now Corporate Media Metaphorical Sunday #69

Someone posted the same thing at CNN! BigmanPigman Yesterday #72

The New York Times Company Customer service 1 (800) 698-4637 SupportSanity Yesterday #74

In a way this works in our favor. People can see the blatant partisanship because travelingthrulife Yesterday #75

Massive peace demonstrations under Nixon were also ignored by the media. NH Ethylene Yesterday #76

Gifted NYT article re No Kings 6/14 PaxPixie Yesterday #77

Thank You. I agree the media is horrible but the Times published multiple articles on the protests. johnnyplankton Yesterday #81

We've been saying for years: media in this country is 96% owned and dictated by the right wing. BComplex Yesterday #79

They are owned by people Farmer-Rick Yesterday #82

Could the NYT survive on a mostly right leaning readership? The NYT is written at a 10th-12th grade level. Hotler Yesterday #83

For some reason people think they are going to influence what the msm does - TBF 23 hrs ago #87