Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Israel says Iran was racing toward a nuclear weapon. US intel says it was years away [View all]sarisataka
(21,834 posts)39. 1-2 times that weight
so a device weighing three tons- now by your admission shielded to a level to prevent detection. It would not even require a large vehicle to transport. A semi can carry upwards of 40 tons- that's 35+ tons of material to hide a bomb that is not giving off radiation.
From the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the people who maintain the doomsday clock:
How quickly could Iran build its first nuclear weapon? Look at China
How quickly could Iran make an atomic bomb once it has acquired enough weapons-grade uranium? Some nuclear experts argue it would take Iran anywhere between several months to up to a year. But Chinas experience shows that Tehran could build a bomb much fasterin as little as three to five weeks.[1]
***
Portions of Irans nuclear archive, which Israel seized in January 2018, clearly show Irans weaponization projects running in parallel with HEU projects under the Amad Plan, Irans code name for a crash nuclear weapons program that operated from 1999 to 2003. The Amad Plan aimed to produce five 10-kiloton nuclear weapons by early 2004, including four deliverable warheads for the Shahab-3 ballistic missile, and another one for testing underground.
***
Chinas insights. Given the similarities between Irans bomb and Chinas 596/548 atomic bomb designs, the technical bottlenecks and timelines of Chinas bomb development can shed light on Irans possible bomb development timelines.
The major hurdles China faced when making its first atomic bomb included the weapon design, neutron sources, the detonation wave focusing system, cold (or subcritical) tests, and uranium metal components production. All these are non-nuclear weapon components tasks that can be completed before HEU production, the most time-consuming step in the Chinese atomic bomb program. Once China produced HEU, it took abou three to five weeks from having sufficient UF6 gas to an assembled uranium bomb.
thttps://thebulletin.org/2025/01/how-quickly-could-iran-build-its-first-nuclear-weapon-look-at-china/
How quickly could Iran make an atomic bomb once it has acquired enough weapons-grade uranium? Some nuclear experts argue it would take Iran anywhere between several months to up to a year. But Chinas experience shows that Tehran could build a bomb much fasterin as little as three to five weeks.[1]
***
Portions of Irans nuclear archive, which Israel seized in January 2018, clearly show Irans weaponization projects running in parallel with HEU projects under the Amad Plan, Irans code name for a crash nuclear weapons program that operated from 1999 to 2003. The Amad Plan aimed to produce five 10-kiloton nuclear weapons by early 2004, including four deliverable warheads for the Shahab-3 ballistic missile, and another one for testing underground.
***
Chinas insights. Given the similarities between Irans bomb and Chinas 596/548 atomic bomb designs, the technical bottlenecks and timelines of Chinas bomb development can shed light on Irans possible bomb development timelines.
The major hurdles China faced when making its first atomic bomb included the weapon design, neutron sources, the detonation wave focusing system, cold (or subcritical) tests, and uranium metal components production. All these are non-nuclear weapon components tasks that can be completed before HEU production, the most time-consuming step in the Chinese atomic bomb program. Once China produced HEU, it took abou three to five weeks from having sufficient UF6 gas to an assembled uranium bomb.
Three to five weeks is fairly imminent, unless one believes Israel should wait until Tel Aviv is leveled.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Israel says Iran was racing toward a nuclear weapon. US intel says it was years away [View all]
indusurb
Jun 17
OP
Three years away for a country thats stated foreign policy is wiping Israel off the face of the earth?
LexVegas
Jun 17
#3
Should we have followed the McCain proposal to "bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran"
Cuthbert Allgood
Jun 17
#9
So you did read the whole article and yet you only posted the paragraph that supposedly supported your version.
MarineCombatEngineer
Jun 17
#8
Lol, Israel has been stating that Iran was about to drop a nuke for twenty years
indusurb
Jun 17
#10
Why don't you click on the link to the article and read it yourself?
MarineCombatEngineer
Jun 17
#18
OK, so you've reached the Israeli border with your 7,200 pound payload, in a semi or large, obvious box truck
indusurb
Jun 17
#40
And what makes you believe that a suicide bomber wouldn't just detonate it at the border of Israel?
MarineCombatEngineer
Jun 17
#43
Oh but some loves themselves some Tulsi as long as it casts Israel in a negative light,
MarineCombatEngineer
Jun 17
#23
No, you just post misleading threads and include only what supports your thread,
MarineCombatEngineer
Jun 17
#29