Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sarisataka

(21,834 posts)
39. 1-2 times that weight
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 12:18 PM
Jun 17

so a device weighing three tons- now by your admission shielded to a level to prevent detection. It would not even require a large vehicle to transport. A semi can carry upwards of 40 tons- that's 35+ tons of material to hide a bomb that is not giving off radiation.

From the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the people who maintain the doomsday clock:

How quickly could Iran build its first nuclear weapon? Look at China

How quickly could Iran make an atomic bomb once it has acquired enough weapons-grade uranium? Some nuclear experts argue it would take Iran anywhere between several months to up to a year. But China’s experience shows that Tehran could build a bomb much faster—in as little as three to five weeks.[1]

***

Portions of Iran’s “nuclear archive,” which Israel seized in January 2018, clearly show Iran’s weaponization projects running in parallel with HEU projects under the “Amad Plan,” Iran’s code name for a crash nuclear weapons program that operated from 1999 to 2003. The Amad Plan aimed to produce five 10-kiloton nuclear weapons by early 2004, including four deliverable warheads for the Shahab-3 ballistic missile, and another one for testing underground.

***

China’s insights. Given the similarities between Iran’s bomb and China’s 596/548 atomic bomb designs, the technical bottlenecks and timelines of China’s bomb development can shed light on Iran’s possible bomb development timelines.

The major hurdles China faced when making its first atomic bomb included the weapon design, neutron sources, the detonation wave focusing system, “cold” (or subcritical) tests, and uranium metal components production. All these are non-nuclear weapon components tasks that can be completed before HEU production, the most time-consuming step in the Chinese atomic bomb program. Once China produced HEU, it took abou three to five weeks from having sufficient UF6 gas to an assembled uranium bomb.
thttps://thebulletin.org/2025/01/how-quickly-could-iran-build-its-first-nuclear-weapon-look-at-china/

Three to five weeks is fairly imminent, unless one believes Israel should wait until Tel Aviv is leveled.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Doesn't matter what US intelligence has to say. The US will back up Israel Autumn Jun 17 #1
from around 13 years ago: Celerity Jun 17 #7
Netanyahu has cried "wolf" almost 30 years Ponietz Jun 17 #2
Three years away for a country thats stated foreign policy is wiping Israel off the face of the earth? LexVegas Jun 17 #3
Alrighty then, indusurb Jun 17 #5
Should we have followed the McCain proposal to "bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran" Cuthbert Allgood Jun 17 #9
Did you even bother to read the full article? MarineCombatEngineer Jun 17 #4
Oh, I read it indusurb Jun 17 #6
So you did read the whole article and yet you only posted the paragraph that supposedly supported your version. MarineCombatEngineer Jun 17 #8
Lol, Israel has been stating that Iran was about to drop a nuke for twenty years indusurb Jun 17 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author MarineCombatEngineer Jun 17 #11
Why don't you post the text of the article that supports YOUR opinion? House of Roberts Jun 17 #13
Why don't you click on the link to the article and read it yourself? MarineCombatEngineer Jun 17 #18
So your opinion isn't worth sharing? House of Roberts Jun 17 #35
Fine, if that's what you want to do, MarineCombatEngineer Jun 17 #38
The very next paragraph- sarisataka Jun 17 #12
And in the article as well. . . indusurb Jun 17 #14
So now we believe Tulsi Gabbard... how times change sarisataka Jun 17 #16
Included Gabbard's assessment just for the Trump administration POV indusurb Jun 17 #24
Allow me to educate you- sarisataka Jun 17 #28
Wiki, hah, bane of intelligence everywhere indusurb Jun 17 #31
1-2 times that weight sarisataka Jun 17 #39
OK, so you've reached the Israeli border with your 7,200 pound payload, in a semi or large, obvious box truck indusurb Jun 17 #40
Similar check stop 100% sarisataka Jun 17 #41
And what makes you believe that a suicide bomber wouldn't just detonate it at the border of Israel? MarineCombatEngineer Jun 17 #43
With this one, I believe that. MarineCombatEngineer Jun 17 #32
From Tulsi Gaggard? MarineCombatEngineer Jun 17 #20
I thought we hated Tulsi Gabbard? Didn't she love Syria? Heh. nt LexVegas Jun 17 #21
Oh but some loves themselves some Tulsi as long as it casts Israel in a negative light, MarineCombatEngineer Jun 17 #23
What shows? indusurb Jun 17 #25
Don't play coy with me, MarineCombatEngineer Jun 17 #26
Unlike others, I don't assume. indusurb Jun 17 #27
No, you just post misleading threads and include only what supports your thread, MarineCombatEngineer Jun 17 #29
So again, stop beating around the bush indusurb Jun 17 #33
So, again, stop playing coy, MarineCombatEngineer Jun 17 #34
No, actually I don't know what you meant indusurb Jun 17 #37
Paragraphs that the OP purposely left out MarineCombatEngineer Jun 17 #19
It was years. But makes a good excuse. Blue Full Moon Jun 17 #15
Is this another war that Trump said he would stop in 24 hours and all parties would kiss an make up and play nice? Ping Tung Jun 17 #17
FYI, Netanyahu is not a reliable source SocialDemocrat61 Jun 17 #22
Iran has been a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty since 1970. Rob H. Jun 17 #30
Our "leaders" Traildogbob Jun 17 #36
"US Intelligence" Tulsi Gabbard Mountainguy Jun 17 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Israel says Iran was raci...»Reply #39