Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: US Senate UNANIMOUSLY passes Remembrance Day Oct 14th for Kirk [View all]Wiz Imp
(7,265 posts)271. Thank you. I'm not sure why people insist on arguing this point
The Senate can conduct business without a quorum - even as few as just a handful of people present as long as nobody objects. Anything important will always require a quorum because the other side would object to passing it without a quorum. The Democrats clearly deemed the Kirk Day of Remembrance resolution as unimportant so they let Republicans pass it wiht hardly anyone there.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
277 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

It makes our party look weak and submissive. I'm not sure that voters find those traits appealing.
Crunchy Frog
Friday
#53
Make it a national holiday already - and don't forget to erect a statue for the dead troll
dalton99a
Friday
#3
For me, he looks like a Terry Gilliam animation from Monty Python's Flying Circus
Montauk6
7 hrs ago
#275
I guess no one wanted to stick their neck out and object given the climate around this shooting. It's like 9/11 all over
LymphocyteLover
Friday
#112
That's because no Democrats were in the Chamber when the call for unanimous consent was made.
Wiz Imp
Friday
#186
Why do you think the Senate is prohibited from passing legislation by unanimous consent?
tritsofme
23 hrs ago
#269
That's not what I said. What I said is they can't pass legislation with only a handful of people
Wiz Imp
23 hrs ago
#272
Fun fact: Schumer's use of a blanket hold on unanimous consent was what slowed confirmation
lapucelle
22 hrs ago
#274
"It is bad to be oppressed by a minority, but it is worse to be oppressed by a majority." Lord Acton
Ping Tung
Friday
#7
Well, poodles got to poodle. The poodles should write a how to book on how to not inspire people to show up and vote.nt
ImNotGod
Friday
#8
No can do. I'll be busy celebrating the Rocky Horror Picture Show's 50th anniversary.
Heidi
Friday
#9
Wonderful. Can we have a day of remembrance for Charlie Manson, too? Standards are gone.
Vinca
Friday
#12
You keep saying, no democrats were present or walked out... do you have a link to support that?
questionseverything
Yesterday
#221
Finding no evidence they were there is very different from proving they weren't there
questionseverything
Yesterday
#237
Have you changed from no dems to "two California democrats weren't aware "
questionseverything
Yesterday
#242
Cloture was not invoked, and there was no quorum. At least 50 senators were not in the chamber.
lapucelle
Yesterday
#241
Meanwhile, there are folks roasting Democrats based on inaccurate, right-wing rage bait. N/T
lapucelle
Yesterday
#247
Congress encompasses both the House and the Senate. It doesn't just mean the House of Representatives.
Vinca
Yesterday
#224
Or at least to be balanced, rememberance day for George Floyd AND the other one.
flor-de-jasmim
Friday
#15
That is essentially what happened. No one actually cast a vote for the resolution, it passed by unanimous consent
tritsofme
Friday
#81
WTF? As a Canadian, I am absolutely disgusted by this move from democrats in the senate.
Bev54
Friday
#40
The perfect day to remind everyone about what a hate-filled monster Charlie Kirk was.
Martin68
Friday
#41
She wasn't a promoter of bigotry and she didn't get a special, permanent day of remembrance.
Ocelot II
Friday
#137
Did it just condemn the political violence? Or was it also an exercise in hagiography?
Crunchy Frog
Friday
#187
The resolution for the day of remembrance was just to declare a one day day of remembrance
Wiz Imp
Friday
#200
OK, I've just seen multiple posts from people unaware that the House passed a resolution regarding Hortman weeks ago
MichMan
Friday
#104
I suggest you contact your representatives and tell them how angry you are with their vote then
MichMan
Friday
#142
When I was a kid, maybe fifth grade, someone had written "principal" when the correct word to use was "principle."
Xavier Breath
Yesterday
#252
We have to pick our battles & keeping Kirk in the headlines isn't helpful. FFS. And no this isn't like Pelosi's comment
themaguffin
Friday
#154
Pure politics. Meaningless crap. Hopefully it will divert attention from a racist pig back to
lostincalifornia
Friday
#76
I didn't say it was good. I just speculated what I thought their motivation was.
lostincalifornia
Friday
#93
I also question the accuracy of the OP. No way Sanders would have voted for this.
lostincalifornia
Friday
#160
At least 50 senators were not in the chamber when the call for unanimous consent went out.
lapucelle
Yesterday
#250
What "stunt"? At least 50 senators were not in the chamber when the motion for unanimous consent was called.
lapucelle
Yesterday
#249
I'm done - zero $$ to the Democratic Party from me. They don't have my back.
NoMoreRepugs
Friday
#79
Fuck that noise. I'll not be supporting an action that supports the false narrative about what kind of person Kirk was.
Solly Mack
Friday
#91
It is an annual? But it does seem to indicate where this nation is at this point in time.
LiberalArkie
Friday
#100
Theirs not to reason why, Theirs but to do and die: Into the valley of Death
twodogsbarking
Friday
#123
Good Lord! Two weeks ago 70% of the country couldn't have picked this guy out of a lineup.
rsdsharp
Friday
#124
A Democrat should have at least stood and recited Kirk's own words from the well of the Senate,
sop
Friday
#125
Right before the next No Kings Marches so left will be blamed for breaking the FAKE 'PEACE'
blm
Friday
#132
The headline is inaccurate rage bait, and the Economic Times is a right wing source
lapucelle
Friday
#133
Wait, do I still stand accused of *slandering* the the right-wing, fake news source?
lapucelle
Friday
#167
It appears that it's cowardly to call out right wing, fake news sources and the lies
lapucelle
Yesterday
#238
The OP cites the Economic Times, not the Financial Times. I corrected my headline.
lapucelle
Friday
#161
I stand accused of *slandering* the Economic Times for calling out the inaccuracy of its rage bait headline.
lapucelle
Friday
#169
To begin with, it was a resolution, not a bill, and no roll call vote was taken.
lapucelle
Friday
#152
It seems very unlikely. I doubt Sanders voted for this, and also other Senate Democrats also
lostincalifornia
Friday
#159
This will go down in the annals of history as being even more consequential than...
LudwigPastorius
Friday
#153
I assume they worked across the aisle day and night to get that landmark legislation passed
Bluetus
Friday
#175
Point of clarification. It's an abomination, but its not a law and its not permanent.
onenote
Friday
#173
Senate Democrats did not vote unanimously for the Republican's Charlie Kirk Day stunt
Quiet Em
Friday
#177
Celebrate Remberance Day for the One and Only. Orange Asshole Day on June 14th, too.
Donman
Yesterday
#257
Hope we can take this off our calendars later. I would hate to have to look at this very year.
flying_wahini
7 hrs ago
#276