Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZJonnie

(2,028 posts)
6. "but do care about the Epstein file, so Mike Johnson refuse to swear duly voted AZ Adelita Grijalva"
Tue Oct 28, 2025, 04:30 PM
Tuesday

Once again I will intimate on this site that I think Epstein is the distraction, not the other way around. I think they aren't worried a lick about "releasing the Epstein files", because whatever they would release, if ordered, is already purged and redacted. The is no universe in which the public gets the "full Epstein files" with Trump, Bondi, and Patel in charge of their release, and the slimy scotus six to back whatever they decide to do in response to a congressional order to release it.

Ergo, I think the real goal is something far more nefarious.

To whit: they want to see how long they can get away with simply refusing to seat new Democratic members of Congress, even though they've been duly elected. They want to observe the fallout, public opinion, what the courts say and do. Trump wants Johnson to see how long he can get away with just refusing to act. The hoped-for goal would be they discover there's no practical thing that stops them from refuse to seat any new Democrats come next November.

Similar to what McConnell did to Obama over the SCOTUS choice, and we all see the fallout of what was accomplished by that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Economist has Trump's...»Reply #6