Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

tanyev

(48,421 posts)

19. 🤣

Reply to yonder (Reply #15)

Fri Nov 28, 2025, 04:02 PM

Friday

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

eppur_se_muova

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Scientific reports in the age of AI - This actually got published at Nature.com [View all] highplainsdem Friday OP

The new paradigm is minimal editorial oversight... Wounded Bear Friday #1

That figure shouldn't have gotten past anyone who wasn't blind. Including the author. highplainsdem Friday #5

No argument here...nt Wounded Bear Friday #6

I'd be looking hard at the reviewers SheltieLover Friday #2

AI reviewers? KT2000 Friday #3

"Peers" of the author, apparently nilram Friday #13

Famous author: dalton99a Friday #4

Vocational ! College of Press ! and Publishing ! ... just the sort of place you'd expect to be doing autism research. eppur_se_muova Friday #12

"...it went through two rounds of review from two independent peer reviewers." LudwigPastorius Friday #7

Just the thing Bobby Brainworm can wave around as proof he was right about everything. tanyev Friday #8

Anyone looking to ANY dot-com for reliable information needs education Maru Kitteh Friday #9

Holy crap -- look at the "m"(?) in "frymblal" -- it's the weirdest typo ever. eppur_se_muova Friday #10

It is not cromulent because of inadequately embiggened research and review. yonder Friday #15

🤣 tanyev Friday #19

Now we're talking! yonder Friday #26

from Gemini ( Google AI ) lapfog_1 Friday #11

Why post AI results? Gemini can get things wrong as well. Please don't post AI slop here. highplainsdem Friday #16

AI slop? lapfog_1 Friday #18

If you use generative AI even though it's trained on stolen intellectual property, you're acting unethically. highplainsdem Friday #21

so the problem is not that it is "slop" but that it works really well lapfog_1 Friday #27

GenAI is always hallucinating, not reasoning, not aware of what it regurgitated. But some of its highplainsdem Friday #28

The entire internet is slop? Cirsium Saturday #37

most of the content of the internet is not original thought lapfog_1 Saturday #38

Sad Cirsium Saturday #40

Am adding "AI sleuths" to my lifelong list of Annoying Irritants (AI) - UTUSN Friday #14

You've seen people asking if something from a mainstream news source is AI? Asking about it here highplainsdem Friday #20

Yea, at DU at least once, a month ago. The other, irritating latest one was UTUSN Friday #31

Where's the latest one, the one you find irritating? highplainsdem Friday #32

The undeniable one I self deleted as soon as the sleuth found out. UTUSN Friday #33

UTUSN, you just uncovered more stuff being done by the person creating fake Obama videos earlier! highplainsdem Friday #34

You have *way* *far* deeper grip on the whole subject than I will ever have - or *want*! UTUSN Friday #35

There's so much of this deepfake type garbage on YouTube that they'd need fulltime staff to hunt highplainsdem Friday #36

Just pathetic -- peer reviewed my ass Lettuce Be Friday #17

Went through two peer reviews? haele Friday #22

"The primary objectives of this research are ... To develop an explainable AI framework using TabPFNMix and SHAP for struggle4progress Friday #23

I am running out of "disgusted" synonyms to really describe my reaction to this. hlthe2b Friday #24

Just this morning I read about people inserting typos and mixed fonts... LAS14 Friday #25

Cloudflare got shut down for 10 hours last week because of one typo in an executable file. Initech Friday #29

It's crazy how fast we went from 0 to 60 on AI. Initech Friday #30

This is tangential to this thread jfz9580m Saturday #39