Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(10,085 posts)
27. A couple things.
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 02:44 PM
Dec 2025

First, I'd like to see a link to the actual document on the DOJ website that contains this.

Second, it's apparently from an FBI intake document, dated October 27, 2020.

The information is presented as allegations and recollections shared with the FBI, not as findings from a trial or conclusions reached by investigators.

It is important to be clear. An FBI intake document records what was reported to the agency. It is not a determination of guilt, and the allegations described have not been adjudicated in court.

https://balleralert.com/profiles/blogs/epstein-files-trump-rape-allegations-suicide/
The timing(immediately before the 2020 election) will certainly make it suspicious to the people who refuse to believe Trump could have done anything wrong.

So this is not necessarily the "smoking gun" many people think it is. Anyone could have made any allegation they wanted to the FBI tip line and it would have been recorded like this. It would help if someone could identify some corroborating information. Like the name of the person who was found to have committed suicide in Kiefer, OK.

I'm not saying this isn't true. To the contrary, I believe this is a pretty strong and believable allegation. I just think people should be cautious about presenting this as proof of anything until more info comes out.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If this slipped through the cracks pfitz59 Dec 2025 #1
Court Docs: sheshe2 Dec 2025 #21
It's been widely demonstrated that there are very strong reasons to question the authenticity Wiz Imp Dec 2025 #29
I believe her. The attorney who first represented her was a non-publicity seeking attorney pnwmom Dec 2025 #32
Me too srobertss Dec 2025 #45
Things like this disappear every day. Someone files a lawsuit, then signs an NDA pnwmom Dec 2025 #46
Thanks for the link. What a tangled mess. Raven123 Dec 2025 #39
This "Katie Johnson" case was never actually litigated FakeNoose Dec 2025 #42
They had a whole year to get rid of this and they failed. live love laugh Dec 2025 #25
That's because there is so much in there. AllyCat Dec 2025 #26
No way there is only one set of all these docs. Tossing them just makes em more guilty. Bengus81 Dec 2025 #34
Kick dalton99a Dec 2025 #2
No doubt Republican leadership BOSSHOG Dec 2025 #3
No one will do anything leftstreet Dec 2025 #4
You are right BigMin28 Dec 2025 #5
"THE LEFT KNOWS CLINTON DID IT" durablend Dec 2025 #9
My response to anyone making that statement is: Lochloosa Dec 2025 #38
I believe you're correct. MontanaMama Dec 2025 #6
100% correct. Nothing will happen. Just a Democrat hoax don't ya know chicoescuela Dec 2025 #17
Not one of the R's will do anything because they're ALL in on it... slightlv Dec 2025 #48
Yeah. progressoid Dec 2025 #7
Funny how that works out MustLoveBeagles Dec 2025 #11
Of course they did something about it. Someone Ilsa Dec 2025 #12
I question if Pedophile Protectors will grow a spine overnight KS Toronado Dec 2025 #18
I don't use the sarcasm thing BOSSHOG Dec 2025 #20
The Guardians Of Pedophiles is their real name. Justice matters. Dec 2025 #24
No doubt! I'm sure this is the straw that breaks the camel's back!!! LymphocyteLover Dec 2025 #37
But Just Jerome Dec 2025 #8
And her emails !! Pluvious Dec 2025 #15
Wow. underpants Dec 2025 #10
It's too bad Ilsa Dec 2025 #13
Even the Repukes are going to be appalled ... at least enough of them will be FakeNoose Dec 2025 #14
this is just common sense NJCher Dec 2025 #22
I've always believed he's going down ... FakeNoose Dec 2025 #40
Is there an easier to read version of this somewhere? nt LAS14 Dec 2025 #16
I don't know. sheshe2 Dec 2025 #19
Could this be the way the thugs pushing Project 2025 policy finally get rid of him? NoSheep Dec 2025 #23
A couple things. Wiz Imp Dec 2025 #27
I feel the same. Kablooie Dec 2025 #33
I doubt 10,000 docs would be enough for some people Skittles Dec 2025 #50
Got another source besides "Kye"? Fiendish Thingy Dec 2025 #28
Post 21 Court Documents. sheshe2 Dec 2025 #30
If they are actual court documents, they would be available on the court's website. Nt Fiendish Thingy Dec 2025 #31
You are saying Bondi would allow certain documents to be viewed. sheshe2 Dec 2025 #53
Yes, someone filed a lawsuit under the name "Katie Johnson" Wiz Imp Dec 2025 #41
Is that the one with the note on the last page ? GusBob Dec 2025 #35
I just saw that part Wiz Imp Dec 2025 #43
Well, I just read this. I had to print it out to actually read it. This is heavy shit, very heavy shit..... ashredux Dec 2025 #36
The Victim Clouds Passing Dec 2025 #44
so which reporter will ask ???? RANDYWILDMAN Dec 2025 #47
I honestly don't know anything about this "Katie Johnson" thing... slightlv Dec 2025 #49
Download the court filing azureblue Dec 2025 #51
I can do that but slightlv Dec 2025 #52
I heard that some of those redactions were done badly Queso Delicioso Dec 2025 #54
You're right! red dog 1 Dec 2025 #55
I thought there was video of Katie making this claim Jarqui Dec 2025 #56
I believe the victims. Six117 Dec 2025 #57
My big question here Owens Dec 2025 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This is no longer rumor c...»Reply #27