General Discussion

Wiz Imp

(8,892 posts)

29. It's been widely demonstrated that there are very strong reasons to question the authenticity

Tue Dec 23, 2025, 01:52 PM

Dec 23

of the "Katie Johnson" allegations. I'm not saying they are false, but they are far from proven.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/09/03/trump-epstein-katie-johnson/

The Bottom Line
Recent claims that new documents prove the validity of the Johnson claims are false, because these documents are from 2016 and have nothing to do with what have become known as the "Epstein docs."

Viral claims that Trump has a history of sexually assaulting children first emerged with the Johnson lawsuits in 2016. Pictures of court documents related to the case have lent perceived credibility to additional unsourced claims of child abuse that followed, and memes frequently combine the two claims.

Such claims are not new, come with several red flags and originated with an aggressive push by a serial fabulist.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

reACTIONary

58 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This is no longer rumor circulating online. It's written into the files. [View all] sheshe2 Dec 23 OP

If this slipped through the cracks pfitz59 Dec 23 #1

Court Docs: sheshe2 Dec 23 #21

It's been widely demonstrated that there are very strong reasons to question the authenticity Wiz Imp Dec 23 #29

I believe her. The attorney who first represented her was a non-publicity seeking attorney pnwmom Dec 23 #32

Me too srobertss Dec 23 #45

Things like this disappear every day. Someone files a lawsuit, then signs an NDA pnwmom Dec 23 #46

Thanks for the link. What a tangled mess. Raven123 Dec 23 #39

This "Katie Johnson" case was never actually litigated FakeNoose Dec 23 #42

They had a whole year to get rid of this and they failed. live love laugh Dec 23 #25

That's because there is so much in there. AllyCat Dec 23 #26

No way there is only one set of all these docs. Tossing them just makes em more guilty. Bengus81 Dec 23 #34

Kick dalton99a Dec 23 #2

No doubt Republican leadership BOSSHOG Dec 23 #3

No one will do anything leftstreet Dec 23 #4

You are right BigMin28 Dec 23 #5

"THE LEFT KNOWS CLINTON DID IT" durablend Dec 23 #9

My response to anyone making that statement is: Lochloosa Dec 23 #38

I believe you're correct. MontanaMama Dec 23 #6

100% correct. Nothing will happen. Just a Democrat hoax don't ya know chicoescuela Dec 23 #17

Not one of the R's will do anything because they're ALL in on it... slightlv Dec 23 #48

Yeah. progressoid Dec 23 #7

Funny how that works out MustLoveBeagles Dec 23 #11

Of course they did something about it. Someone Ilsa Dec 23 #12

I question if Pedophile Protectors will grow a spine overnight KS Toronado Dec 23 #18

I don't use the sarcasm thing BOSSHOG Dec 23 #20

The Guardians Of Pedophiles is their real name. Justice matters. Dec 23 #24

No doubt! I'm sure this is the straw that breaks the camel's back!!! LymphocyteLover Dec 23 #37

But Just Jerome Dec 23 #8

And her emails !! Pluvious Dec 23 #15

Wow. underpants Dec 23 #10

It's too bad Ilsa Dec 23 #13

Even the Repukes are going to be appalled ... at least enough of them will be FakeNoose Dec 23 #14

this is just common sense NJCher Dec 23 #22

I've always believed he's going down ... FakeNoose Dec 23 #40

Is there an easier to read version of this somewhere? nt LAS14 Dec 23 #16

I don't know. sheshe2 Dec 23 #19

Could this be the way the thugs pushing Project 2025 policy finally get rid of him? NoSheep Dec 23 #23

A couple things. Wiz Imp Dec 23 #27

I feel the same. Kablooie Dec 23 #33

I doubt 10,000 docs would be enough for some people Skittles Dec 23 #50

Got another source besides "Kye"? Fiendish Thingy Dec 23 #28

Post 21 Court Documents. sheshe2 Dec 23 #30

If they are actual court documents, they would be available on the court's website. Nt Fiendish Thingy Dec 23 #31

You are saying Bondi would allow certain documents to be viewed. sheshe2 Dec 23 #53

Yes, someone filed a lawsuit under the name "Katie Johnson" Wiz Imp Dec 23 #41

Is that the one with the note on the last page ? GusBob Dec 23 #35

I just saw that part Wiz Imp Dec 23 #43

Well, I just read this. I had to print it out to actually read it. This is heavy shit, very heavy shit..... ashredux Dec 23 #36

The Victim Clouds Passing Dec 23 #44

so which reporter will ask ???? RANDYWILDMAN Dec 23 #47

I honestly don't know anything about this "Katie Johnson" thing... slightlv Dec 23 #49

Download the court filing azureblue Dec 23 #51

I can do that but slightlv Dec 23 #52

I heard that some of those redactions were done badly Queso Delicioso Dec 24 #54

You're right! red dog 1 Dec 24 #55

I thought there was video of Katie making this claim Jarqui Dec 24 #56

I believe the victims. Six117 Dec 24 #57

My big question here Owens Dec 24 #58