Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(105,496 posts)
11. OK, at what time are you saying that DUers were the problem, rather than the media who reported it?
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 06:08 PM
15 hrs ago

You say it's DUers that should have been "fact checking". Do you think that ought to be aimed at the media who have the actual abilities to fact check, rather than DUers who were just reposting what the media had?

If you feel you had "egg on your face", then by your standard, you should have been fact checking too.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wow please fact check your posts [View all] snowybirdie 15 hrs ago OP
Why would you doubt that letter? Birds of a feather flock together- like Epstein reaching out to nasser Blues Heron 15 hrs ago #1
NBC fact Checked snowybirdie 15 hrs ago #16
Hardly the gold standard there lol Blues Heron 15 hrs ago #17
Why did the DOJ release the fake Nassar letter malaise 15 hrs ago #2
This is their plan. The heavily redacted batch didn't fly. So then they released that second batch. Scrivener7 15 hrs ago #3
Oh, that's really Machiavellian... ananda 15 hrs ago #4
It's how they tried to hide Abu Ghraib. It toppled Dan Rather then, but ultimately didn't work. Scrivener7 15 hrs ago #6
Exactly. yellow dahlia 15 hrs ago #8
Post removed Post removed 15 hrs ago #13
Again, see the Forbes article. It lists the elements in the letter that show it to be false. Scrivener7 15 hrs ago #15
Yeah I read it and the "analysis" is laughable Mr.WeRP 14 hrs ago #18
Have a lovely holiday. Scrivener7 14 hrs ago #19
... demmiblue 14 hrs ago #28
Oh, NOW I get this! It wasn't me, I swear. Scrivener7 14 hrs ago #31
Lol! I stand corrected... he has no more. demmiblue 14 hrs ago #35
They are trying to create confusion, so that nothing can be credible. yellow dahlia 15 hrs ago #5
That set of my spidy sense as well. yourout 15 hrs ago #7
Red Herring? 2naSalit 15 hrs ago #9
It's in the files Kaleva 15 hrs ago #10
Because it purports to be canetoad 14 hrs ago #32
"Flood the zone with bullshit" - Steve Bannon This way, no one will be sure what is true and what is not true. Midnight Writer 14 hrs ago #36
OK, at what time are you saying that DUers were the problem, rather than the media who reported it? muriel_volestrangler 15 hrs ago #11
I find it odd that you are dismissing released evidence by the DoJ Mr.WeRP 15 hrs ago #12
Here's a Forbes article listing the elements in the letter that indicate it is false. Scrivener7 15 hrs ago #14
Yeah I read that and it is based solely on statements by DoJ leadership Mr.WeRP 14 hrs ago #20
I have read the forbes article a couple of times now questionseverything 14 hrs ago #23
I agree. We just can't know. And that's a big problem. Scrivener7 14 hrs ago #25
One can't prove a negative Kaleva 14 hrs ago #24
Of course you can prove a negative, if you have proof that is. Why would they choose to implicate trump Blues Heron 14 hrs ago #30
Where's your proof that the Nassar letter was fake? Wiz Imp 14 hrs ago #21
As more information comes out (like the reasons why the Epstein letter to Nasser mentioning Trump screams "fake" hlthe2b 14 hrs ago #22
Believe Bondi? It's in there not added. Blue Full Moon 14 hrs ago #26
Heh, good luck with that! n/t demmiblue 14 hrs ago #27
Unclench, would ya? Iggo 14 hrs ago #29
Is it possible/probable that the files contain all leads ? Raven123 14 hrs ago #33
I think you're right. Scrivener7 14 hrs ago #37
don't waffle, just dance DoBW 14 hrs ago #34
As reported tonight snowybirdie 13 hrs ago #38
One of the way posts are fact checked is by posting information. Irish_Dem 13 hrs ago #39
I haven't found Duers to be any more reliable than any other group of people on social media in fact checking - Ms. Toad 13 hrs ago #40
We are not journalists, and have no way to solidly fact-check. usonian 11 hrs ago #41
There's a lot more going on here than meets the eye. Patton French 2 hrs ago #42
Has anyone checked with Nassar? He might shed some light, and he's still alive, allegorical oracle 22 min ago #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wow please fact check you...»Reply #11