Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(175,873 posts)
11. A friend posted this on facebook
Fri Dec 26, 2025, 10:19 AM
Dec 26

This is from a retired naval officer

The following was posted by Gary Clamurro, a retired Navy captain who I have known for over 40 years:

The Administration has announced the launch of a new class of 'old' naval vessels: the Trump Class Battleship. Is this a wise development for projecting US Naval power?

Disclaimer: Y'all will recall that my first assignment in the USN was on a ballistic missile submarine where stealth and silence meant survival at sea.

Big beautiful 'Gold' battleships are a sea animal whose time has passed. From the time of Teddy Roosevelt's Great White Fleet (white because they were painted white, not for any other reason), nearly 120 years ago, the battleship was meant to be a visible projection of national power. Naval Air power at the end of WW II ended the era of the battleship. They are indeed big and visible and easily targeted on the 21st Century battle space at sea. Not good. We have tactical strategies in place to keep our large aircraft carriers out of harms way, and to mitigate the effectiveness of our adversaries' hypersonic missiles. The USN would need to do the same for each battleship.

The best fleet, the most deadly fleet, is the one that you cannot see, the one you cannot track, the one you cannot hear. The one that you cannot know when it is just off your coast and ready to launch hundreds of cruise, guided and ballistic missiles. Of course, every once and a while you need to demonstrate the deadly power of such weapons platforms: ask the Iranians about the effectiveness of 30 or 40 submarine launched cruise missiles.

And you don't have to sink a battleship (or any ship, for that matter) to take it out of commission. A well positioned Electro Magnetic Pulse near a vessel would destroy its electronics capabilities and render the ship useless for combat.

In a war at sea between or among nations with such EMP capabilities, size doesn't matter. There will be ship casualties. In my thinking it is better to have more vessels (especially submarines) than a few Big Beautiful Battleships.

Just saying.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump's New Battleship Wi...»Reply #11