Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Maraya1969

(23,435 posts)
Wed Jan 28, 2026, 01:02 AM Yesterday

I have a bit of a question. About a week ago I asked why Bill and Hillary couldn't just [View all]

say they would not testify until the full Epstein files were released as, (my words) suppression of evidence is illegal and unfair to any witness.

Now I just listened to part of testimony that enlightened me that they were both held in contempt of congress already and the r's are trying to get them in before the time is up for that.

I am obviously not a lawyer so please bear with me. If Bill testifies what is stopping him from implicating Trump during his testimony? This has had to be done at other Rico type trials in the past right? sofahide:

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I have a bit of a questio...