Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

EdmondDantes_

(1,467 posts)

11. That's a stretch that wouldn't implicate Trump

Reply to Maraya1969 (Reply #7)

Wed Jan 28, 2026, 09:58 AM

Yesterday

Being a guest at a public party isn't a connection to sex crimes. That's literally what Republicans are trying to imply about Bill Clinton and nobody here is buying that connection about Bill Clinton.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I have a bit of a question. About a week ago I asked why Bill and Hillary couldn't just [View all] Maraya1969 Yesterday OP

IANAL, but my guess is that the Clintons' case is based on suppressing evidence which would clear them. usonian Yesterday #1

Basically some common "legal stuff" doesn't applies when you're compelled to testify before Congress AZJonnie Yesterday #2

The whole thing looks bad Johonny Yesterday #9

I've always thought they should testify and take the 5th and add that it's in order to protect the current president. Vinca Yesterday #3

I like that! Maraya1969 Yesterday #6

How would Bill implicate Trump? Tommy Carcetti Yesterday #4

idk He could mention that people talked about how frequent a guest Trump was Maraya1969 Yesterday #7

That's a stretch that wouldn't implicate Trump EdmondDantes_ Yesterday #11

I can't imagine that swing district representatives want anything to do with this vote Buckeyeblue Yesterday #5

Isn't little Gym Jorden STILL in contempt of court? Greybnk48 Yesterday #8

I thought it was a tactic to get it to court which would force discovery (all files necessary) instead of the GOP's... Jbraybarten Yesterday #10

Release all the files, and we'll testify. It's not Emile Yesterday #12

My understanding the Clinton's will not testify behind closed doors, will do so publicly MagickMuffin Yesterday #13