Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZJonnie

(3,098 posts)
3. To be fair autotune is quite different (and more egregious) than not recording together
Thu Jan 29, 2026, 01:22 PM
Thursday

The large majority of non-live albums since multi-track recording became the norm in the 70's are just that, not live (i.e. not every member playing together). It's so common that when the version on the (studio) album is actually a whole group all playing together and being recorded at the same time, it's kinda notable, bands will put in the liner notes things like "this album was recorded live in studio" types of things to demark the specialness of that recording style (as you say, nowadays )

It remains, however, pretty damn common for the rhythm section to play/record together (in two booths, using headphones to hear each other) to lay down the backing rhythm tracks (which then goes on the album), then other people lay down their tracks on top of that foundation (guitar, vocals, keys, horns, etc), typically one at a time. I don't think there's any shame in that, but autotune is a whole other degree of lameness, totally agree there!

The most key point though is it's still PEOPLE!

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bruce Springsteen's new p...»Reply #3