Of course, I expect no less. And this is important ..... an example of Rubin's telling me that for democracy to work, to obtain a civil society, as individuals we have the duty to question every statement of fact on important issues.
For a wide variety of reasons, the second killing of a person merely exercising their constitutional rights has had a significant impact upon the nation's perception of this mis-administration. Thus, we have seen even cowardly republicans saying the White House's initial reaction, describing the victim as intent upon the mass murder of federal agents, etc, was an ugly lie.
While I rarely put stock in polls, some have indicated that the felon's popularity is continuing to drop. It is tiny drip after drop, but it is indeed significant.
We are hours away from next month. In theory, Mr. Smith's second report will become public in February. Of course, the DOJ has filed to keep it sealed. While possible Cannon will agree, this will be rapidly overturned. Obviously, some of the documents are far too secret to be released, yet there is the tape of the felon showing one of these to a group of fiends. He notes he no longer has the authority to be showing them to anyone.
Add the likely further testimony of Mr. Smith at the end of the month, or early March. I have said many times, with 100% accuracy, that the image of Jack Smith haunts the felon. It's funny, watching Mr. Smith talk, his otherworldlyness reminds me of talking with Daniel Berrigan decades ago. Now, Daniel went by the bible, and at times broke the law. Mr. Smith goes by the Constitution and the rule of law, seeking to enforce the law. But both have the air of a prophet of old, haunting criminal "leaders."
Three million document from the Epstein Pedo Files were released yesterday. I do not think the DOJ is acting in good faith. Now, another friend asked me why we are not seeing intelligence files among them? I said that much of what we are seeing are "raw intelligence." There is a need for people in DC and on podcasts to explain this, because most people are like my friend, with no background in the sport of intelligence. Reminds me of the days of the Plame scandal.
Next let's consider that vile, convicted sex offender Maxwell. She recently communicated through her lawyer that she is thinking about going public about the approximately 20 to 25 others who the DOJ made deals with back with Epstein's Florida slap on the wrist case. She thinks that if they get off, it's only fair she get that same deal she thought she had twenty years ago. The thing I want you to keep in mind is that she isn't the only one who knows their names. Yet it puts the felon in a bad spot, with only two bad options: pardon her to keep her quiet, or ignore the risk of her really opening up.
I can list more, and likely will do so later today or tonight.
= new reply since forum marked as read